| Literature DB >> 33433531 |
Zhi-Gang Wu1,2, Wei-Kang Chen2, Qian-Jin Fei3, Yan-Long Liu4, Xiao-Dong Liu5, Hong Huang4, Xue-Jun Shang1.
Abstract
This study analyzed the trend in semen quality of infertile male patients in Wenzhou, China, based on the data obtained from 38 905 patients during 2008-2016 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou, China). The results showed that only 24.9% of the patients had normal semen quality. For the semen quality of infertile male patients, that of the workers and 40-year-olds was significantly worse than the other occupational and age groups. For all the infertile patients, low semen volume, asthenozoospermia, and teratozoospermia accounted for 8.4%, 50.5%, and 54.1%, respectively. During 2008-2016, the annual mean percentage of fast forward motile spermatozoa, percentage of total forward motile spermatozoa, and percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology decreased linearly with slopes of -2.11, -2.59, and -0.70, respectively. The proportion of patients with asthenozoospermia and multi-abnormal spermatozoa increased during 2008-2016 with slopes of 4.70 and 4.87, respectively, while for low semen volume, it decreased with a slope of -0.47 in the same time period. The proportion of patients with teratozoospermia increased from 2008 to 2011 and from 2011 to 2016 with slopes of 17.10 and 2.09, respectively. In general, the deteriorating trend of semen quality of infertile male patients in Wenzhou was obvious. Future efforts should be made to reveal the adverse influences on semen quality, such as occupational exposure, environmental quality, and living habits. Furthermore, more pervasive reproduction health education is necessary.Entities:
Keywords: distribution; infertile male patient; semen quality; symptoms; time trend
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33433531 PMCID: PMC8152416 DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_83_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Androl ISSN: 1008-682X Impact factor: 3.285
Descriptive statistics on the four common semen quality parameters
| Percentage of fast forward motile spermatozoa (%) | 48.10 (41.90, 55.10) | 31.30 (25.00, 46.40) | 36.10 (25.00, 46.40) |
| Percentage of total forward motile spermatozoa (%) | 64.80 (57.80, 72.05) | 45.90 (34.40, 56.20) | 51.30 (40.10, 62.90) |
| Percentage of sperm with normal morphology (%) | 6.90 (5.30, 9.50) | 2.60 (1.30, 4.30) | 3.60 (1.70, 6.20) |
| Semen volume (ml) | 3.11 (1.28) | 2.95 (1.75) | 2.99 (1.65) |
Data of percentage of fast forward motile spermatozoa, percentage of total forward motile spermatozoa, and percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology presented as median (first quartile, third quartile), while for semen volume presented as mean (s.d.). s.d.: standard deviation
Comparison of semen quality in infertile male patients of different age groups
| Percentage of fast forward motile spermatozoa (%), median (IQR) | 36.00a (24.70, 46.10) | 36.40ab (25.30, 46.80) | 36.80b (26.00, 47.00) | 35.60a (24.60, 45.70) | 33.4c (21.25, 43.65) |
| Percentage of total forward motile spermatozoa (%), median (IQR) | 50.80a (39.30, 49.14) | 51.80b (40.80, 63.40) | 52.10c (41.10, 63.70) | 50.60a (39.20, 62.10) | 47.7d (34.80, 59.40) |
| Percentage of sperm with normal morphology (%), median (IQR) | 3.40a (1.60, 5.60) | 3.50ab (1.60, 6.10) | 3.80c (1.80, 6.50) | 3.60bc (1.80, 6.20) | 3.40ab (1.60, 5.70) |
| Semen volume (ml), mean (s.d.) | 3.17a (0.35) | 3.10a (1.79) | 2.97b (1.43) | 2.89c (1.87) | 2.71d (1.31) |
Significance level is 0.05. Among columns, figures with the same superscript are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript are significantly different. The comparison of measurement data between groups used single-factor analysis of variance and the SNK test, while the variance was tested as homogeneity, otherwise Kruskal–Wallis multiple comparison was used. IQR: interquartile range; s.d.: standard deviation; SNK: Student–Newman–Keuls
Comparison of semen quality in infertile male patients of different occupational groups
| Percentage of fast forward motile spermatozoa (%), median (IQR) | 35.90a (24.70, 46.20) | 38.60bc (28.57, 49.17) | 34.8d (24.00, 45.00) | 40.50be (29.70, 51.95) | 40.00ace (28.05, 49.00) |
| Percentage of total forward motile spermatozoa (%), median (IQR) | 51.20a (40.0, 62.70) | 54.65b (43.42, 65.33) | 49.40a (38.30, 61.00) | 56.40c (44.70, 68.45) | 54.80bc (41.95, 66.60) |
| Percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology (%), median (IQR) | 3.5a (1.70, 6.10) | 4.00b (2.10, 7.00) | 3.50c (1.70, 6.00) | 5.4d (2.55, 8.90) | 5.40abc (2.30, 7.90) |
| Semen volume (ml), mean (s.d.) | 2.99a (1.6) | 3.0ab (1.43) | 3.0a (2.39) | 2.8bc (1.29) | 2.8ac (1.25) |
Significance level is 0.05. Among columns, figures with the same superscript are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript are significantly different. The comparison of measurement data between groups used single-factor analysis of variance and the SNK test, while the variance was tested as homogeneity, otherwise Kruskal–Wallis multiple comparison was used. IQR: interquartile range; s.d.: standard deviation; SNK: Student–Newman–Keuls