Literature DB >> 33437415

Changes in beta diversity and species functional traits differ between saplings and mature trees in an old-growth forest.

David Anthony Kirk1, Marie-Hélène Brice2,3, Michael S Bradstreet4, Ken A Elliott5.   

Abstract

Invasion by generalist tree species can cause biotic homogenization, and such community impoverishment is likely more important in rare forest types. We quantified changes in tree diversity within Carolinian (range in Central Hardwood Forest), central (range in Central Hardwood Forest and Northern Hardwood-Conifer Forest), and northern species [range reached Northern-Conifer-Hardwood/closed Boreal (spruce-Fir) Forest] in an old forest tract in southern Canada at points surveyed 24 years apart. We asked: How did mature tree and sapling composition and abundance change for the three species' groups? Did those changes lead to biotic homogenization? Can species' changes be explained by community traits? We tested for differences in temporal and spatial tree β-diversity, as well as forest composition and structure, using univariate/multivariate analyses and a community trait-based approach to identify drivers of change. Major increases occurred in abundance for mature Acer rubrum (northern), while other species decreased (Fraxinus americana, Populus grandidentata); declines were found in A. saccharinum (central) and Cornus florida (Carolinian). Species composition of saplings, but not mature trees, changed due to replacement; no evidence for biotic homogenization existed in either cohort. As a group, northern mature tree species increased significantly, while central species decreased; saplings of pooled Carolinian species also declined. Shade tolerance in mature trees increased, reflecting successional changes, while drought tolerance decreased, perhaps due to changing temperatures, altered precipitation or ground water levels. Saplings showed declines in all traits, probably because of compositional change. Our results demonstrated that saplings can more closely reflect change in forest dynamics than mature trees, especially over short time periods. Based on sapling trends, this remnant could ultimately transition to a mesophytic hardwood stand dominated by A. rubrum and other shade-tolerant species, creating a more homogeneous forest. While encouraging regeneration for Carolinian and central tree species could ensure high levels of diversity are conserved in the future, it is important to balance this with the primary management goal of maintaining the forest's old-growth characteristics.
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carolinian forest; Ontario; community traits; homogenization; old‐growth forests; protected areas; species at risk; temporal change; β‐diversity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33437415      PMCID: PMC7790643          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   2.912


  29 in total

1.  Tempering threats to temperate forests.

Authors:  Donald Waller; Jeremy Ash; Alison Paulson; Grégory Sonnier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Birds are tracking climate warming, but not fast enough.

Authors:  Vincent Devictor; Romain Julliard; Denis Couvet; Frédéric Jiguet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming.

Authors:  Pieter De Frenne; Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez; David Anthony Coomes; Lander Baeten; Gorik Verstraeten; Mark Vellend; Markus Bernhardt-Römermann; Carissa D Brown; Jörg Brunet; Johnny Cornelis; Guillaume M Decocq; Hartmut Dierschke; Ove Eriksson; Frank S Gilliam; Radim Hédl; Thilo Heinken; Martin Hermy; Patrick Hommel; Michael A Jenkins; Daniel L Kelly; Keith J Kirby; Fraser J G Mitchell; Tobias Naaf; Miles Newman; George Peterken; Petr Petrík; Jan Schultz; Grégory Sonnier; Hans Van Calster; Donald M Waller; Gian-Reto Walther; Peter S White; Kerry D Woods; Monika Wulf; Bente Jessen Graae; Kris Verheyen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Taxonomic homogenization of woodland plant communities over 70 years.

Authors:  Sally A Keith; Adrian C Newton; Michael D Morecroft; Clive E Bealey; James M Bullock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Should Environmental Filtering be Abandoned?

Authors:  Marc W Cadotte; Caroline M Tucker
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Seed size and shade-tolerance: a comparative analysis of North American temperate trees.

Authors:  Nina Hewitt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Drought timing and local climate determine the sensitivity of eastern temperate forests to drought.

Authors:  Loïc D'Orangeville; Justin Maxwell; Daniel Kneeshaw; Neil Pederson; Louis Duchesne; Travis Logan; Daniel Houle; Dominique Arseneault; Colin M Beier; Daniel A Bishop; Daniel Druckenbrod; Shawn Fraver; François Girard; Joshua Halman; Chris Hansen; Justin L Hart; Henrik Hartmann; Margot Kaye; David Leblanc; Stefano Manzoni; Rock Ouimet; Shelly Rayback; Christine R Rollinson; Richard P Phillips
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Shifts in southern Wisconsin forest canopy and understory richness, composition, and heterogeneity.

Authors:  David A Rogers; Thomas P Rooney; Daniel Olson; Donald M Waller
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species.

Authors:  Lars Gamfeldt; Tord Snäll; Robert Bagchi; Micael Jonsson; Lena Gustafsson; Petter Kjellander; María C Ruiz-Jaen; Mats Fröberg; Johan Stendahl; Christopher D Philipson; Grzegorz Mikusiński; Erik Andersson; Bertil Westerlund; Henrik Andrén; Fredrik Moberg; Jon Moen; Jan Bengtsson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Sapling growth rates reveal conspecific negative density dependence in a temperate forest.

Authors:  Benjamin S Ramage; Daniel J Johnson; Erika Gonzalez-Akre; William J McShea; Kristina J Anderson-Teixeira; Norman A Bourg; Keith Clay
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.