Literature DB >> 33436770

Multiple life-stage inbreeding depression impacts demography and extinction risk in an extinct-in-the-wild species.

A E Trask1, G M Ferrie2, J Wang3, S Newland4, S Canessa5, A Moehrenschlager6, M Laut7, L Barnhart Duenas8, J G Ewen3.   

Abstract

Inbreeding can depress individuals' fitness traits and reduce population viability. However, studies that directly translate inbreeding depression on fitness traits into consequences for population viability, and further, into consequences for management choices, are lacking. Here, we estimated impacts of inbreeding depression (B, lethal equivalents) across life-history stages for an extinct-in-the-wild species, the sihek (Guam kingfisher, Todiramphus cinnamominus). We then projected population growth under different management alternatives with our B estimates incorporated, as well as without inbreeding depression (B = 0) or with a conventional default B. We found that inbreeding depression severely impacted multiple life-history stages, and directly translated into an effect on population viability under management alternatives. Simulations including our B estimates indicated rapid population decline, whereas projections without inbreeding depression or with default B suggested very gradual population decline. Further, our results demonstrate that incorporation of B across life-history stages can influence management decisions, as projections with our B estimates suggested a need to switch to increased breeding management to avoid species extinction and support wild releases. Our results demonstrate that magnitude of B across life-history stages can translate into demographic consequences, such that incorporation of multiple life-stage B into population models can be important for informed conservation management decision-making.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436770      PMCID: PMC7804286          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79979-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  34 in total

1.  Inbreeding depression and genetic load in laboratory metapopulations of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  C van Oosterhout; W G Zijlstra; M K van Heuven; P M Brakefield
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour?

Authors:  Mark J Whittingham; Philip A Stephens; Richard B Bradbury; Robert P Freckleton
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Age-specific inbreeding depression and components of genetic variance in relation to the evolution of senescence.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; K A Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sex-specific effects of inbreeding on reproductive senescence.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Marcel Eens; Wendt Müller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Inbreeding load and purging: implications for the short-term survival and the conservation management of small populations.

Authors:  A Caballero; I Bravo; J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Inbreeding depression accumulation across life-history stages of the endangered Takahe.

Authors:  Catherine E Grueber; Rebecca J Laws; Shinichi Nakagawa; Ian G Jamieson
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  Inbreeding depression across the lifespan in a wild mammal population.

Authors:  Jisca Huisman; Loeske E B Kruuk; Philip A Ellis; Tim Clutton-Brock; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Inbreeding depression along a life-history continuum in the great tit.

Authors:  M Szulkin; D Garant; R H McCleery; B C Sheldon
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Linking inbreeding effects in captive populations with fitness in the wild: release of replicated Drosophila melanogaster lines under different temperatures.

Authors:  Torsten N Kristensen; Volker Loeschcke; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  Nonequivalent lethal equivalents: Models and inbreeding metrics for unbiased estimation of inbreeding load.

Authors:  Pirmin Nietlisbach; Stefanie Muff; Jane M Reid; Michael C Whitlock; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.183

View more
  1 in total

1.  African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) from the Kruger National Park, South Africa are currently not inbred but have low genomic diversity.

Authors:  Christina Meiring; Haiko Schurz; Paul van Helden; Eileen Hoal; Gerard Tromp; Craig Kinnear; Léanie Kleynhans; Brigitte Glanzmann; Louis van Schalkwyk; Michele Miller; Marlo Möller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.