| Literature DB >> 33436683 |
Toshinori Murata1, Mineo Kondo2, Makoto Inoue3, Shintaro Nakao4, Rie Osaka5, Chieko Shiragami5, Kenji Sogawa6, Akikazu Mochizuki7, Rumiko Shiraga7, Yohei Ohashi7, Takeumi Kaneko7, Chikatapu Chandrasekhar8, Akitaka Tsujikawa9, Motohiro Kamei10.
Abstract
The ZIPANGU study assessed the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab as a one loading dose + pro re nata (one + PRN) regimen with/without focal/grid laser among treatment-naïve patients suffering from macular edema (ME) following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). ZIPANGU was a phase IV, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, 12-month, two-arm, multicenter study. Treatment-naïve patients with visual impairment (19-73 letters) caused by ME, defined as central subfield thickness (CSFT) > 300 µm, due to BRVO were randomly assigned to ranibizumab monotherapy (n = 29) or combination therapy (ranibizumab + focal/grid short-pulse laser, n = 30). The primary endpoint was the number of ranibizumab injections. Secondary endpoints were mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CSFT, and safety. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean number of ranibizumab injections between monotherapy (4.3 injections) vs. combination (4.1 injections) therapy, or in CSFT. BCVA improvement in the monotherapy arm (22.0 letters) was better than the combination therapy arm (15.0 letters) (p = 0.035). Overall, both regimens appeared to be safe and well tolerated. One + PRN ranibizumab is safe and efficacious in treatment-naïve patients with ME secondary to BRVO. A conjunctive laser treatment did not lead to better functional outcomes or fewer ranibizumab injections.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33436683 PMCID: PMC7804316 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79051-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379