Marina R Ekkel1, Marja F I A Depla2, Els M L Verschuur3, Ruth B Veenhuizen2,4, Cees M P M Hertogh2, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen5. 1. Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.ekkel@amsterdamumc.nl. 2. Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 4. Huntington Expert Centre Atlant, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute (APH), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Huntington's disease (HD) has a poor prognosis. Decision-making capacity and communication ability may become lost as the disease progresses. Therefore, HD patients are encouraged to engage in advance care planning (ACP). To improve ACP for HD patients, there is a need to better understand how these patients face their poor prognosis. AIM: To gain insight into the views of HD patients who receive outpatient care regarding their future and the way they deal with the poor prognosis of their disease. METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 12 patients with HD (7 outpatient clinic, 3 day care, 2 assisted living facility). Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Through reading and re-reading interviews, writing memos and discussions in the research team, strategies were identified. RESULTS: Three strategies emerged for facing a future with HD. Participants saw the future: 1) as a period that you have to prepare for; 2) as a period that you would rather not think about; 3) as a period that you do not have to worry about yet. Participants could adopt more than one strategy at a time. Even though participants realized that they would deteriorate and would need more care in the future, they tried to keep this knowledge 'at a distance', with the motivation of keeping daily life as manageable as possible. CONCLUSIONS: Official ACP guidelines recommend discussing goals and preferences for future treatment and care, but patients tend to want to live in the present. Further research is needed to elucidate the best approach to deal with this discrepancy.
BACKGROUND:Huntington's disease (HD) has a poor prognosis. Decision-making capacity and communication ability may become lost as the disease progresses. Therefore, HDpatients are encouraged to engage in advance care planning (ACP). To improve ACP for HDpatients, there is a need to better understand how these patients face their poor prognosis. AIM: To gain insight into the views of HDpatients who receive outpatient care regarding their future and the way they deal with the poor prognosis of their disease. METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 12 patients with HD (7 outpatient clinic, 3 day care, 2 assisted living facility). Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Through reading and re-reading interviews, writing memos and discussions in the research team, strategies were identified. RESULTS: Three strategies emerged for facing a future with HD. Participants saw the future: 1) as a period that you have to prepare for; 2) as a period that you would rather not think about; 3) as a period that you do not have to worry about yet. Participants could adopt more than one strategy at a time. Even though participants realized that they would deteriorate and would need more care in the future, they tried to keep this knowledge 'at a distance', with the motivation of keeping daily life as manageable as possible. CONCLUSIONS: Official ACP guidelines recommend discussing goals and preferences for future treatment and care, but patients tend to want to live in the present. Further research is needed to elucidate the best approach to deal with this discrepancy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Advance care planning; Huntington’s disease; Neurodegenerative disease; Patients’ perspectives; Qualitative research
Authors: Ires Ghielen; Sonja Rutten; Rosa E Boeschoten; Marieke Houniet-de Gier; Erwin E H van Wegen; Odile A van den Heuvel; Pim Cuijpers Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Judith A C Rietjens; Rebecca L Sudore; Michael Connolly; Johannes J van Delden; Margaret A Drickamer; Mirjam Droger; Agnes van der Heide; Daren K Heyland; Dirk Houttekier; Daisy J A Janssen; Luciano Orsi; Sheila Payne; Jane Seymour; Ralf J Jox; Ida J Korfage Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Nancy R Downing; Siera Goodnight; Sena Chae; Joel S Perlmutter; Michael McCormack; Elizabeth Hahn; Stacey K Barton; Noelle Carlozzi Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Daniel Zielonka; Johan Marinus; Raymund A C Roos; Giuseppe De Michele; Stefano Di Donato; Hein Putter; Jerzy Marcinkowski; Ferdinando Squitieri; Anna Rita Bentivoglio; G Bernhard Landwehrmeyer Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: V L Wheelock; T Tempkin; K Marder; M Nance; R H Myers; H Zhao; E Kayson; C Orme; I Shoulson Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-03-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marina R Ekkel; Marja F I A Depla; Els M L Verschuur; Ruth B Veenhuizen; Cees M P M Hertogh; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: BMC Med Ethics Date: 2022-10-10 Impact factor: 2.834