Literature DB >> 33432358

Real-world experience of effectiveness of non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

Andrew R Melville1,2, Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof1,2, John Fitton1,2, Leticia Garcia-Montoya1,2, Lynda Bailey3, Shouvik Dass1,2, Paul Emery1,2, Maya H Buch1,4, Benazir Saleem3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of non-medical switch from rituximab originator (RTX-O) to biosimilar (RTX-B) in patients with RA.
METHODS: Between October 2017 and October 2019, all patients on RTX-O in our centre requiring re-treatment were switched to RTX-B unless declined by the patient or specified by the treating clinician. Switch strategy effectiveness was assessed retrospectively using DAS28-CRP(3) and RTX retention, with patients remaining on RTX-O as a comparator group.
RESULTS: The number of patients switching to RTX-B was 255/337 (75.7%) while 82 (24.3%) remained on RTX-O. There was no difference in DAS28-CRP(3) 4 months post-RTX-B switch vs the same time point post-RTX-O previous cycle (paired data available in 60%). Eighteen-month retention estimates were 75.6% (95% CI: 69.4, 80.7%) for RTX-B group and 82.3% (95% CI: 70.4, 89.8%) for RTX-O [adjusted hazard ratio 1.52 (95% CI: 0.85, 2.73)]. The number of patients who discontinued RTX-B for loss of effectiveness (LOE) was 42/255 (16.5%), five (2.0%) for adverse effects (AEs). Risk of RTX-B discontinuation was associated with comorbidities and ≥2 previous biologic DMARDs. Risk of adverse outcome RTX cessation was associated with comorbidities, and reduced risk with number of previous RTX-O cycles and pre-switch cycle B cell depletion. The number of patients who switched back to RTX-O was 34/255 (13.3%) (LOE: 30, AEs: 4), while 13/255 (5.1%) started other biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs. Of patients who switched back for LOE, 28/30 remained on RTX-O at a mean 7.7 months follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Non-medical switch to RTX-B was largely effective. Factors associated with RTX-B discontinuation, including comorbidities, previous biologic DMARDs, and RTX-O treatment history, may inform switch decisions. Most patients who switched back to RTX-O for LOE remained on treatment at short-term follow-up.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B cells; bDMARDs; biosimilars; rheumatoid arthritis; rituximab

Year:  2021        PMID: 33432358     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  4 in total

1.  Real-world single-centre experience of rheumatoid arthritis patients requiring four or more higher cost drugs: response and duration of treatment.

Authors:  David Walker; Iain Goff; Sandra Robinson
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  [Use of biosimilars in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis : An overview].

Authors:  Harriet Morf; Thorben Witte
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 3.  Natural and iatrogenic ocular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosanna Dammacco; Silvana Guerriero; Giovanni Alessio; Franco Dammacco
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 2.029

Review 4.  Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in China: A patent review.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Liu; Yu-Huan Yang; Nan Wu; Ji-Fu Wei
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 6.832

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.