Sarah Coutts1, Alix Woldring2, Ann Pederson2,3,4, Julie De Salaberry3, Horacio Osiovich3,4, Lori A Brotto5,6. 1. Perinatal Services BC, 260 - 1770 W 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V6J 4Y6, Canada. scoutts-02@phsa.ca. 2. Perinatal Services BC, 260 - 1770 W 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V6J 4Y6, Canada. 3. BC Women's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada. 4. University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. 5. Women's Health Research Institute, H214 - 4500 Oak Street, Box 42B, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The goal of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is to provide optimal care for preterm and sick infants while supporting their growth and development. The NICU environment can be stressful for preterm infants and often cannot adequately support their neurodevelopmental needs. Kangaroo Care (KC) is an evidence-based developmental care strategy that has been shown to be associated with improved short and long term neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm infants. Despite evidence for best practice, uptake of the practice of KC in resource supported settings remains low. The aim of this study was to identify and describe healthcare providers' perspectives on the barriers and enablers of implementing KC. METHODS: This qualitative study was set in 11 NICUs in British Columbia, Canada, ranging in size from 6 to 70 beds, with mixed levels of care from the less acute up to the most complex acute neonatal care. A total of 35 semi-structured healthcare provider interviews were conducted to understand their experiences providing KC in the NICU. Data were coded and emerging themes were identified. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided our research methods. RESULTS: Four overarching themes were identified as barriers and enablers to KC by healthcare providers in their particular setting: 1) the NICU physical environment; 2) healthcare provider beliefs about KC; 3) clinical practice variation; and 4) parent presence. Depending on the specific features of a given site these factors functioned as an enabler or barrier to practicing KC. CONCLUSIONS: A 'one size fits all' approach cannot be identified to guide Kangaroo Care implementation as it is a complex intervention and each NICU presents unique barriers and enablers to its uptake. Support for improving parental presence, shifting healthcare provider beliefs, identifying creative solutions to NICU design and space constraints, and the development of a provincial guideline for KC in NICUs may together provide the impetus to change practice and reduce barriers to KC for healthcare providers, families, and administrators at local and system levels.
BACKGROUND: The goal of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is to provide optimal care for preterm and sick infants while supporting their growth and development. The NICU environment can be stressful for preterm infants and often cannot adequately support their neurodevelopmental needs. Kangaroo Care (KC) is an evidence-based developmental care strategy that has been shown to be associated with improved short and long term neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm infants. Despite evidence for best practice, uptake of the practice of KC in resource supported settings remains low. The aim of this study was to identify and describe healthcare providers' perspectives on the barriers and enablers of implementing KC. METHODS: This qualitative study was set in 11 NICUs in British Columbia, Canada, ranging in size from 6 to 70 beds, with mixed levels of care from the less acute up to the most complex acute neonatal care. A total of 35 semi-structured healthcare provider interviews were conducted to understand their experiences providing KC in the NICU. Data were coded and emerging themes were identified. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided our research methods. RESULTS: Four overarching themes were identified as barriers and enablers to KC by healthcare providers in their particular setting: 1) the NICU physical environment; 2) healthcare provider beliefs about KC; 3) clinical practice variation; and 4) parent presence. Depending on the specific features of a given site these factors functioned as an enabler or barrier to practicing KC. CONCLUSIONS: A 'one size fits all' approach cannot be identified to guide Kangaroo Care implementation as it is a complex intervention and each NICU presents unique barriers and enablers to its uptake. Support for improving parental presence, shifting healthcare provider beliefs, identifying creative solutions to NICU design and space constraints, and the development of a provincial guideline for KC in NICUs may together provide the impetus to change practice and reduce barriers to KC for healthcare providers, families, and administrators at local and system levels.
Authors: Rita H Pickler; Jacqueline M McGrath; Barbara A Reyna; Nancy McCain; Mary Lewis; Sharon Cone; Paul Wetzel; Al Best Journal: J Perinat Neonatal Nurs Date: 2010 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 1.638
Authors: Judith S Gooding; Liza G Cooper; Arianna I Blaine; Linda S Franck; Jennifer L Howse; Scott D Berns Journal: Semin Perinatol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.300
Authors: Barbara J Stoll; Nellie I Hansen; Edward F Bell; Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; Michele C Walsh; Ellen C Hale; Nancy S Newman; Kurt Schibler; Waldemar A Carlo; Kathleen A Kennedy; Brenda B Poindexter; Neil N Finer; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Shahnaz Duara; Pablo J Sánchez; T Michael O'Shea; Ronald N Goldberg; Krisa P Van Meurs; Roger G Faix; Dale L Phelps; Ivan D Frantz; Kristi L Watterberg; Shampa Saha; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-08-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Nathalie Charpak; Rejean Tessier; Juan G Ruiz; Jose Tiberio Hernandez; Felipe Uriza; Julieta Villegas; Line Nadeau; Catherine Mercier; Francoise Maheu; Jorge Marin; Darwin Cortes; Juan Miguel Gallego; Dario Maldonado Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 7.124