Isabel Geiger1, Christian Kammerlander2, Christine Höfer3, Ruth Volland3, Jörg Trinemeier4, Martina Henschelchen5, Thomas Friess5, Wolfgang Böcker5, Leonie Sundmacher6. 1. Department of Health Services Management at LMU (LMU-HSM), Munich, Germany. geiger@bwl.lmu.de. 2. Department of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany. 3. AUC - Academy for Trauma Surgery GmbH, Munich, Cologne, Germany. 4. PVM Versorgungsmanagement GmbH, Speyer, Germany. 5. Department of Health Services Management at LMU (LMU-HSM), Munich, Germany. 6. Chair of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The economic and public health burden of fragility fractures of the hip in Germany is high. The likelihood of requiring long-term care and the risk of suffering from a secondary fracture increases substantially after sustaining an initial fracture. Neither appropriate confirmatory diagnostics of the suspected underlying osteoporosis nor therapy, which are well-recognised approaches to reduce the burden of fragility fractures, are routinely initiated in the German healthcare system. Therefore, the aim of the study FLS-CARE is to evaluate whether a coordinated care programme can close the prevention gap for patients suffering from a fragility hip fracture through the implementation of systematic diagnostics, a falls prevention programme and guideline-adherent interventions based on the Fracture Liaison Services model. METHODS: The study is set up as a non-blinded, cluster-randomised, controlled trial with unequal cluster sizes. Allocation to intervention group (FLS-CARE) and control group (usual care) follows an allocation ratio of 1:1 using trauma centres as the unit of allocation. Sample size calculations resulted in a total of 1216 patients (608 patients per group distributed over 9 clusters) needed for the analysis. After informed consent, all participants are assessed directly at discharge, after 3 months, 12 months and 24 months. The primary outcome measure of the study is the secondary fracture rate 24 months after initial hip fracture. Secondary outcomes include differences in the number of falls, mortality, quality-adjusted life years, activities of daily living and mobility. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness/utility of FLS implementation in Germany. Findings of the process evaluation will also shed light on potential barriers to the implementation of FLS in the context of the German healthcare system. Challenges for the study include the successful integration of the outpatient sector as well as the future course of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 and its influence on the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) 00022237 , prospectively registered 2020-07-09.
BACKGROUND: The economic and public health burden of fragility fractures of the hip in Germany is high. The likelihood of requiring long-term care and the risk of suffering from a secondary fracture increases substantially after sustaining an initial fracture. Neither appropriate confirmatory diagnostics of the suspected underlying osteoporosis nor therapy, which are well-recognised approaches to reduce the burden of fragility fractures, are routinely initiated in the German healthcare system. Therefore, the aim of the study FLS-CARE is to evaluate whether a coordinated care programme can close the prevention gap for patients suffering from a fragility hip fracture through the implementation of systematic diagnostics, a falls prevention programme and guideline-adherent interventions based on the Fracture Liaison Services model. METHODS: The study is set up as a non-blinded, cluster-randomised, controlled trial with unequal cluster sizes. Allocation to intervention group (FLS-CARE) and control group (usual care) follows an allocation ratio of 1:1 using trauma centres as the unit of allocation. Sample size calculations resulted in a total of 1216 patients (608 patients per group distributed over 9 clusters) needed for the analysis. After informed consent, all participants are assessed directly at discharge, after 3 months, 12 months and 24 months. The primary outcome measure of the study is the secondary fracture rate 24 months after initial hip fracture. Secondary outcomes include differences in the number of falls, mortality, quality-adjusted life years, activities of daily living and mobility. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness/utility of FLS implementation in Germany. Findings of the process evaluation will also shed light on potential barriers to the implementation of FLS in the context of the German healthcare system. Challenges for the study include the successful integration of the outpatient sector as well as the future course of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 and its influence on the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) 00022237 , prospectively registered 2020-07-09.
Authors: A Naranjo; S Ojeda-Bruno; A Bilbao-Cantarero; J C Quevedo-Abeledo; B V Diaz-González; C Rodríguez-Lozano Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: H Johansson; K Siggeirsdóttir; N C Harvey; A Odén; V Gudnason; E McCloskey; G Sigurdsson; J A Kanis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: D Schray; C Neuerburg; J Stein; M Gosch; M Schieker; W Böcker; C Kammerlander Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Karla Hemming; Alan J Girling; Alice J Sitch; Jennifer Marsh; Richard J Lilford Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: P Hadji; I Kyvernitakis; P H Kann; C Niedhart; L C Hofbauer; H Schwarz; A A Kurth; F Thomasius; M Schulte; M Intorcia; E Psachoulia; T Schmid Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Antonio Naranjo; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Julián Sánchez-Martín; Alejandro Pérez-Mitru; Max Brosa Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2022-04-22