Literature DB >> 33432385

[Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the esophagus].

B Babic1, L M Schiffmann1, W Schröder1, C J Bruns1, H F Fuchs2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thoracoabdominal esophagectomy still plays a major role in the oncological treatment for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive procedures were developed to reduce the high rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality without negatively affecting the oncological outcome.
OBJECTIVE: What evidence supports minimally invasive oncological surgery of the esophagus? Do patients benefit from minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to an open approach? Is the reduction of surgical access trauma specifically advantageous?
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Review, evaluation and critical analysis of the international literature.
RESULTS: A reduction in postoperative morbidity by decreasing surgical trauma was confirmed by three prospective randomized clinical trials, while showing at least similar oncological outcomes. Diverse retrospective analyses and meta-analyses also came to the same result.
CONCLUSION: A minimization of surgical access trauma during thoracoabdominal esophagectomy reduces postoperative morbidity compared to conventional open surgery. Recent evidence suggests that oncological outcomes are not altered depending on the surgical approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Outcome; Robot assisted esophagectomy; Surgical techniques

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33432385     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01337-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  22 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Santiago Horgan; Robert A Berger; Enrique F Elli; N Joseph Espat
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 2.  Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiao Ma; Su Yang; Xiaoli Zhu; Wei Qin; Jiaqing Xiang; Toni Lerut; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Oliver C Burdall; Alexander P Boddy; James Fullick; Jane Blazeby; Richard Krysztopik; Christopher Streets; Andrew Hollowood; Christopher P Barham; Dan Titcomb
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  F Lordick; C Mariette; K Haustermans; R Obermannová; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Hans F Fuchs; Cristina R Harnsberger; Ryan C Broderick; David C Chang; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Michael Bouvet; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1409.

Authors:  Kozo Kataoka; Hiroya Takeuchi; Junki Mizusawa; Masahiko Ando; Yasuhiro Tsubosa; Kazuo Koyanagi; Hiroyuki Daiko; Satoru Matsuda; Kenichi Nakamura; Ken Kato; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Endoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy for cancer using the right thoracoscopic approach.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yin-Kai Chao; Kuang-Tse Pan; Chih-Tsung Wen; Hsin-Yueh Fang; Ming-Ju Hsieh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Laparoscopically assisted versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer-the Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open (ROMIO) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Authors:  Rachel C Brierley; Daisy Gaunt; Chris Metcalfe; Jane M Blazeby; Natalie S Blencowe; Marcus Jepson; Richard G Berrisford; Kerry N L Avery; William Hollingworth; Caoimhe T Rice; Aida Moure-Fernandez; Newton Wong; Joanna Nicklin; Anni Skilton; Alex Boddy; James P Byrne; Tim Underwood; Ravi Vohra; James A Catton; Kish Pursnani; Rachel Melhado; Bilal Alkhaffaf; Richard Krysztopik; Peter Lamb; Lucy Culliford; Chris Rogers; Benjamin Howes; Katy Chalmers; Sian Cousins; Jackie Elliott; Jenny Donovan; Rachael Heys; Robin A Wickens; Paul Wilkerson; Andrew Hollowood; Christopher Streets; Dan Titcomb; Martyn Lee Humphreys; Tim Wheatley; Grant Sanders; Arun Ariyarathenam; Jamie Kelly; Fergus Noble; Graeme Couper; Richard J E Skipworth; Chris Deans; Sukhbir Ubhi; Robert Williams; David Bowrey; David Exon; Paul Turner; Vinutha Daya Shetty; Ram Chaparala; Khurshid Akhtar; Naheed Farooq; Simon L Parsons; Neil T Welch; Rebecca J Houlihan; Joanne Smith; Rachel Schranz; Nicola Rea; Jill Cooke; Alexandra Williams; Carolyn Hindmarsh; Sally Maitland; Lucy Howie; Christopher Paul Barham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer--the ROMIO (Randomized Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kerry N L Avery; Chris Metcalfe; Richard Berrisford; C Paul Barham; Jenny L Donovan; Jackie Elliott; Stephen J Falk; Rob Goldin; George Hanna; Andrew A Hollowood; Richard Krysztopik; Sian Noble; Grant Sanders; Christopher G Streets; Dan R Titcomb; Tim Wheatley; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.