Literature DB >> 33436752

Intentional synchronisation affects automatic imitation and source memory.

Liam Cross1, Gray Atherton2, Natalie Sebanz3.   

Abstract

Acting in synchrony is a fundamental part of many social interactions and can have pro-social consequences. Explanations for this relationship were investigated here using implicit measures of imitation (automatic imitation task) and memory (preference overlap task). In Study 1, participants performed an intentional synchronisation task where they moved sliders in or out of time with another person while a third person observed. Those who had moved in synchrony showed a stronger tendency to imitate their partner's actions than those who had moved in a non-synchronous way. Similarly, coordinated partners were also more likely to share object preferences. Results also showed that rather than memory blurring between co-actors, participants had improved memories for the self. Study 2 exchanged intentional for incidental coordination (coordinating with a synchronous metronome). None of the findings from Study 1 replicated when synchronisation was incidental rather than intentional, suggesting that having a shared goal may be critical for triggering effects of synchronisation on imitation tendencies and memory. Together these findings favour explanations related to changes in social categorisation over representational overlap between co-actors.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436752      PMCID: PMC7804244          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79796-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  37 in total

1.  Automatic imitation? Imitative compatibility affects responses at high perceptual load.

Authors:  Caroline Catmur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  I'll just watch: Do the pro-social effects of coordination really generalize to non-actors?

Authors:  Liam Cross; Andrew D Wilson; Sabrina Golonka
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-06-18

3.  Sync to link: Endorphin-mediated synchrony effects on cooperation.

Authors:  Martin Lang; Vladimír Bahna; John H Shaver; Paul Reddish; Dimitris Xygalatas
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Still want to help? Interpersonal coordination's effects on helping behaviour after a 24 hour delay.

Authors:  Liam Cross; John Michael; Luke Wilsdon; Agnes Henson; Gray Atherton
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2020-05-19

5.  Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination.

Authors:  Michael J Richardson; Kerry L Marsh; Robert W Isenhower; Justin R L Goodman; R C Schmidt
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Individual differences in social and non-social cognitive control.

Authors:  Kohinoor M Darda; Emily E Butler; Richard Ramsey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-05-24

7.  Imagined Steps: Mental Simulation of Coordinated Rhythmic Movements Effects on Pro-sociality.

Authors:  Liam Cross; Gray Atherton; Andrew D Wilson; Sabrina Golonka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-13

8.  Joint attention, shared goals, and social bonding.

Authors:  Wouter Wolf; Jacques Launay; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2015-08-10

9.  Conditional effects of gaze on automatic imitation: the role of autistic traits.

Authors:  Irene Trilla; Hannah Wnendt; Isabel Dziobek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Synchronicities that shape the perception of joint action.

Authors:  Luke McEllin; Günther Knoblich; Natalie Sebanz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Social context facilitates visuomotor synchrony and bonding in children and adults.

Authors:  Ellen M Howard; Danielle Ropar; Roger Newport; Bahar Tunçgenç
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.