Yixuan Ye1, Xi Chen2,3, James Han2,3, Wei Jiang4, Pradeep Natarajan5,6, Hongyu Zhao1,4. 1. Program of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (Y.Y., H.Z.), Yale University. 2. Department of Statistics and Data Science (X.C., J.H.), Yale University. 3. Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry (X.C., J.H.), Yale University. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (W.J., H.Z.). 5. Center for Genomic Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (P.N.). 6. Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard & Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (P.N.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both lifestyle and genetic factors confer risk for cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia. However, the interactions between these 2 groups of risk factors were not comprehensively understood due to previous poor estimation of genetic risk. Here we set out to develop enhanced polygenic risk scores (PRS) and systematically investigate multiplicative and additive interactions between PRS and lifestyle for coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-cholesterol. METHODS: Our study included 276 096 unrelated White British participants from the UK Biobank. We investigated several PRS methods (P+T, LDpred, PRS continuous shrinkage, and AnnoPred) and showed that AnnoPred achieved consistently improved prediction accuracy for all 6 diseases/traits. With enhanced PRS and combined lifestyle status categorized by smoking, body mass index, physical activity, and diet, we investigated both multiplicative and additive interactions between PRS and lifestyle using regression models. RESULTS: We observed that healthy lifestyle reduced disease incidence by similar multiplicative magnitude across different PRS groups. The absolute risk reduction from lifestyle adherence was, however, significantly greater in individuals with higher PRS. Specifically, for type 2 diabetes, the absolute risk reduction from lifestyle adherence was 12.4% (95% CI, 10.0%-14.9%) in the top 1% PRS versus 2.8% (95% CI, 2.3%-3.3%) in the bottom PRS decile, leading to a ratio of >4.4. We also observed a significant interaction effect between PRS and lifestyle on triglyceride level. CONCLUSIONS: By leveraging functional annotations, AnnoPred outperforms state-of-the-art methods on quantifying genetic risk through PRS. Our analyses based on enhanced PRS suggest that individuals with high genetic risk may derive similar relative but greater absolute benefit from lifestyle adherence.
BACKGROUND: Both lifestyle and genetic factors confer risk for cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia. However, the interactions between these 2 groups of risk factors were not comprehensively understood due to previous poor estimation of genetic risk. Here we set out to develop enhanced polygenic risk scores (PRS) and systematically investigate multiplicative and additive interactions between PRS and lifestyle for coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-cholesterol. METHODS: Our study included 276 096 unrelated White British participants from the UK Biobank. We investigated several PRS methods (P+T, LDpred, PRS continuous shrinkage, and AnnoPred) and showed that AnnoPred achieved consistently improved prediction accuracy for all 6 diseases/traits. With enhanced PRS and combined lifestyle status categorized by smoking, body mass index, physical activity, and diet, we investigated both multiplicative and additive interactions between PRS and lifestyle using regression models. RESULTS: We observed that healthy lifestyle reduced disease incidence by similar multiplicative magnitude across different PRS groups. The absolute risk reduction from lifestyle adherence was, however, significantly greater in individuals with higher PRS. Specifically, for type 2 diabetes, the absolute risk reduction from lifestyle adherence was 12.4% (95% CI, 10.0%-14.9%) in the top 1% PRS versus 2.8% (95% CI, 2.3%-3.3%) in the bottom PRS decile, leading to a ratio of >4.4. We also observed a significant interaction effect between PRS and lifestyle on triglyceride level. CONCLUSIONS: By leveraging functional annotations, AnnoPred outperforms state-of-the-art methods on quantifying genetic risk through PRS. Our analyses based on enhanced PRS suggest that individuals with high genetic risk may derive similar relative but greater absolute benefit from lifestyle adherence.
Authors: Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson; Karen M Eddleman; Nicole M Jarrett; Ken LaBresh; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Scott M Grundy; Neil J Stone; Alison L Bailey; Craig Beam; Kim K Birtcher; Roger S Blumenthal; Lynne T Braun; Sarah de Ferranti; Joseph Faiella-Tommasino; Daniel E Forman; Ronald Goldberg; Paul A Heidenreich; Mark A Hlatky; Daniel W Jones; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Nuria Lopez-Pajares; Chiadi E Ndumele; Carl E Orringer; Carmen A Peralta; Joseph J Saseen; Sidney C Smith; Laurence Sperling; Salim S Virani; Joseph Yeboah Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rachel R Huxley; Jeffrey R Misialek; Sunil K Agarwal; Laura R Loehr; Elsayed Z Soliman; Lin Y Chen; Alvaro Alonso Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-06-06
Authors: Christopher C Chang; Carson C Chow; Laurent Cam Tellier; Shashaank Vattikuti; Shaun M Purcell; James J Lee Journal: Gigascience Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 6.524
Authors: Jordi Merino; Kathleen A Jablonski; Josep M Mercader; Steven E Kahn; Ling Chen; Maegan Harden; Linda M Delahanty; Maria Rosario G Araneta; Geoffrey A Walford; Suzanne B R Jacobs; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Paul W Franks; William C Knowler; Jose C Florez Journal: Diabetes Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Majid Nikpay; Anuj Goel; Hong-Hee Won; Leanne M Hall; Christina Willenborg; Stavroula Kanoni; Danish Saleheen; Theodosios Kyriakou; Christopher P Nelson; Jemma C Hopewell; Thomas R Webb; Lingyao Zeng; Abbas Dehghan; Maris Alver; Sebastian M Armasu; Kirsi Auro; Andrew Bjonnes; Daniel I Chasman; Shufeng Chen; Ian Ford; Nora Franceschini; Christian Gieger; Christopher Grace; Stefan Gustafsson; Jie Huang; Shih-Jen Hwang; Yun Kyoung Kim; Marcus E Kleber; King Wai Lau; Xiangfeng Lu; Yingchang Lu; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Evelin Mihailov; Alanna C Morrison; Natalia Pervjakova; Liming Qu; Lynda M Rose; Elias Salfati; Richa Saxena; Markus Scholz; Albert V Smith; Emmi Tikkanen; Andre Uitterlinden; Xueli Yang; Weihua Zhang; Wei Zhao; Mariza de Andrade; Paul S de Vries; Natalie R van Zuydam; Sonia S Anand; Lars Bertram; Frank Beutner; George Dedoussis; Philippe Frossard; Dominique Gauguier; Alison H Goodall; Omri Gottesman; Marc Haber; Bok-Ghee Han; Jianfeng Huang; Shapour Jalilzadeh; Thorsten Kessler; Inke R König; Lars Lannfelt; Wolfgang Lieb; Lars Lind; Cecilia M Lindgren; Marja-Liisa Lokki; Patrik K Magnusson; Nadeem H Mallick; Narinder Mehra; Thomas Meitinger; Fazal-Ur-Rehman Memon; Andrew P Morris; Markku S Nieminen; Nancy L Pedersen; Annette Peters; Loukianos S Rallidis; Asif Rasheed; Maria Samuel; Svati H Shah; Juha Sinisalo; Kathleen E Stirrups; Stella Trompet; Laiyuan Wang; Khan S Zaman; Diego Ardissino; Eric Boerwinkle; Ingrid B Borecki; Erwin P Bottinger; Julie E Buring; John C Chambers; Rory Collins; L Adrienne Cupples; John Danesh; Ilja Demuth; Roberto Elosua; Stephen E Epstein; Tõnu Esko; Mary F Feitosa; Oscar H Franco; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Christopher B Granger; Dongfeng Gu; Vilmundur Gudnason; Alistair S Hall; Anders Hamsten; Tamara B Harris; Stanley L Hazen; Christian Hengstenberg; Albert Hofman; Erik Ingelsson; Carlos Iribarren; J Wouter Jukema; Pekka J Karhunen; Bong-Jo Kim; Jaspal S Kooner; Iftikhar J Kullo; Terho Lehtimäki; Ruth J F Loos; Olle Melander; Andres Metspalu; Winfried März; Colin N Palmer; Markus Perola; Thomas Quertermous; Daniel J Rader; Paul M Ridker; Samuli Ripatti; Robert Roberts; Veikko Salomaa; Dharambir K Sanghera; Stephen M Schwartz; Udo Seedorf; Alexandre F Stewart; David J Stott; Joachim Thiery; Pierre A Zalloua; Christopher J O'Donnell; Muredach P Reilly; Themistocles L Assimes; John R Thompson; Jeanette Erdmann; Robert Clarke; Hugh Watkins; Sekar Kathiresan; Ruth McPherson; Panos Deloukas; Heribert Schunkert; Nilesh J Samani; Martin Farrall Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Andrew R Marderstein; Scott Kulm; Cheng Peng; Rulla Tamimi; Andrew G Clark; Olivier Elemento Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Alexandra J Noble; Rachel V Purcell; Alex T Adams; Ying K Lam; Paulina M Ring; Jessica R Anderson; Amy J Osborne Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Natalie R Hasbani; Symen Ligthart; Michael R Brown; Adam S Heath; Allison Bebo; Kellan E Ashley; Eric Boerwinkle; Alanna C Morrison; Aaron R Folsom; David Aguilar; Paul S de Vries Journal: Circulation Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Akl C Fahed; Minxian Wang; Aniruddh P Patel; Ezimamaka Ajufo; Dimitri J Maamari; Krishna G Aragam; Deanna G Brockman; Trish Vosburg; Patrick T Ellinor; Kenney Ng; Amit V Khera Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-03-01
Authors: Evan D Muse; Shang-Fu Chen; Shuchen Liu; Brianna Fernandez; Brian Schrader; Bhuvan Molparia; André Nicolás León; Raymond Lee; Neha Pubbi; Nolan Mejia; Christina Ren; Ahmed El-Kalliny; Ernesto Prado Montes de Oca; Hector Aguilar; Arjun Ghoshal; Raquel Dias; Doug Evans; Kai-Yu Chen; Yunyue Zhang; Nathan E Wineinger; Emily G Spencer; Eric J Topol; Ali Torkamani Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2022-03-11