Literature DB >> 33437669

Endometrial clear cell carcinoma invading the right oviduct with a cooccurring ipsilateral oviduct adenomatoid tumor: A case report.

Zhi-Xiong Hu1, Min-Hua Tan1, Qiong-Zhen Li2, Jia-Li Xu3, Wei Chen1, Zhi-Hao Xie1, Yong-Jian Zhou1, Qing Liang1, Jian-Hong An4, Hong Shen5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinicopathological features of endometrial clear cell carcinoma that has invaded the right oviduct with a cooccurring ipsilateral oviduct adenomatoid tumor. CASE
SUMMARY: A case of endometrial clear cell carcinoma invading the right oviduct with a cooccurring ipsilateral oviduct adenomatoid tumor was collected and analyzed using pathomorphology and immunohistochemistry. Endometrial clear cell carcinoma cells were distributed in a solid nest, papillary, shoe nail-like, and glandular tube-like distribution. There was infiltrative growth, and tumor cells had clear cytoplasm and obvious nuclear heteromorphism. The cancer tissue was necrotic and mitotic. The cancer tissue invaded the right oviduct. The ipsilateral oviduct also had an adenomatoid tumor. The adenomatoid tumor was arranged in microcapsules lined with flat or cubic cells that were surrounded by smooth muscle tissue. The adenomatoid tumor cells were round in shape.
CONCLUSION: Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium can invade the oviduct and occur simultaneously with tubal adenomatoid tumors. Upon pathological diagnosis, one should pay close attention to distinguishing whether an endometrial clear cell carcinoma is invading the oviduct or whether it is accompanied by an adenomatoid tumor of the oviduct. Immunohistochemistry is helpful to differentiate these two disease entities. Endometrial clear cell carcinomas express Napsin-A and P16 and are negative for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor. The presence of endometrial clear cell carcinoma does not affect the expression of CK and calretinin in adenomatoid tumors. ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenomatoid tumors; Case report; Clear cell carcinoma; Differential diagnosis; Endometrium; Oviduct

Year:  2020        PMID: 33437669      PMCID: PMC7769714          DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i12.1076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2218-4333


Core Tip: In pathological diagnosis, when investigating invasion of the oviduct, one should pay close attention to distinguishing whether the endometrial clear cell carcinoma invades the oviduct or whether it is accompanied by an oviduct adenomatoid tumor. The significance of this investigation is to determine whether the endometrial adenocarcinoma has tubal metastasis. This is critical for the confirmation of T3a in tumor-node-metastasis staging.

INTRODUCTION

Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium is a special pathological type of endometrial carcinoma which accounts for only 3.5% of all endometrial carcinomas[1]. Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium is highly invasive and is associated with a poor prognosis. Adenomatoid tumors are rare benign tumors that mainly occur in the reproductive systems of both men and women[2]. In women they are common in the uterus and rarely occur in the oviduct. The coexistence of endometrial clear cell carcinoma and oviduct adenomatoid tumor is even rarer. Here we present a case of endometrial clear cell carcinoma invading the right oviduct with a cooccurring ipsilateral adenomatoid tumor which was collected at The First People’s Hospital of Zhaoqing. Pathological morphology and immunohistochemical analysis were performed to provide reference for clinical pathological diagnosis and differential diagnosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

The patient presented with irregular vaginal bleeding for 2 years and vaginal discharge for 1 year. Additionally, her menstrual period was prolonged and disordered, and her menstrual volume was large. Occasionally during menstruation there were blood clots and flocculent tissues.

History of present illness

In April 2020, curettage was performed in another hospital and the pathology report of the resected tissue suggested endometrial carcinoma of the uterine cavity. The tumor was predicted to be a type ΙΙ endometrial carcinoma and surgical treatment was recommended.

History of past illness

For further diagnosis and treatment, the patient was admitted to The First People’s Hospital of Zhaoqing in June 2020. The patient underwent bilateral tubal ligation in 2004.

Physical examination

A gynecological examination concluded that the vulva was normal, the vagina was unobstructed, there was a low volume of thin secretions, the cervix was slightly inflamed, there was no hypertrophy of the cervix and no lifting pain or coloring, the uterine body was in the posterior position, the uterus was enlarged and tough to the equivalent of 2 mo of pregnancy, the activity of cervix was general, there was no tenderness in the abdomen, and no mass was palpable in bilateral appendages.

Laboratory examinations

Routine blood tests showed a low hemoglobin level at 69 g/L and high levels of tumor associated antigens CA125 and CA15-3, which were 76.2 U/mL and 28.28 U/mL, respectively.

Imaging examinations

Gynecological color Doppler ultrasound showed solid lesions in the uterus and mixed lesions between the right ovary and right uterine horn. The lesions were approximately 44 mm × 27 mm in size, had an unclear boundary with the right ovary, had an uneven echo distribution, and had no change in posterior echo. The patient was treated by total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, and pelvic adhesion lysis (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Cauliflower mass in the uterine cavity (black arrow) and right oviduct mass (orange arrow).

Cauliflower mass in the uterine cavity (black arrow) and right oviduct mass (orange arrow).

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

There were three main pathological diagnostic observations: (1) The cancerous tissue was a mixed endometrial adenocarcinoma. The cancer tissue infiltrated the deep muscle layer of the uterus, and invaded the right oviduct and the ipsilateral oviduct. The mixed endometrial adenocarcinoma was accompanied by an adenomatous tumor; (2) No tumors were found in the cervix, left oviduct, or bilateral ovaries; and (3) No cancer metastasis was found in bilateral pelvic lymph nodes.

TREATMENT

The patient presented with irregular vaginal bleeding, excessive vaginal discharge, moderate anemia, and increased tumor associated antigen expression. A B-mode ultrasound scan revealed solid intrauterine lesions and mixed lesions between the right ovary and the right cornu uteri. The pathological investigation of the tumor biopsy confirmed the presence of uterine cavity type II endometrial carcinoma and indicated that surgical intervention was required.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The patient recovered well after operation, and no complications occurred during the follow-up of 3 mo.

DISCUSSION

Endometrial clear cell carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor. It is a type II endometrial cancer that is highly invasive and prone to metastasis, has high recurrence and mortality rates, and has a poor prognosis[3,4]. The main clinical symptom is irregular vaginal bleeding. This patient presented with irregular vaginal bleeding and discharge. Investigative blood tests showed moderate anemia and elevated tumor-associated antigens CA125 and CA15-3. B-mode ultrasound showed multiple lesions consistent with malignant endometrial tumors which had pathological abnormalities. This was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining. Cancer tissue invaded the right oviduct, indicating that metastasis has occurred. A high proportion of tumor cells expressed Ki-67, indicating that the tumor had a high proliferation index and that the tumor was growing fast. In this case, the morphology of the endometrial clear cell carcinoma was complex. We report nest-like, solid, papillary, shoe nail-like and glandular tube-like infiltration into the deep myometrium. The cytoplasm of the cancer cells was clear or eosinophilic and the nucleoli were obvious. Necrosis and mitosis were also obvious. Mucus secretion was observed in some glandular cavities. We also observed interstitial fiber hyperplasia that is consistent with the histopathological morphology of endometrial clear cell carcinoma reported in the literature[5] (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Histology of the uterine tumor (hematoxylin and eosin staining). A: The cancer tissue showed nest-like and solid infiltration into the myometrium; B: The cytoplasm of tumor cells was clear; C: Tumor cells were papillary and had a stud-like arrangement; D: Tumor cells were arranged in a glandular tube. Mucus was present in the gland cavity.

Histology of the uterine tumor (hematoxylin and eosin staining). A: The cancer tissue showed nest-like and solid infiltration into the myometrium; B: The cytoplasm of tumor cells was clear; C: Tumor cells were papillary and had a stud-like arrangement; D: Tumor cells were arranged in a glandular tube. Mucus was present in the gland cavity. In order to make informed decisions on the best future therapeutic regimes, the tumor tissue needs to be differentiated from endometrioid carcinoma, serous carcinoma, and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Here we identified a type II endometrioid carcinoma. Type II endometrioid carcinoma is often histologically tubular and cribriform, whereas papillary histology is rare. In this case, stromal cells were absent and the tumor was surrounded by complex hyperplasia of the endometrium which lacked the characteristic transparent cytoplasm of clear cell carcinoma. Occasionally in endometrial carcinoma, subnuclear vacuoles similar to secretory endometrium may appear. These express CK, CK7, vimentin, ER, PR, and P16, but do not express the endometrial marker Napsin A. Here we report an endometrial carcinoma with the typical morphology of clear cell carcinoma. This case expresses CK, CK7, P16, and Napsin A, but does not express vimentin, ER, or PR. This confirms the presence of endometrial clear cell carcinoma[6]. Ping et al[7] and others have shown that there are three expression patterns of Napsin A in endometrial clear cell carcinoma: Punctate, focal, and diffuse. In this case, we observed punctate expression of Napsin A, which supports the diagnosis of clear cell carcinoma. ER and PR are robust differential diagnostic markers which distinguish between clear cell carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma. The lack of ER and PR expression in this case excluded the possibility of endometrioid carcinoma. Microscopically, serous carcinoma typically forms a nipple-like structure but can also be arranged in glandular tube or solid structures. The nipple has three forms: A large and wide nipple, small nipples clustered around a large nipple, or an intraductal nipple. Intraductal nipple is characterized by obvious atypia of tumor cells, high nuclear grade, serous cytoplasm, and eosinophilic cytoplasm, and some may have sand bodies. Additionally, immunohistochemical staining indicates that serous carcinoma is strongly positive for p53 and P16[8] (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Immunohistochemical staining of the intrauterine tumor. A: Positivity for CK7; B: Positivity for Napsin-A; C: Positivity for P16; D: High Ki-67 index; E: Negativity for vimentin; F: Negativity for ER; G: Wild type p53; H: Negativity for Wilms’ tumor 1.

Immunohistochemical staining of the intrauterine tumor. A: Positivity for CK7; B: Positivity for Napsin-A; C: Positivity for P16; D: High Ki-67 index; E: Negativity for vimentin; F: Negativity for ER; G: Wild type p53; H: Negativity for Wilms’ tumor 1. Serous carcinoma was ruled out in this patient due to transparent cytoplasm of the tumor cells, morphological characteristics that did not resemble serous carcinoma, normal P53 expression, mottled positive expression of P16, and Napsin A positive cells. Additionally, there was an absence of Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT-1), a tumor suppressor gene that is widely expressed in ovarian serous carcinoma and less than 20%-30% in endometrial serous carcinomas[9]. The lack of WT-1 expression in this case further eliminates the diagnosis of serous carcinoma. Metastatic ccRCC is associated with similar symptoms to a renal tumor, such as a hematuria. Imaging examination of ccRCC can find renal space-occupying lesions. Common metastatic sites are the lung, bone, liver, and brain. Morphologically, in addition to clear cells, blood sinus-like structures can also be observed. ccRCC tumors express CD10 and vimentin and have a low Ki-67 index. In this patient, vimentin was not expressed whereas Ki-67 was highly expressed; we therefore excluded metastatic ccRCC. Furthermore, CA125 was localized to the margin of the cavity, which supports the diagnosis of a primary uterine tumor. However, the possibility of a mixed endometrial carcinoma could not be ruled out. Adenomatous tumors are benign tumors that are exclusive to the reproductive system. They can occur in the uterus, oviducts, ovaries, and ovarian crowns[10]. It is now clear that adenomatoid tumors originate from mesothelial cells[11,12]. The pathological diagnosis of an adenomatoid tumor is mainly based on the characteristics of tumor cells, such as lacunar, adenoid, vascular, or cystic structure, intraluminal mucus, anaplastic and mitotic features, lined with flat or cubic cells. Immunohistochemical staining of adenomatous tumors shows strong expression of CK and calretinin. To ensure the best clinical management, it is important that they are differentiated from angioleiomyoma, lymphangioma, leiomyolipoma, adenocarcinoma, and signet ring cell carcinoma[13]. In this patient, the adenomatous tumor occurred in the oviduct with a typical morphology. The immunohistochemical staining for CK and calretinin showed strong positive expression, which supported the diagnosis of an adenomatoid tumor (Figure 4). This patient underwent a tubal ligation in 2004. Whether this procedure potentially induced the development of the adenomatoid tumor needs to be further investigated. An adenomatoid tumor and endometrial clear cell carcinoma coexisted in this case (Figure 5). There was a clear boundary between the adenomatoid tumor and endometrial clear cell carcinoma. There was no clear cell carcinoma component within the adenomatoid tumor, indicating that it was more difficult to invade than normal uterine smooth muscle tissue. The expression of CK and calretinin in cancer tissues suggested that the two tumors had different origins and were not the same tumor, however further investigation is needed to confirm this.
Figure 4

Immunohistochemical staining of the oviduct tumor. A: The tumor tissue and adenomatoid tumor were CK positive; B: The tumor tissue was calretinin negative and adenomatoid tumor was calretinin positive.

Figure 5

Histology of the oviduct mass (hematoxylin and eosin staining). A: Cancer tissue coexisted with adenomatoid tumor area; B: Microcapsule-like structure of adenomatoid tumor area.

Immunohistochemical staining of the oviduct tumor. A: The tumor tissue and adenomatoid tumor were CK positive; B: The tumor tissue was calretinin negative and adenomatoid tumor was calretinin positive. Histology of the oviduct mass (hematoxylin and eosin staining). A: Cancer tissue coexisted with adenomatoid tumor area; B: Microcapsule-like structure of adenomatoid tumor area.

CONCLUSION

In summary, we have shown that endometrial clear cell carcinoma, a tumor that can invade the oviduct, can cooccur with oviduct adenomatoid tumors. Endometrial clear cell carcinoma is Napsin A and P16 positive, and ER and PR negative. Furthermore, the presence of endometrial clear cell carcinoma does not affect the expression of CK and calretinin in an adenomatoid tumor. In pathological diagnosis, when investigating invasion of the oviduct, one should pay close attention to distinguishing whether the endometrial clear cell carcinoma invades the oviduct or whether it is accompanied by an oviduct adenomatoid tumor. The significance of this investigation is to determine whether the endometrial adenocarcinoma has tubal metastasis. This is critical for the confirmation of T3a in tumor-node-metastasis staging.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Immunohistochemical characterization of endometrial carcinomas: endometrioid, serous and clear cell adenocarcinomas in association with genetic analysis.

Authors:  Masanori Yasuda
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Immunohistochemical Comparison of Ovarian and Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma With Clear Cell Change, and Clear Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Diana Lim; Philip P C Ip; Annie N Y Cheung; Takako Kiyokawa; Esther Oliva
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Adjuvant therapy in patients with clear cell endometrial carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Karina Nieto; William Adams; Nghia Pham; Alec M Block; Surbhi Grover; William Small; Matthew M Harkenrider
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  [Clinical pathological analysis of adenomatoid tumor in uterus and ovaries].

Authors:  L Zhu; B Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2001-02

5.  Surgical-pathological findings in type 1 and 2 endometrial cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study on GOG-210 protocol.

Authors:  William T Creasman; Shamshad Ali; David G Mutch; Richard J Zaino; Matthew A Powell; Robert S Mannel; Floor J Backes; Paul A DiSilvestro; Peter A Argenta; Michael L Pearl; Shashikant B Lele; Saketh R Guntupalli; Steven Waggoner; Nick Spirtos; John F Boggess; Robert P Edwards; Virginia L Filiaci; David S Miller
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Adenomatoid tumors of the female and male genital tracts express WT1.

Authors:  Erich J Schwartz; Teri A Longacre
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  Uterine Adenomatoid Tumors: A Study of Five Cases Including Three Cases of the Rare Leiomyoadenomatoid Variant.

Authors:  Richa Ranjan; Lavleen Singh; Devajit Nath; Mukund N Sable; Neena Malhotra; Neerja Bhatla; Sunesh Kumar; Siddhartha Datta Gupta
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-08-29

Review 8.  EZH2 inhibition in ARID1A mutated clear cell and endometrioid ovarian and endometrioid endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Jill K Alldredge; Ramez N Eskander
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Res Pract       Date:  2017-10-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.