Manuel García-Goñi1, Alexandrina P Stoyanova2, Roberto Nuño-Solinís3. 1. Department of Applied & Structural Economics and History, Faculty of Economics and Business, Complutense University of Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid), Spain. 2. Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Barcelona, 08034 Barcelona, Spain. 3. Health Unit, Deusto Business School, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mental illness, multi-morbidity, and socio-economic inequalities are some of the main challenges for the public health system nowadays, and are further aggravated by the process of population aging. Therefore, it is widely accepted that health systems need to focus their strategies for confronting such concerns. With guaranteed access to health care services under universal coverage in many health systems, it is expected that all services be provided equally to patients with the same level of need. METHODS: In this paper, we explore the existence of inequalities in the access to services of patients with mental illness taking into account whether they are multimorbid patients, their socioeconomic status, and their age. We take advantage of a one-year (2010-2011) database on individual healthcare utilization and expenditures for the total population (N = 2,262,698) of the Basque Country. RESULTS: More comorbidity leads to greater inequality in prevalence, being the poor sicker, although with age, this inequality decreases. All health services are more oriented towards greater utilization of the poor and sicker, particularly in the case of visits to specialists and emergency care. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health inequalities in prevalence have been identified as being disproportionally concentrated in the least affluent areas of the Basque Country. However, inequalities in the utilization of publicly-provided health services present a pro-poor orientation. As this region has adopted a system-wide transformation towards integrated care, its mental health delivery model offers excellent potential for international comparisons and benchlearning.
BACKGROUND:Mental illness, multi-morbidity, and socio-economic inequalities are some of the main challenges for the public health system nowadays, and are further aggravated by the process of population aging. Therefore, it is widely accepted that health systems need to focus their strategies for confronting such concerns. With guaranteed access to health care services under universal coverage in many health systems, it is expected that all services be provided equally to patients with the same level of need. METHODS: In this paper, we explore the existence of inequalities in the access to services of patients with mental illness taking into account whether they are multimorbid patients, their socioeconomic status, and their age. We take advantage of a one-year (2010-2011) database on individual healthcare utilization and expenditures for the total population (N = 2,262,698) of the Basque Country. RESULTS: More comorbidity leads to greater inequality in prevalence, being the poor sicker, although with age, this inequality decreases. All health services are more oriented towards greater utilization of the poor and sicker, particularly in the case of visits to specialists and emergency care. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health inequalities in prevalence have been identified as being disproportionally concentrated in the least affluent areas of the Basque Country. However, inequalities in the utilization of publicly-provided health services present a pro-poor orientation. As this region has adopted a system-wide transformation towards integrated care, its mental health delivery model offers excellent potential for international comparisons and benchlearning.
Entities:
Keywords:
access to care; inequality; mental illness; multimorbidity; socioeconomic status
Authors: Maria João Forjaz; Carmen Rodriguez-Blazquez; Alba Ayala; Vicente Rodriguez-Rodriguez; Jesús de Pedro-Cuesta; Susana Garcia-Gutierrez; Alexandra Prados-Torres Journal: Eur J Intern Med Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 4.487
Authors: Walter A Rocca; Cynthia M Boyd; Brandon R Grossardt; William V Bobo; Lila J Finney Rutten; Véronique L Roger; Jon O Ebbert; Terry M Therneau; Barbara P Yawn; Jennifer L St Sauver Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Juan F Orueta; Arturo García-Álvarez; Edurne Alonso-Morán; Laura Vallejo-Torres; Roberto Nuño-Solinis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-09-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Enrique Regidor; David Martínez; María E Calle; Paloma Astasio; Paloma Ortega; Vicente Domínguez Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-09-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Elizabeth Ingram; Sarah Ledden; Sarah Beardon; Manuel Gomes; Sue Hogarth; Helen McDonald; David P Osborn; Jessica Sheringham Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Jeffrey V Lazarus; Kelly Safreed-Harmon; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Jane Anderson; Ricardo Baptista Leite; Georg Behrens; Linda-Gail Bekker; Sanjay Bhagani; Darren Brown; Graham Brown; Susan Buchbinder; Carlos Caceres; Pedro E Cahn; Patrizia Carrieri; Georgina Caswell; Graham S Cooke; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Nikos Dedes; Julia Del Amo; Richard Elliott; Wafaa M El-Sadr; María José Fuster-Ruiz de Apodaca; Giovanni Guaraldi; Tim Hallett; Richard Harding; Margaret Hellard; Shabbar Jaffar; Meaghan Kall; Marina Klein; Sharon R Lewin; Ken Mayer; Jose A Pérez-Molina; Doreen Moraa; Denise Naniche; Denis Nash; Teymur Noori; Anton Pozniak; Reena Rajasuriar; Peter Reiss; Nesrine Rizk; Jürgen Rockstroh; Diana Romero; Caroline Sabin; David Serwadda; Laura Waters Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 14.919