Literature DB >> 33435584

Real World Analysis of Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Prognostic Factors and Treatment Outcomes.

Sarah Sharman Moser1, Jair Bar2,3, Inna Kan4, Keren Ofek4, Raanan Cohen4, Nikhil Khandelwal5, Varda Shalev1,3, Gabriel Chodick1,3, Nava Siegelmann-Danieli1.   

Abstract

In this observational study, we assessed treatment patterns and prognostic factors in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a large state-mandated healthcare organization in Israel.
Methods: All incident cases with histologically confirmed SCLC who initiated systemic anti-cancer treatment between 2011 and 2017 were identified. Treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) were evaluated for each line of therapy.
Results: A total of 235 patients were identified (61% male, median age 64 years, 95% ever smokers, 64% had extensive stage). The first-line treatment was platinum-etoposide regimen for 98.7% of the cohort. The second and third-line regimen were given to 43% and 12% of patients, respectively. Mean OS for extensive and limited stage patients was 9.1 and 23.5 months respectively. In a multivariable model, increased risk for mortality was observed among patients with an ECOG performance status (PS) of 2 compared to a PS of 0-1 for the extensive stage patients (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.63, 95% confidence ratios (CI): 1.00-2.65); and for males compared to females for the limited stage patients (HR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.12-4.20). Regarding all 2nd line patients in a multivariable model incorporating relevant confounding factors, demonstrated a significantly better outcome with platinum-based regimens compared to topotecan. Median survival after initiation of 2nd line in platinum-sensitive patients was longer (p = 0.056) for those re-challenged with platinum-based regimen (n = 7): 6.8mo (6.1-not reported (NR)), compared with those switched to a different treatment (n = 27): 4.5 mo (2.6-6.6) for extensive stage patients, and a non-significant difference was also observed for limited stage patients.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is one of the largest real-world studies of SCLC patients. OS for SCLC patients was similar to that reported in clinical trials. PS for extensive stage patients and sex for limited stage patients were significant correlates of prognosis. Re-challenge of the platinum-based doublet was associated with longer OS compared to switching treatment in extensive stage patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SCLC; limited stage; observational study; platinum sensitive; survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 33435584      PMCID: PMC7903279          DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  54 in total

1.  Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Overview Collaborative Group.

Authors:  A Aupérin; R Arriagada; J P Pignon; C Le Péchoux; A Gregor; R J Stephens; P E Kristjansen; B E Johnson; H Ueoka; H Wagner; J Aisner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Second-line chemotherapy and its evaluation in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C Huisman; P E Postmus; G Giaccone; E F Smit
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 3.  Small cell lung cancer: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Lauren Averett Byers; Charles M Rudin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Predictors of 5-year survival and curability in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J P Crown; A P Chahinian; I S Jaffrey; O J Glidewell; M Kaneko; J F Holland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Third-line chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: an international analysis.

Authors:  Demetrios Simos; Golmehr Sajjady; Melissa Sergi; Mun Sem Liew; Raffaele Califano; Cheryl Ho; Natasha Leighl; Shane White; Yvonne Summers; William Petrcich; Paul Wheatley-Price
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.785

6.  Oral second- and third-line lomustine-etoposide-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Lebeau; Christos Chouaïd; Mariette Baud; Marie-Josée Masanès; Michel Febvre
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 7.  New advances in the second-line treatment of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jane L Hurwitz; Francis McCoy; Paula Scullin; Dean A Fennell
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2009-10-09

Review 8.  Progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Miklos Simon; Athanassios Argiris; John R Murren
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Gender and histologic type variations in smoking-related risk of lung cancer.

Authors:  R C Brownson; J C Chang; J R Davis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Third-Line Nivolumab Monotherapy in Recurrent SCLC: CheckMate 032.

Authors:  Neal Ready; Anna F Farago; Filippo de Braud; Akin Atmaca; Matthew D Hellmann; Jeffrey G Schneider; David R Spigel; Victor Moreno; Ian Chau; Christine L Hann; Joseph Paul Eder; Nicola L Steele; Anne Pieters; Justin Fairchild; Scott J Antonia
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 15.609

View more
  1 in total

1.  Validation of Pretreatment Prognostic Factors and Prognostic Staging Systems for Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Real-World Data Set.

Authors:  Raphael Hagmann; Alfred Zippelius; Sacha I Rothschild
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.