Literature DB >> 33437427

Disentangling effects of disturbance severity and frequency: Does bioindication really work?

Remigiusz Pielech1,2, Patryk Czortek3.   

Abstract

Ecological disturbances are recognized as a crucial factor influencing the attributes of ecological communities. Depending on the specific adaptation or life cycle, plant species show different responses to disturbances of different magnitudes. Herben et al. (Journal of Vegetation Science, 27, 628-636) proposed six disturbance indicator values (DIVs) that describe the niches of Central-European plant species along gradients of disturbance frequency and severity. Here, we ask if the DIVs can be used in community ecology for bioindication of disturbance regime? We used a dataset of riparian forests sampled within mountain catchments (the Sudetes, SW Poland). As the regime of disturbance is driven by changes in floods from the spring toward the mouth, we calculated the position of every plot along longitudinal (upstream-downstream) gradient and used it as a proxy for the disturbance severity and frequency. We then calculated the community-weighted means (CWMs) for each of the six indices for each plot and analyzed whether these indices reflected the position of the plots along the rivers. We expected an increase in the severity indices and a decrease in the frequency indices downstream along the rivers. Moreover, we analyzed relationships between disturbance indices and species optima along longitudinal gradient. Surprisingly, means for all analyzed indices increased along the rivers. Severity indices showed the strongest association with the longitudinal gradient. The disturbance severity index for herbs was the only index that differed significantly among species with different responses along longitudinal gradient. On these results, we identified a strong correlation between the severity and frequency indices as the main problem. We conclude that the DIVs have considerable applicative potential; however, the determination of ecological niches separately for disturbance severity and frequency is difficult because different components interact to shape the realized niche of each species. All analyzed indices encompass different attributes of the disturbance regime including both severity and frequency.
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioindication; community ecology; disturbance; ecological indicator; flood; riparian forests

Year:  2020        PMID: 33437427      PMCID: PMC7790635          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   2.912


  11 in total

1.  Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world.

Authors:  Monica G Turner
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs.

Authors:  J H Connell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Riparian plant community responses to increased flooding: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Annemarie G Garssen; Annette Baattrup-Pedersen; Laurentius A C J Voesenek; Jos T A Verhoeven; Merel B Soons
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 10.863

Review 4.  Tracing the scientific trajectory of riparian vegetation studies: Main topics, approaches and needs in a globally changing world.

Authors:  Simon Dufour; Patricia Maria Rodríguez-González; Marianne Laslier
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Effects of increased flooding on riparian vegetation: Field experiments simulating climate change along five European lowland streams.

Authors:  Annemarie G Garssen; Annette Baattrup-Pedersen; Tenna Riis; Bart M Raven; Carl Christian Hoffman; Jos T A Verhoeven; Merel B Soons
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Natural forest remnants as refugia for bryophyte diversity in a transformed mountain river valley landscape.

Authors:  Sylwia Wierzcholska; Marcin K Dyderski; Remigiusz Pielech; Anna Gazda; Michał Smoczyk; Marek Malicki; Paweł Horodecki; Jacek Kamczyc; Maciej Skorupski; Mariusz Hachułka; Izabela Kałucka; Andrzej M Jagodziński
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Responses of Alnus glutinosa to anaerobic conditions--mechanisms and rate of oxygen flux into the roots.

Authors:  K Dittert; J Wötzel; B Sattelmacher
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.081

8.  Modeling the spatial and temporal dynamics of riparian vegetation induced by river flow fluctuation.

Authors:  Xiaoguang You; Jingling Liu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?

Authors:  Cassandra S James; Stephen J Mackay; Angela H Arthington; Samantha J Capon; Anna Barnes; Ben Pearson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Aquatic and riparian ecosystem recovery from debris flows in two western Washington streams, USA.

Authors:  Alex D Foster; Shannon M Claeson; Peter A Bisson; John Heimburg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.