Chen-Chie Wang1,2, Ing-Ho Chen1,2,3, Ya-Ting Yang1, Yi-Ru Chen1,4, Kai-Chiang Yang1,4. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City. 2. Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien. 4. School of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) are a promising source of cells for articular cartilage regeneration. However, ASCs isolated from different adipose tissue depots have heterogeneous cell characterizations and differentiation potential when cultured in 3-dimensional (3D) niches. DESIGN: We compared the chondrogenicity of ASCs isolated from infrapatellar fat pads (IPFPs) and subcutaneous fat pads (SCFPs) in 3D gelatin-based biomimetic matrix. RESULTS: The IPFP-ASC-differentiated chondrocytes had higher ACAN, COL2A1, COL10, SOX6, SOX9, ChM-1, and MIA-3 mRNA levels and lower COL1A1 and VEGF levels than the SCFP-ASCs in 3D matrix. The difference in mRNA profile may have contributed to activation of the Akt, p38, RhoA, and JNK signaling pathways in the IPFP-ASCs. The chondrocytes differentiated from IPFP-ASCs had pronounced glycosaminoglycan and collagen type II production and a high chondroitin-6-sulfate/chondroitin-4-sulfate ratio with less polymerization of β-actin filaments. In an ex vivo mice model, magnetic resonance imaging revealed a shorter T2 relaxation time, indicating that more abundant extracellular matrix was secreted in the IPFP-ASC-matrix group. Histological examinations revealed that the IPFP-ASC matrix had higher chondrogenic efficacy of new cartilaginous tissue generation as evident in collagen type II and S-100 staining. Conclusion. ASCs isolated from IPFPs may be better candidates for cartilage regeneration, highlighting the translational potential of cartilage tissue engineering using the IPFP-ASC matrix technique.
OBJECTIVE: Adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASCs) are a promising source of cells for articular cartilage regeneration. However, ASCs isolated from different adipose tissue depots have heterogeneous cell characterizations and differentiation potential when cultured in 3-dimensional (3D) niches. DESIGN: We compared the chondrogenicity of ASCs isolated from infrapatellar fat pads (IPFPs) and subcutaneous fat pads (SCFPs) in 3D gelatin-based biomimetic matrix. RESULTS: The IPFP-ASC-differentiated chondrocytes had higher ACAN, COL2A1, COL10, SOX6, SOX9, ChM-1, and MIA-3 mRNA levels and lower COL1A1 and VEGF levels than the SCFP-ASCs in 3D matrix. The difference in mRNA profile may have contributed to activation of the Akt, p38, RhoA, and JNK signaling pathways in the IPFP-ASCs. The chondrocytes differentiated from IPFP-ASCs had pronounced glycosaminoglycan and collagen type II production and a high chondroitin-6-sulfate/chondroitin-4-sulfate ratio with less polymerization of β-actin filaments. In an ex vivo mice model, magnetic resonance imaging revealed a shorter T2 relaxation time, indicating that more abundant extracellular matrix was secreted in the IPFP-ASC-matrix group. Histological examinations revealed that the IPFP-ASC matrix had higher chondrogenic efficacy of new cartilaginous tissue generation as evident in collagen type II and S-100 staining. Conclusion. ASCs isolated from IPFPs may be better candidates for cartilage regeneration, highlighting the translational potential of cartilage tissue engineering using the IPFP-ASC matrix technique.
Authors: Brian M Strem; Kevin C Hicok; Min Zhu; Isabella Wulur; Zeni Alfonso; Ronda E Schreiber; John K Fraser; Marc H Hedrick Journal: Keio J Med Date: 2005-09
Authors: Pedro Pires de Carvalho; Katie M Hamel; Robert Duarte; Andrew G S King; Masudul Haque; Marilyn A Dietrich; Xiying Wu; Forum Shah; David Burk; Rui L Reis; Jennifer Rood; Ping Zhang; Mandi Lopez; Jeffrey M Gimble; Vinod Dasa Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 3.963
Authors: Mark S Hickery; Michael T Bayliss; Jayesh Dudhia; Joanne C Lewthwaite; Jo C W Edwards; Andrew A Pitsillides Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-09-17 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Wouter J F M Jurgens; Maikel J Oedayrajsingh-Varma; Marco N Helder; Behrouz Zandiehdoulabi; Tabitha E Schouten; Dirk J Kuik; Marco J P F Ritt; Florine J van Milligen Journal: Cell Tissue Res Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Kai-Chiang Yang; Ing-Ho Chen; Ya-Ting Yang; Jong-Kai Hsiao; Chen-Chie Wang Journal: Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 7.328
Authors: Christopher Sd Lee; Olivia A Burnsed; Vineeth Raghuram; Jonathan Kalisvaart; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 6.832