| Literature DB >> 33437160 |
Jing Xu1, Hairong Liu1, Guangyue Su1,2, Meng Ding1, Wei Wang1, Jincai Lu3, Xiuli Bi4, Yuqing Zhao1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Panax ginseng Meyer has been used as a nourishing edible herb in East Asia for thousands of years. 25-OH-PPT was first discovered as a natural rare triterpenoid saponin in ginseng stems and leaves by our group. Research found that it showed strong inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B, and protected cardiocytes (H9c2) through PI3K/Akt pathway.Entities:
Keywords: 25-hydroxyl-protopanaxatriol, 25-OH-PPT, 20 (R)-dammaran-3β, 6α, 12β, 20, 25-pentol; AMPK, adenylate-activated protein kinase; AUC, area under the curve; BCA, bicinchoninic acid; BSA, bovine serum albumin; COX2, cyclo-oxygenase 2; DM, diabetes mellitus; GLUT4, glucose transporter 4; Ginseng; IL-1, interleukin-1; IL-6, interleukin-6; INSR, insulin receptor; IPGTT, intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test; IR, insulin receptor; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate-1; Insulin resistance; Macroporous resin; STZ, streptozotocin; T2DM; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α
Year: 2019 PMID: 33437160 PMCID: PMC7791145 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2019.11.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ginseng Res ISSN: 1226-8453 Impact factor: 6.060
Fig. 1The chemical structure of 25-OH-PPT.
Parameters of four different resins
| Macroporous resin | AB-8 | D101 | HPD-100 | HPD-600 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polarity | Weak-polar | Nonpolar | Nonpolar | polar |
| Surface area(m2/g) | 480–520 | ≥400 | 650–700 | 550–600 |
| Average pore diameter (nm) | 130–140 | 100–110 | 85–90 | 80 |
| Particle diameter (mm) | 0.3–1.25 | 0.3–1.25 | 0.3–1.2 | 0.3–1.2 |
Results of gradient elution of 25-OH-PPT on the HPD-100 resin
| Concentration of ethanol (%) | Mass of dried residue (mg) | Mass of 25-OH-PPT (mg) | Content of 25-OH-PPT (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.92 | - | - |
| 10 | 2.93 | - | - |
| 20 | 182.54 | 1.84 | 1.01 |
| 30 | 94.42 | 15.84 | 16.78 |
| 40 | 50.73 | 40.79 | 80.41 |
| 50 | 36.72 | 16.75 | 45.62 |
| 60 | 88.16 | 8.37 | 9.49 |
| 70 | 46.39 | 2.32 | 5.00 |
| 80 | 56.94 | 0.28 | 0.49 |
| 90 | 35.43 | - | - |
| Acid hydrolysates | 12.5 |
Fig. 2HPLC chromatograms of the extracts before purification using macroporous resins (A); 25-OH-PPT (T19) after recrystallization from methanol (B). The peak indicated with an asterisk (*) is the 25-OH-PPT peak.
Fig. 3Effect of 25-OH-PPT (T19) on body weight; blood glucose in STZ-induced hyperglycemic mice (n = 10/group) (A) and DB/DB mice (n = 6/group) (B) (Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. ctrl, **p < 0.01 vs. ctrl, #p < 0.05 vs. model, ##p < 0.01 vs. model.)
Fig. 4Effect of 25-OH-PPT (T19) on IPGTT in STZ-induced hyperglycemic mice (n = 10/group) (A) and DB/DB mice (n = 6/group) (B) (Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. ctrl, **p < 0.01 vs. ctrl, #p < 0.05 vs. model, ##p < 0.01 vs. model.)
Fig. 5Effects of 25-OH-PPT (T19) on serum TG and TC levels (A) and organ index (B) in STZ-induced diabetic mice (n = 10/group) and DB/DB mice (n = 6/group) (C, D) (Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs ctrl, **p < 0.01 vs. ctrl, #p < 0.05 vs. model, ##p < 0.01 vs. model).
Fig. 6Effect of 25-OH-PPT on liver pathology in DB/DB mice; A: blank control group 40X, A1: 10X; B: model group (DB/DB) 40X, B1: 10X; C: 25-OH-PPT group 40X, C1: 10X; D: positive drug rosiglitazone group 40X, D1: 10X.
Fig. 7Effect of 25-OH-PPT (T19) on the mRNA relative expression of hepatic inflammatory factors in STZ-induced diabetic mice (n = 10/group) (A) and DB/DB mice (n = 6/group) (B) (Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. ctrl, **p < 0.01 vs. ctrl, #p < 0.05 vs. model, ##p < 0.01 vs. model).
Fig. 8Effect of 25-OH-PPT (T19) on the mRNA relative expression of GLUT4 and AMPK in skeletal muscle of STZ-induced diabetic mice (n = 10/group) (A) and DB/DB mice (n = 6/group) (B) (Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs. ctrl, **p < 0.01 vs. ctrl, #p < 0.05 vs. model, ##p < 0.01 vs. model); The effects of 25-OH-PPT (T19) on the expression of insulin signaling pathway protein in STZ-induced diabetic mice and DB/DB mice (C). Quantification of protein expression. (Data are presented as the means ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with model) (D).