Literature DB >> 33432446

DeepCAT: Deep Computer-Aided Triage of Screening Mammography.

Paul H Yi1,2, Dhananjay Singh3, Susan C Harvey4, Gregory D Hager3, Lisa A Mullen5,3.   

Abstract

Although much deep learning research has focused on mammographic detection of breast cancer, relatively little attention has been paid to mammography triage for radiologist review. The purpose of this study was to develop and test DeepCAT, a deep learning system for mammography triage based on suspicion of cancer. Specifically, we evaluate DeepCAT's ability to provide two augmentations to radiologists: (1) discarding images unlikely to have cancer from radiologist review and (2) prioritization of images likely to contain cancer. We used 1878 2D-mammographic images (CC & MLO) from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography to develop DeepCAT, a deep learning triage system composed of 2 components: (1) mammogram classifier cascade and (2) mass detector, which are combined to generate an overall priority score. This priority score is used to order images for radiologist review. Of 595 testing images, DeepCAT recommended low priority for 315 images (53%), of which none contained a malignant mass. In evaluation of prioritizing images according to likelihood of containing cancer, DeepCAT's study ordering required an average of 26 adjacent swaps to obtain perfect review order. Our results suggest that DeepCAT could substantially increase efficiency for breast imagers and effectively triage review of mammograms with malignant masses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Breast cancer screening; Breast imaging; Deep learning; Mammography; Triage

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33432446      PMCID: PMC7887113          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00407-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  20 in total

1.  A novel featureless approach to mass detection in digital mammograms based on support vector machines.

Authors:  Renato Campanini; Danilo Dongiovanni; Emiro Iampieri; Nico Lanconelli; Matteo Masotti; Giuseppe Palermo; Alessandro Riccardi; Matteo Roffilli
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Workforce shortages in breast imaging: impact on mammography utilization.

Authors:  Paul Wing; Margaret H Langelier
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection.

Authors:  Tsung-Yi Lin; Priya Goyal; Ross Girshick; Kaiming He; Piotr Dollar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Improving Workflow Efficiency for Mammography Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Trent Kyono; Fiona J Gilbert; Mihaela van der Schaar
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Automated Critical Test Findings Identification and Online Notification System Using Artificial Intelligence in Imaging.

Authors:  Luciano M Prevedello; Barbaros S Erdal; John L Ryu; Kevin J Little; Mutlu Demirer; Songyue Qian; Richard D White
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.

Authors:  Lucien E M Duijm; Johanna H Groenewoud; Jacques Fracheboud; B Martin van Ineveld; Rudi M H Roumen; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Hiba Chougrad; Hamid Zouaki; Omar Alheyane
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Deep neural network improves fracture detection by clinicians.

Authors:  Robert Lindsey; Aaron Daluiski; Sumit Chopra; Alexander Lachapelle; Michael Mozer; Serge Sicular; Douglas Hanel; Michael Gardner; Anurag Gupta; Robert Hotchkiss; Hollis Potter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Deep Learning to Improve Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Li Shen; Laurie R Margolies; Joseph H Rothstein; Eugene Fluder; Russell McBride; Weiva Sieh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  PENet-a scalable deep-learning model for automated diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using volumetric CT imaging.

Authors:  Shih-Cheng Huang; Tanay Kothari; Imon Banerjee; Chris Chute; Robyn L Ball; Norah Borus; Andrew Huang; Bhavik N Patel; Pranav Rajpurkar; Jeremy Irvin; Jared Dunnmon; Joseph Bledsoe; Katie Shpanskaya; Abhay Dhaliwal; Roham Zamanian; Andrew Y Ng; Matthew P Lungren
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-04-24
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Early Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Benjamin Hunter; Sumeet Hindocha; Richard W Lee
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.