Literature DB >> 33436562

Multiplexed characterization of rationally designed promoter architectures deconstructs combinatorial logic for IPTG-inducible systems.

Timothy C Yu1, Winnie L Liu2, Marcia S Brinck3, Jessica E Davis4, Jeremy Shek4, Grace Bower2, Tal Einav5, Kimberly D Insigne6, Rob Phillips5,7,8, Sriram Kosuri9,10,11,12,13,14, Guillaume Urtecho15.   

Abstract

A crucial step towards engineering biological systems is the ability to precisely tune the genetic response to environmental stimuli. In the case of Escherichia coli inducible promoters, our incomplete understanding of the relationship between sequence composition and gene expression hinders our ability to predictably control transcriptional responses. Here, we profile the expression dynamics of 8269 rationally designed, IPTG-inducible promoters that collectively explore the individual and combinatorial effects of RNA polymerase and LacI repressor binding site strengths. We then fit a statistical mechanics model to measured expression that accurately models gene expression and reveals properties of theoretically optimal inducible promoters. Furthermore, we characterize three alternative promoter architectures and show that repositioning binding sites within promoters influences the types of combinatorial effects observed between promoter elements. In total, this approach enables us to deconstruct relationships between inducible promoter elements and discover practical insights for engineering inducible promoters with desirable characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33436562      PMCID: PMC7804116          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20094-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  71 in total

1.  Control of gal transcription through DNA looping: inhibition of the initial transcribing complex.

Authors:  H E Choy; S Adhya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering.

Authors:  Hal Alper; Curt Fischer; Elke Nevoigt; Gregory Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models.

Authors:  Lacramioara Bintu; Nicolas E Buchler; Hernan G Garcia; Ulrich Gerland; Terence Hwa; Jané Kondev; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  Repression of lac promoter as a function of distance, phase and quality of an auxiliary lac operator.

Authors:  J Müller; S Oehler; B Müller-Hill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-03-22       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Escherichia coli "Marionette" strains with 12 highly optimized small-molecule sensors.

Authors:  Adam J Meyer; Thomas H Segall-Shapiro; Emerson Glassey; Jing Zhang; Christopher A Voigt
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 15.040

6.  The three operators of the lac operon cooperate in repression.

Authors:  S Oehler; E R Eismann; H Krämer; B Müller-Hill
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Massively parallel decoding of mammalian regulatory sequences supports a flexible organizational model.

Authors:  Robin P Smith; Leila Taher; Rupali P Patwardhan; Mee J Kim; Fumitaka Inoue; Jay Shendure; Ivan Ovcharenko; Nadav Ahituv
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Predicting the strength of UP-elements and full-length E. coli σE promoters.

Authors:  Virgil A Rhodius; Vivek K Mutalik; Carol A Gross
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Large-scale mapping of gene regulatory logic reveals context-dependent repression by transcriptional activators.

Authors:  David van Dijk; Eilon Sharon; Maya Lotan-Pompan; Adina Weinberger; Eran Segal; Lucas B Carey
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  How the avidity of polymerase binding to the -35/-10 promoter sites affects gene expression.

Authors:  Tal Einav; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Competitive dCas9 binding as a mechanism for transcriptional control.

Authors:  Daniel A Anderson; Christopher A Voigt
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 11.429

2.  The transcription activator AtxA from Bacillus anthracis was employed for developing a tight-control, high-level, modulable and stationary-phase-specific transcription activity in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ying-Xing Liu; Xiao-Zhen Zhuo; Si-Yu Li
Journal:  Synth Biol (Oxf)       Date:  2022-08-17

3.  Automated model-predictive design of synthetic promoters to control transcriptional profiles in bacteria.

Authors:  Travis L LaFleur; Ayaan Hossain; Howard M Salis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Phage-Assisted Continuous Evolution and Selection of Enzymes for Chemical Synthesis.

Authors:  Krysten A Jones; Harrison M Snodgrass; Ketaki Belsare; Bryan C Dickinson; Jared C Lewis
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 14.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.