Yasutaka Yamada1, Himisha Beltran2. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Sm 758, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Sm 758, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. himisha_beltran@dfci.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is an aggressive histologic subtype of prostate cancer that most commonly arises in later stages of prostate cancer as a mechanism of treatment resistance. The poor prognosis of NEPC is attributed in part to late diagnosis and a lack of effective therapeutic agents. Here, we review the clinical and molecular features of NEPC based on recent studies and outline future strategies and directions. RECENT FINDINGS: NEPC can arise "de novo" but most commonly develops as a result of lineage plasticity whereby prostate cancer cells adopt alternative lineage programs as a means to bypass therapy. Dependence on androgen receptor (AR) signaling is lost as tumors progress from a prostate adenocarcinoma to a NEPC histology, typically manifested by the downregulation of AR, PSA, and PSMA expression in tumors. Genomic analyses from patient biopsies combined with preclinical modeling have pointed to loss of tumor suppressors RB1 and TP53 as key facilitators of lineage plasticity. Activation of oncogenic drivers combined with significant epigenetic changes (e.g., EZH2 overexpression, DNA methylation) further drives tumor proliferation and expression of downstream neuronal and neuroendocrine lineage pathways controlled in part by pioneer and lineage determinant transcription factors (e.g., SOX2, ASCL1, BRN2). These biologic insights have provided a framework for the study of this subgroup of advanced prostate cancers and have started to provide rationale for the development of biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies. Further study of the dynamic process that leads to NEPC is required for the development of effective strategies to identify and treat patients developing lineage plasticity as a mechanism of treatment resistance.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is an aggressive histologic subtype of prostate cancer that most commonly arises in later stages of prostate cancer as a mechanism of treatment resistance. The poor prognosis of NEPC is attributed in part to late diagnosis and a lack of effective therapeutic agents. Here, we review the clinical and molecular features of NEPC based on recent studies and outline future strategies and directions. RECENT FINDINGS: NEPC can arise "de novo" but most commonly develops as a result of lineage plasticity whereby prostate cancer cells adopt alternative lineage programs as a means to bypass therapy. Dependence on androgen receptor (AR) signaling is lost as tumors progress from a prostate adenocarcinoma to a NEPC histology, typically manifested by the downregulation of AR, PSA, and PSMA expression in tumors. Genomic analyses from patient biopsies combined with preclinical modeling have pointed to loss of tumor suppressors RB1 and TP53 as key facilitators of lineage plasticity. Activation of oncogenic drivers combined with significant epigenetic changes (e.g., EZH2 overexpression, DNA methylation) further drives tumor proliferation and expression of downstream neuronal and neuroendocrine lineage pathways controlled in part by pioneer and lineage determinant transcription factors (e.g., SOX2, ASCL1, BRN2). These biologic insights have provided a framework for the study of this subgroup of advanced prostate cancers and have started to provide rationale for the development of biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies. Further study of the dynamic process that leads to NEPC is required for the development of effective strategies to identify and treat patients developing lineage plasticity as a mechanism of treatment resistance.
Entities:
Keywords:
AR indifference; Castration resistance; Epigenetics; Lineage plasticity; Neuroendocrine prostate cancer
Authors: Martin K Bakht; Iulian Derecichei; Yinan Li; Rosa-Maria Ferraiuolo; Mark Dunning; So Won Oh; Abdulkadir Hussein; Hyewon Youn; Keith F Stringer; Chang Wook Jeong; Gi Jeong Cheon; Cheol Kwak; Keon Wook Kang; Alastair D Lamb; Yuzhuo Wang; Xuesen Dong; Lisa A Porter Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Hiroshi Katayama; Jin Wang; Warapen Treekitkarnmongkol; Hidehiko Kawai; Kaori Sasai; Hui Zhang; Hua Wang; Henry P Adams; Shoulei Jiang; Sandip N Chakraborty; Fumio Suzuki; Ralph B Arlinghaus; Jinsong Liu; James A Mobley; William E Grizzle; Huamin Wang; Subrata Sen Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Min Zou; Roxanne Toivanen; Antonina Mitrofanova; Nicolas Floch; Sheida Hayati; Yanping Sun; Clémentine Le Magnen; Daniel Chester; Elahe A Mostaghel; Andrea Califano; Mark A Rubin; Michael M Shen; Cory Abate-Shen Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Michael S Hofman; John Violet; Rodney J Hicks; Justin Ferdinandus; Sue Ping Thang; Tim Akhurst; Amir Iravani; Grace Kong; Aravind Ravi Kumar; Declan G Murphy; Peter Eu; Price Jackson; Mark Scalzo; Scott G Williams; Shahneen Sandhu Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Scott J Antonia; José A López-Martin; Johanna Bendell; Patrick A Ott; Matthew Taylor; Joseph Paul Eder; Dirk Jäger; M Catherine Pietanza; Dung T Le; Filippo de Braud; Michael A Morse; Paolo A Ascierto; Leora Horn; Asim Amin; Rathi N Pillai; Jeffry Evans; Ian Chau; Petri Bono; Akin Atmaca; Padmanee Sharma; Christopher T Harbison; Chen-Sheng Lin; Olaf Christensen; Emiliano Calvo Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-06-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Ana M Aparicio; Li Shen; Elsa Li Ning Tapia; Jing-Fang Lu; Hsiang-Chun Chen; Jiexin Zhang; Guanglin Wu; Xuemei Wang; Patricia Troncoso; Paul Corn; Timothy C Thompson; Bradley Broom; Keith Baggerly; Sankar N Maity; Christopher J Logothetis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jonathan I Epstein; Mahul B Amin; Himisha Beltran; Tamara L Lotan; Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Victor E Reuter; Brian D Robinson; Patricia Troncoso; Mark A Rubin Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Dwight H Owen; Michael J Giffin; Julie M Bailis; Marie-Anne Damiette Smit; David P Carbone; Kai He Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 17.388
Authors: Martin K Bakht; John J Hayward; Farsheed Shahbazi-Raz; Magdalena Skubal; Ryo Tamura; Keith F Stringer; Daniel Meister; Varadha Balaji Venkadakrishnan; Hui Xue; Adam Pillon; Mathew Stover; Adam Tronchin; Bre-Anne Fifield; Lavleen Mader; Sheng-Yu Ku; Gi Jeong Cheon; Keon Wook Kang; Yuzhuo Wang; Xuesen Dong; Himisha Beltran; Jan Grimm; Lisa A Porter; John F Trant Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 12.779