Literature DB >> 33436896

Individual fate and gut microbiome composition in the European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Gerard Funosas1, Xavier Triadó-Margarit1, Francisca Castro2, Rafael Villafuerte3, Miguel Delibes-Mateos3, Carlos Rouco4, Emilio O Casamayor5.   

Abstract

Studies connecting microbiome composition and functional performance in wildlife have received little attention and understanding their connections with wildlife physical condition are sorely needed. We studied the variation in gut microbiota (hard fecal pellets) between allopatric subspecies of the European wild rabbit in wild populations and in captured individuals studied under captivity. We evaluated the influence of environmental and host-specific factors. The microbiome of wild rabbit populations reduced its heterogeneity under controlled conditions. None of the host-specific factors tested correlated with the microbiota composition. We only observed significant intra-group dispersion for the age factor. The most diverse microbiomes were rich in Ruminococcaceae potentially holding an enriched functional profile with dominance of cellulases and xylanases, and suggesting higher efficiency in the digestion of fiber-rich food. Conversely, low diversity gut microbiomes showed dominance of Enterobacteriaceae potentially rich in amylases. We preliminary noticed geographical variations in field populations with higher dominance of Ruminococcaceae in south-western than in north-eastern Spain. Spatial differences appeared not to be subspecies driven, since they were lost in captivity, but environmentally driven, although differences in social structure and behavior may also play a role that deserve further investigations. A marginally significant relationship between the Ruminococcaceae/Enterobacteriaceae ratio and potential life expectancy was observed in captive rabbits. We hypothesize that the gut microbiome may determine the efficiency of feeding resource exploitation, and can also be a potential proxy for life expectancy, with potential applications for the management of declining wild herbivorous populations. Such hypotheses remain to be explored in the future.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436896      PMCID: PMC7804928          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80782-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  39 in total

1.  High-diversity biofilm for the oxidation of sulfide-containing effluents.

Authors:  I Ferrera; R Massana; E O Casamayor; V Balagué; O Sánchez; C Pedrós-Alió; J Mas
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Endemic plant species are more palatable to introduced herbivores than non-endemics.

Authors:  Jonay Cubas; Severin D H Irl; Rafael Villafuerte; Víctor Bello-Rodríguez; Juan Luis Rodríguez-Luengo; Marcelino Del Arco; José Luís Martín-Esquivel; Juana María González-Mancebo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Hydrogenotrophic culture enrichment reveals rumen Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae acetogens and hydrogen-responsive Bacteroidetes from pasture-fed cattle.

Authors:  Emma J Gagen; Jagadish Padmanabha; Stuart E Denman; Christopher S McSweeney
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Group Living and Male Dispersal Predict the Core Gut Microbiome in Wild Baboons.

Authors:  Laura E Grieneisen; Josh Livermore; Susan Alberts; Jenny Tung; Elizabeth A Archie
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  Host-mediated inflammation disrupts the intestinal microbiota and promotes the overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Claudia Lupp; Marilyn L Robertson; Mark E Wickham; Inna Sekirov; Olivia L Champion; Erin C Gaynor; B Brett Finlay
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 21.023

6.  Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data.

Authors:  Kathrin P Aßhauer; Bernd Wemheuer; Rolf Daniel; Peter Meinicke
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Pika Population Density Is Associated with the Composition and Diversity of Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Huan Li; Jiapeng Qu; Tongtong Li; Jiabao Li; Qiang Lin; Xiangzhen Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Amphibian gut microbiota shifts differentially in community structure but converges on habitat-specific predicted functions.

Authors:  Molly C Bletz; Daniel J Goedbloed; Eugenia Sanchez; Timm Reinhardt; Christoph C Tebbe; Sabin Bhuju; Robert Geffers; Michael Jarek; Miguel Vences; Sebastian Steinfartz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Gut microbiota of the European Brown Hare (Lepus europaeus).

Authors:  G L Stalder; B Pinior; B Zwirzitz; I Loncaric; D Jakupović; S G Vetter; S Smith; A Posautz; F Hoelzl; M Wagner; D Hoffmann; A Kübber-Heiss; E Mann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of captivity, diet, and relocation on the gut bacterial communities of white-footed mice.

Authors:  Pauline van Leeuwen; Nadia Mykytczuk; Gabriela F Mastromonaco; Albrecht I Schulte-Hostedde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diverse methanogens, bacteria and tannase genes in the feces of the endangered volcano rabbit (Romerolagus diazi).

Authors:  Leslie M Montes-Carreto; José Luis Aguirre-Noyola; Itzel A Solís-García; Jorge Ortega; Esperanza Martinez-Romero; José Antonio Guerrero
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Synchronous Seasonality in the Gut Microbiota of Wild Mouse Populations.

Authors:  Kirsty J Marsh; Aura M Raulo; Marc Brouard; Tanya Troitsky; Holly M English; Bryony Allen; Rohan Raval; Saudamini Venkatesan; Amy B Pedersen; Joanne P Webster; Sarah C L Knowles
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.