Literature DB >> 33436821

Association of nocebo hyperalgesia and basic somatosensory characteristics in a large cohort.

Mari Hanna Feldhaus1, Björn Horing2, Christian Sprenger2,3, Christian Büchel2.   

Abstract

Medical outcomes are strongly affected by placebo and nocebo effects. Prediction of who responds to such expectation effects has proven to be challenging. Most recent approaches to prediction have focused on placebo effects in the context of previous treatment experiences and expectancies, or personality traits. However, a recent model has suggested that basic somatosensory characteristics play an important role in expectation responses. Consequently, this study investigated not only the role of psychological variables, but also of basic somatosensory characteristics. In this study, 624 participants underwent a placebo and nocebo heat pain paradigm. Additionally, individual psychological and somatosensory characteristics were assessed. While no associations were identified for placebo responses, nocebo responses were associated with personality traits (e.g. neuroticism) and somatosensory characteristics (e.g. thermal pain threshold). Importantly, the associations between somatosensory characteristics and nocebo responses were among the strongest. This study shows that apart from personality traits, basic somatosensory characteristics play an important role in individual nocebo responses, in agreement with the novel idea that nocebo responses result from the integration of top-down expectation and bottom-up sensory information.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436821      PMCID: PMC7804006          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80386-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  49 in total

1.  Identifying careless responses in survey data.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; S Bartholomew Craig
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-04-16

2.  Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials.

Authors:  R Rolke; W Magerl; K Andrews Campbell; C Schalber; S Caspari; F Birklein; R-D Treede
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 3.  The nocebo effect: a clinical challenge in the era of biosimilars.

Authors:  Lieven Pouillon; Marie Socha; Beatrice Demore; Nathalie Thilly; Vered Abitbol; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.473

4.  The Clinical Inadequacy of the Placebo Model and the Development of an Alternative Conceptual Framework.

Authors:  Giovanni A Fava; Jenny Guidi; Chiara Rafanelli; Karl Rickels
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 17.659

Review 5.  Bad is more powerful than good: the nocebo response in medical consultations.

Authors:  Maddy Greville-Harris; Paul Dieppe
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  The effects of experimenter characteristics on pain reports in women and men.

Authors:  Ibolya Kállai; Antonia Barke; Ursula Voss
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Facilitation of pain in the human spinal cord by nocebo treatment.

Authors:  Stephan Geuter; Christian Büchel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Non-pharmacological Effects in Switching Medication: The Nocebo Effect in Switching from Originator to Biosimilar Agent.

Authors:  Lars Erik Kristensen; Rieke Alten; Luis Puig; Sandra Philipp; Tore K Kvien; Maria Antonia Mangues; Frank van den Hoogen; Karel Pavelka; Arnold G Vulto
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 9.  Placebo and Nocebo Effects Across Symptoms: From Pain to Fatigue, Dyspnea, Nausea, and Itch.

Authors:  Fabian Wolters; Kaya J Peerdeman; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus.

Authors:  Andrea W M Evers; Luana Colloca; Charlotte Blease; Marco Annoni; Lauren Y Atlas; Fabrizio Benedetti; Ulrike Bingel; Christian Büchel; Claudia Carvalho; Ben Colagiuri; Alia J Crum; Paul Enck; Jens Gaab; Andrew L Geers; Jeremy Howick; Karin B Jensen; Irving Kirsch; Karin Meissner; Vitaly Napadow; Kaya J Peerdeman; Amir Raz; Winfried Rief; Lene Vase; Tor D Wager; Bruce E Wampold; Katja Weimer; Katja Wiech; Ted J Kaptchuk; Regine Klinger; John M Kelley
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 17.659

View more
  4 in total

1.  The temporal and spectral characteristics of expectations and prediction errors in pain and thermoception.

Authors:  Andreas Strube; Michael Rose; Sepideh Fazeli; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Do individual psychological characteristics predict induction and generalization of nocebo and placebo effects on pain and itch?

Authors:  Lingling Weng; Antoinette I M van Laarhoven; Kaya J Peerdeman; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 5.435

3.  A comparison of placebo and nocebo effects on objective and subjective postural stability: a double-edged sword?

Authors:  Katherine Russell; Michael Duncan; Michael Price; Amber Mosewich; Toby Ellmers; Mathew Hill
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Possible alleviation of symptoms and side effects through clinicians' nocebo information and empathy in an experimental video vignette study.

Authors:  M C Meijers; J Stouthard; A W M Evers; E Das; H J Drooger; S J A J Jansen; A L Francke; N Plum; E van der Wall; Y Nestoriuc; E Dusseldorp; L M van Vliet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.