Emily W Harville1, Gloria P Giarratano2, Pierre Buekens3, Eurydice Lang2, Jennifer Wagman4,5. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St. #8318, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. eharvill@tulane.edu. 2. School of Nursing, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St. #8318, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. 4. Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1772, USA. 5. Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, 92093, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Congenital syphilis is completely preventable through screening and treatment, but rates have been rising in the United States. Certain areas are at particularly high risk. We aimed to assess attitudes, knowledge, and barriers around effective prevention of congenital syphilis among health care providers and community women potentially at risk. METHODS: Two parallel studies were conducted: in-depth interviews with health care providers and focus groups with community women in the area of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Each group was questioned about their experience in providing or seeking prenatal care, knowledge and attitudes about congenital syphilis, sources of information on testing and treatment, perceptions of risk, standards of and barriers to treatment. Results were transcribed into QSR NVivo V10, codes developed, and common themes identified and organized. RESULTS: Providers identified delays in testing and care, lack of follow-through with partner testing, and need for community connection for prevention, as major contributors to higher rates of congenital syphilis. Women identified difficulties in accessing Medicaid contributing to delayed start of prenatal care, lack of transportation for prenatal care, and lack of knowledge about testing and prevention for congenital syphilis. CONCLUSIONS: Providers and community members were in broad agreement about factors contributing to higher rates of congenital syphilis, although some aspects were emphasized more by one group or another. Evidence-based interventions, likely at multiple levels, need to be tested and implemented to eliminate congenital syphilis.
BACKGROUND: Congenital syphilis is completely preventable through screening and treatment, but rates have been rising in the United States. Certain areas are at particularly high risk. We aimed to assess attitudes, knowledge, and barriers around effective prevention of congenital syphilis among health care providers and community women potentially at risk. METHODS: Two parallel studies were conducted: in-depth interviews with health care providers and focus groups with community women in the area of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Each group was questioned about their experience in providing or seeking prenatal care, knowledge and attitudes about congenital syphilis, sources of information on testing and treatment, perceptions of risk, standards of and barriers to treatment. Results were transcribed into QSR NVivo V10, codes developed, and common themes identified and organized. RESULTS: Providers identified delays in testing and care, lack of follow-through with partner testing, and need for community connection for prevention, as major contributors to higher rates of congenital syphilis. Women identified difficulties in accessing Medicaid contributing to delayed start of prenatal care, lack of transportation for prenatal care, and lack of knowledge about testing and prevention for congenital syphilis. CONCLUSIONS: Providers and community members were in broad agreement about factors contributing to higher rates of congenital syphilis, although some aspects were emphasized more by one group or another. Evidence-based interventions, likely at multiple levels, need to be tested and implemented to eliminate congenital syphilis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Prenatal care; Qualitative methods; Social determinants of health; Syphilis, congenital
Authors: Melissa D Klein; Robert S Kahn; Raymond C Baker; Elaine E Fink; Donita S Parrish; Deanna C White Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Raquel Rodrigues Dos Santos; Roberta Pereira Niquini; Francisco Inácio Bastos; Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues Journal: Int J Health Serv Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 1.663
Authors: Heather Bradley; DeAnn Gruber; Camille E Introcaso; Joseph Foxhood; Debbie Wendell; Mohammad Rahman; Joy Ewell; Robert D Kirkcaldy; Hillard S Weinstock Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Nicky J Mehtani; Christina M Schumacher; Luke E Johnsen; Adena Greenbaum; C Patrick Chaulk; Khalil G Ghanem; Jacky M Jennings; Kathleen R Page Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jennifer A Wagman; Eunhee Park; Gloria P Giarratano; Pierre M Buekens; Emily W Harville Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Rosalyn E Plotzker; Nicole O Burghardt; Ryan D Murphy; Rachel McLean; Kathleen Jacobson; Eric C Tang; Dominika Seidman Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2022-03-27
Authors: Kelly A Johnson; Robert E Snyder; Eric C Tang; Natalie S de Guzman; Rosalyn E Plotzker; Ryan Murphy; Kathleen Jacobson Journal: Pathogens Date: 2022-05-06