Literature DB >> 33433675

Early surgery after bridge-to-surgery stenting for malignant bowel obstruction is associated with better oncological outcomes.

Tammy Lim1, Hui Yu Tham1, Clyve Yu Leon Yaow2, Ian Jse-Wei Tan1,2, Dedrick Kok Hong Chan1,2, Ridzuan Farouk1,2, Kuok Chung Lee1,2, Bettina Lieske1,2, Ker-Kan Tan1,2, Choon Seng Chong3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Placement of self-expanding metal stents has been increasingly adopted as a bridge to surgery in patients presenting with obstructed left-sided colorectal cancers. The optimal bridging time has yet to be widely established, hence this retrospective study aims to determine the optimal bridging time to elective surgery post endoluminal stenting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent colorectal stenting for large bowel obstruction in a single, tertiary hospital in Singapore between January 2003 and December 2017 were retrospectively identified. Patients' baseline demographics, tumour characteristics, stent-related complications, intra-operative details, post-operative complications and oncological outcomes were analysed.
RESULTS: Of the 53 patients who successfully underwent colonic stenting for malignant left sided obstruction, 33.96% of patients underwent surgery within two weeks of stent placement while 66.04% of patients underwent surgery after 2 weeks of stent placement. Univariate analysis between both groups did not demonstrate significant differences in postoperative complications and stoma formation. Significant differences were observed between both groups for stent complications (38.89% vs 8.57%, p = 0.022), on-table decompression (38.89% vs 2.86%, p = 0.001) and systemic recurrence (11.11% vs 40.00%, p = 0.030). Increased bridging interval to surgery (OR 13.16, CI 1.37-126.96, p = 0.026) was a significant risk factor for systemic recurrence on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing definitive surgery within 2 weeks of colonic stenting may have better oncological outcomes without compromising on postoperative outcomes. Further prospective studies are required to compare outcomes between emergency surgery and different bridging intervals.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bridge-to-surgery; Colonic neoplasms; Intestinal obstruction; Self expandable metallic stents; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33433675     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08232-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  2 in total

1.  [2 solutions for estimating odds ratios with zeros].

Authors:  C Valenzuela
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 0.553

2.  Impact of endoscopic stent insertion on detection of viable circulating tumor cells from obstructive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shinya Yamashita; Masahiro Tanemura; Genta Sawada; Jeongho Moon; Yosuke Shimizu; Toshiki Yamaguchi; Toshio Kuwai; Yasuo Urata; Kazuya Kuraoka; Nobutaka Hatanaka; Yoshinori Yamashita; Kiyomi Taniyama
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.967

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Differences in clinical outcomes according to the time interval between the bridge to surgery stenting and surgery for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction.

Authors:  Hyung-Hoon Oh; Ji-Yun Hong; Dong-Hyun Kim; Dae-Seong Myung; Sung-Bum Cho; Wan-Sik Lee; Hyun-Soo Kim; Young-Eun Joo
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.253

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.