Beomyoung Cho1, Jana L Hirschtick2, Bukola Usidame1, Rafael Meza1, Ritesh Mistry3, Stephanie R Land4, David T Levy5, Theodore Holford6, Nancy L Fleischer1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: janahirs@umich.edu. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 6. Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examines sociodemographic patterns of exclusive/dual/polytobacco use among U.S. high school students using multiple national surveys. METHODS: Using three national youth surveys (Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health [PATH] Wave 4 [2016-2017], 2017 Youth Risk Behavior Survey, and 2017 National Youth Tobacco Survey), we classified tobacco products into four groups: (1) electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), (2) conventional cigarettes (CCs), (3) other combustible tobacco products, and (4) smokeless tobacco products. We created 16 categories of non/exclusive/dual/polytobacco use within the past 30 days using the four product groups and calculated weighted population prevalence by sex and race/ethnicity (all surveys) and parental education and income (PATH), based on variable availability. RESULTS: The results from 9,331, 12,407, and 9,699 high school students in PATH, Youth Risk Behavior Survey, and National Youth Tobacco Survey, respectively, largely agreed and pointed to similar conclusions. ENDS was the most prevalent exclusive use product (3.8%-5.2% across surveys), with CCs falling to second or third (1.2%-2.0% across surveys). By sex, exclusive, dual, and poly smokeless tobacco product use were more common for males, whereas exclusive CC use was more common for females. By race/ethnicity, non-Hispanic Whites had a higher prevalence of exclusive ENDS use and ENDS/CC dual use than non-Hispanic Blacks. As income and parental education levels increased from low to high, the prevalence of exclusive CC use decreased, whereas the prevalence of exclusive ENDS use increased. CONCLUSION: Understanding sociodemographic patterns of tobacco use can help identify groups who may be at greater risk for tobacco-related health outcomes.
PURPOSE: This study examines sociodemographic patterns of exclusive/dual/polytobacco use among U.S. high school students using multiple national surveys. METHODS: Using three national youth surveys (Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health [PATH] Wave 4 [2016-2017], 2017 Youth Risk Behavior Survey, and 2017 National Youth Tobacco Survey), we classified tobacco products into four groups: (1) electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), (2) conventional cigarettes (CCs), (3) other combustible tobacco products, and (4) smokeless tobacco products. We created 16 categories of non/exclusive/dual/polytobacco use within the past 30 days using the four product groups and calculated weighted population prevalence by sex and race/ethnicity (all surveys) and parental education and income (PATH), based on variable availability. RESULTS: The results from 9,331, 12,407, and 9,699 high school students in PATH, Youth Risk Behavior Survey, and National Youth Tobacco Survey, respectively, largely agreed and pointed to similar conclusions. ENDS was the most prevalent exclusive use product (3.8%-5.2% across surveys), with CCs falling to second or third (1.2%-2.0% across surveys). By sex, exclusive, dual, and poly smokeless tobacco product use were more common for males, whereas exclusive CC use was more common for females. By race/ethnicity, non-Hispanic Whites had a higher prevalence of exclusive ENDS use and ENDS/CC dual use than non-Hispanic Blacks. As income and parental education levels increased from low to high, the prevalence of exclusive CC use decreased, whereas the prevalence of exclusive ENDS use increased. CONCLUSION: Understanding sociodemographic patterns of tobacco use can help identify groups who may be at greater risk for tobacco-related health outcomes.
Authors: Maria A Parker; Andrea C Villanti; Amanda J Quisenberry; Cassandra A Stanton; Nathan J Doogan; Ryan Redner; Diann E Gaalema; Allison N Kurti; Tyler Nighbor; Megan E Roberts; Antonio Cepeda-Benito; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jessica L King; David Reboussin; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Kimberly D Wiseman; Kimberly G Wagoner; Erin L Sutfin Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: David B Abrams; Allison M Glasser; Jennifer L Pearson; Andrea C Villanti; Lauren K Collins; Raymond S Niaura Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Samir Soneji; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Thomas A Wills; Adam M Leventhal; Jennifer B Unger; Laura A Gibson; JaeWon Yang; Brian A Primack; Judy A Andrews; Richard A Miech; Tory R Spindle; Danielle M Dick; Thomas Eissenberg; Robert C Hornik; Rui Dang; James D Sargent Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: David J Nutt; Lawrence D Phillips; David Balfour; H Valerie Curran; Martin Dockrell; Jonathan Foulds; Karl Fagerstrom; Kgosi Letlape; Anders Milton; Riccardo Polosa; John Ramsey; David Sweanor Journal: Eur Addict Res Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Kaitlyn M Berry; Jessica L Fetterman; Emelia J Benjamin; Aruni Bhatnagar; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Adam M Leventhal; Andrew Stokes Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-02-01
Authors: Katelyn F Romm; Margaret G Childers; Ashley E Douglas; Bethany C Bray; Geri Dino; Melissa D Blank Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Bukola Usidame; Jana Hirschtick; Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Delvon T Mattingly; Akash Patel; Rafael Meza; David T Levy; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2021-09-20
Authors: David C Colston; Yanmei Xie; Megan E Patrick; James F Thrasher; Andrea R Titus; Michael R Elliott; David T Levy; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2022-03-19
Authors: Anca Maria Pop; Raluca Coroș; Alexandra Mihaela Stoica; Monica Monea Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Adriana Pérez; Arnold E Kuk; Meagan A Bluestein; Hui Min Shirlyn Sia; Baojiang Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bukola Usidame; Jana L Hirschtick; Delvon T Mattingly; Akash Patel; Megan E Patrick; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Akash Patel; Jana L Hirschtick; Steven Cook; Bukola Usidame; Ritesh Mistry; David T Levy; Rafael Meza; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 3.390