Literature DB >> 33435285

Strengths and Challenges of Secretory Ribonucleases as AntiTumor Agents.

Jessica Castro1,2, Marc Ribó1,2, Maria Vilanova1,2, Antoni Benito1,2.   

Abstract

Approaches to develop effective drugs to kill cancer cells are mainly focused either on the improvement of the currently used chemotherapeutics or on the development of targeted therapies aimed at the selective destruction of cancer cells by steering specific molecules and/or enhancing the immune response. The former strategy is limited by its genotoxicity and severe side effects, while the second one is not always effective due to tumor cell heterogeneity and variability of targets in cancer cells. Between these two strategies, several approaches target different types of RNA in tumor cells. RNA degradation alters gene expression at different levels inducing cell death. However, unlike DNA targeting, it is a pleotropic but a non-genotoxic process. Among the ways to destroy RNA, we find the use of ribonucleases with antitumor properties. In the last few years, there has been a significant progress in the understanding of the mechanism by which these enzymes kill cancer cells and in the development of more effective variants. All the approaches seek to maintain the requirements of the ribonucleases to be specifically cytotoxic for tumor cells. These requirements start with the competence of the enzymes to interact with the cell membrane, a process that is critical for their internalization and selectivity for tumor cells and continue with the downstream effects mainly relying on changes in the RNA molecular profile, which are not only due to the ribonucleolytic activity of these enzymes. Although the great improvements achieved in the antitumor activity by designing new ribonuclease variants, some drawbacks still need to be addressed. In the present review, we will focus on the known mechanisms used by ribonucleases to kill cancer cells and on recent strategies to solve the shortcomings that they show as antitumor agents, mainly their pharmacokinetics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA-targeted drugs 4; antitumor agents 1; pharmacokinetic 3; ribonucleases 2

Year:  2021        PMID: 33435285      PMCID: PMC7828032          DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13010082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmaceutics        ISSN: 1999-4923            Impact factor:   6.321


  135 in total

1.  Characterization of Rny1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae member of the T2 RNase family of RNases: unexpected functions for ancient enzymes?

Authors:  G C MacIntosh; P A Bariola; E Newbigin; P J Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Polymers for cytosolic protein delivery.

Authors:  Jia Lv; Qianqian Fan; Hui Wang; Yiyun Cheng
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Site-directed mutagenesis of histidine-13 and histidine-114 of human angiogenin. Alanine derivatives inhibit angiogenin-induced angiogenesis.

Authors:  R Shapiro; B L Vallee
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-09-05       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  Functional roles of the human ribonuclease A superfamily in RNA metabolism and membrane receptor biology.

Authors:  Heng-Huan Lee; Ying-Nai Wang; Mien-Chie Hung
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2019-03-25

Review 5.  The angiogenins.

Authors:  D J Strydom
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Key extracellular and intracellular steps in the antitumor action of seminal ribonuclease.

Authors:  M R Mastronicola; R Piccoli; G D'Alessio
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1995-05-15

7.  Angiogenin/Ribonuclease 5 Is an EGFR Ligand and a Serum Biomarker for Erlotinib Sensitivity in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Ying-Nai Wang; Heng-Huan Lee; Chao-Kai Chou; Wen-Hao Yang; Yongkun Wei; Chun-Te Chen; Jun Yao; Jennifer L Hsu; Cihui Zhu; Haoqiang Ying; Yuanqing Ye; Wei-Jan Wang; Seung-Oe Lim; Weiya Xia; How-Wen Ko; Xiuping Liu; Chang-Gong Liu; Xifeng Wu; Huamin Wang; Donghui Li; Laura R Prakash; Matthew H Katz; Yaan Kang; Michael Kim; Jason B Fleming; David Fogelman; Milind Javle; Anirban Maitra; Mien-Chie Hung
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Actin is a binding protein for angiogenin.

Authors:  G F Hu; D J Strydom; J W Fett; J F Riordan; B L Vallee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Plant RNases T2, but not Dicer-like proteins, are major players of tRNA-derived fragments biogenesis.

Authors:  Cyrille Megel; Guillaume Hummel; Stéphanie Lalande; Elodie Ubrig; Valérie Cognat; Geoffrey Morelle; Thalia Salinas-Giegé; Anne-Marie Duchêne; Laurence Maréchal-Drouard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  RNase activity of sialic acid-binding lectin from bullfrog eggs drives antitumor effect via the activation of p38 MAPK to caspase-3/7 signaling pathway in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Yukiko Kariya; Takeo Tatsuta; Shigeki Sugawara; Yoshinobu Kariya; Kazuo Nitta; Masahiro Hosono
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.650

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Emerging biological functions of ribonuclease 1 and angiogenin.

Authors:  Emily R Garnett; Ronald T Raines
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 8.697

2.  Structural and Functional Differences between Homologous Bacterial Ribonucleases.

Authors:  Vera Ulyanova; Alsu Nadyrova; Elena Dudkina; Aleksandra Kuznetsova; Albina Ahmetgalieva; Dzhigangir Faizullin; Yulia Surchenko; Darya Novopashina; Yuriy Zuev; Nikita Kuznetsov; Olga Ilinskaya
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Anticancer Activity of Reconstituted Ribonuclease S-Decorated Artificial Viral Capsid.

Authors:  Yingbing Liang; Hiroto Furukawa; Kentarou Sakamoto; Hiroshi Inaba; Kazunori Matsuura
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.461

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.