Literature DB >> 33433290

Comparison of surgical gloves: perforation, satisfaction and manual dexterity.

Tulay Basak1, Gul Sahin2, Ayla Demirtas1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of two different surgical gloves (powdered latex and powder and latex free) for glove perforation frequency, problems and satisfaction with glove usage and manual dexterity levels during surgical operations that include scrub nurses. Scrub nurses wore antiallergenic gloves (powder and latex free) gloves during three operations, double latex and powdered gloves during three operations and single latex and powdered gloves during three operations. The gloves were checked for punctures after each surgery with a water-inflation test. In our study, 19% of single gloves and 18.1 % of double gloves and 4.8% of powder and latex free worn by scrub nurses were punctured during surgery. None of the inner gloves in double gloves were punctured. Although wearing double gloves restricts manual dexterity, results in discomfort problems such as perspiration and fetor and results in a low satisfaction rate among scrub nurses, double gloves are protective against injuries and punctures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  manual dexterity; perforation; satisfaction; scrub nurse; surgical gloves

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33433290     DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1875636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Saf Ergon        ISSN: 1080-3548


  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Protective Gloves on Manual Dexterity in Cold Environments-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Joanna Orysiak; Magdalena Młynarczyk; Emilia Irzmańska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.