Literature DB >> 33433752

A retrospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in Japan during the early years following its introduction: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG1081S).

Eiji Kobayashi1, Hiroyuki Kanao2, Munetaka Takekuma3, Shin Nishio4, Atsumi Kojima-Chiba5, Akiko Tozawa6, Satoshi Yamaguchi7, Nobuhiro Takeshima2, Eiji Nakatani8, Mikio Mikami9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for cervical cancer, in terms of morbidity and short-term oncologic outcome following LRH's introduction into Japan.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO staging IA2, IB1, and IIA1) who underwent LRH from Dec 2014 to Dec 2016. We assessed the morbidity, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), and prognostic factors for RFS.
RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were included from 22 facilities across Japan. There were 8 cases of stage IA2 cervical cancer, 226 of IB1, and 17 of IIA1. The median operating time was 343 min and the median blood loss was 190 ml. Two patients (0.8%) had a postoperative complication with a Clavien-Dindo classification of grade 3 or higher. After a median follow-up time of 15.6 months, the 2-year RFS was 87.4%, and the 2-year OS was 97.8%. When the 2-year RFS rate was compared with whether the patient pathologically had tumors of less than 2 cm, versus 2 cm or more, the RFS was 95.8% and 80.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis found that tumor size and the route of lymph node removal were independent prognostic factors for recurrence.
CONCLUSION: When LRH was first introduced into Japan, we found that the route of lymph node removal was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence in addition to large tumors (≥ 2 cm). Our results suggest that prognosis may be secured by paying attention to the lymph node removal route.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Laparoscopic; Minimally invasive surgery; Predictive factor; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33433752     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01799-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  1 in total

1.  Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a change in practice for the management of early stage cervical cancer in a U.K. cancer center.

Authors:  G Angelopoulos; A Etman; D J Cruickshank; J P Twigg
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.196

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of ESGO Quality Indicators in Cervical Cancer Surgery: A Real-World Study in a High-Volume Chinese Hospital.

Authors:  Yan Ding; Xuyin Zhang; Junjun Qiu; Jianfeng Zhang; Keqin Hua
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Comparison of Prognosis between Minimally Invasive and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Tomohito Tanaka; Shoko Ueda; Shunsuke Miyamoto; Sousuke Hashida; Shinichi Terada; Hiromi Konishi; Yuhei Kogata; Kohei Taniguchi; Kazumasa Komura; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Risk Factors Associated with Perineal and Vaginal Lacerations and Vaginal Removal in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kenro Chikazawa; Ken Imai; Hiroyoshi Ko; Naoki Ichi; Masahiro Misawa; Tomoyuki Kuwata
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-08-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.