Literature DB >> 33432172

Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach.

Abdul Rahman Diab1, Bryan Haslam1, Jiye G Kim1, William Lotter2, Giorgia Grisot1, Eric Wu1,3, Kevin Wu1,4, Jorge Onieva Onieva1, Yun Boyer1, Jerrold L Boxerman5,6, Meiyun Wang7, Mack Bandler8, Gopal R Vijayaraghavan9, A Gregory Sorensen10.   

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a global challenge, causing over 600,000 deaths in 2018 (ref. 1). To achieve earlier cancer detection, health organizations worldwide recommend screening mammography, which is estimated to decrease breast cancer mortality by 20-40% (refs. 2,3). Despite the clear value of screening mammography, significant false positive and false negative rates along with non-uniformities in expert reader availability leave opportunities for improving quality and access4,5. To address these limitations, there has been much recent interest in applying deep learning to mammography6-18, and these efforts have highlighted two key difficulties: obtaining large amounts of annotated training data and ensuring generalization across populations, acquisition equipment and modalities. Here we present an annotation-efficient deep learning approach that (1) achieves state-of-the-art performance in mammogram classification, (2) successfully extends to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT; '3D mammography'), (3) detects cancers in clinically negative prior mammograms of patients with cancer, (4) generalizes well to a population with low screening rates and (5) outperforms five out of five full-time breast-imaging specialists with an average increase in sensitivity of 14%. By creating new 'maximum suspicion projection' (MSP) images from DBT data, our progressively trained, multiple-instance learning approach effectively trains on DBT exams using only breast-level labels while maintaining localization-based interpretability. Altogether, our results demonstrate promise towards software that can improve the accuracy of and access to screening mammography worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33432172      PMCID: PMC9426656          DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-01174-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   87.241


  35 in total

1.  Performance benchmarks for screening mammography.

Authors:  Robert D Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Linn A Abraham; Edward A Sickles; Constance D Lehman; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Donald L Weaver; William E Barlow; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz; Kristina Lång; Albert Gubern-Merida; Mireille Broeders; Gisella Gennaro; Paola Clauser; Thomas H Helbich; Margarita Chevalier; Tao Tan; Thomas Mertelmeier; Matthew G Wallis; Ingvar Andersson; Sophia Zackrisson; Ritse M Mann; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Thijs Kooi; Geert Litjens; Bram van Ginneken; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Clara I Sánchez; Ritse Mann; Ard den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Adam Yala; Constance Lehman; Tal Schuster; Tally Portnoi; Regina Barzilay
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Elizabeth Krupinski; Jan-Jurre Mordang; Kathy Schilling; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Scott Mayer McKinney; Marcin Sieniek; Varun Godbole; Jonathan Godwin; Natasha Antropova; Hutan Ashrafian; Trevor Back; Mary Chesus; Greg S Corrado; Ara Darzi; Mozziyar Etemadi; Florencia Garcia-Vicente; Fiona J Gilbert; Mark Halling-Brown; Demis Hassabis; Sunny Jansen; Alan Karthikesalingam; Christopher J Kelly; Dominic King; Joseph R Ledsam; David Melnick; Hormuz Mostofi; Lily Peng; Joshua Jay Reicher; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Richard Sidebottom; Mustafa Suleyman; Daniel Tse; Kenneth C Young; Jeffrey De Fauw; Shravya Shetty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data.

Authors:  D Hart; E Shochat; Z Agur
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Breast cancer tumor growth estimated through mammography screening data.

Authors:  Harald Weedon-Fekjaer; Bo H Lindqvist; Lars J Vatten; Odd O Aalen; Steinar Tretli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  Breast Density and Risk of Breast Cancer in Asian Women: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae; Eun Hee Kim
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2016-10-21
View more
  26 in total

1.  Machine Learning for Workflow Applications in Screening Mammography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah E Hickman; Ramona Woitek; Elizabeth Phuong Vi Le; Yu Ri Im; Carina Mouritsen Luxhøj; Angelica I Aviles-Rivero; Gabrielle C Baxter; James W MacKay; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Deep Learning Predicts Interval and Screening-detected Cancer from Screening Mammograms: A Case-Case-Control Study in 6369 Women.

Authors:  Xun Zhu; Thomas K Wolfgruber; Lambert Leong; Matthew Jensen; Christopher Scott; Stacey Winham; Peter Sadowski; Celine Vachon; Karla Kerlikowske; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography.

Authors:  Lan-Anh Dang; Emmanuel Chazard; Edouard Poncelet; Teodora Serb; Aniela Rusu; Xavier Pauwels; Clémence Parsy; Thibault Poclet; Hugo Cauliez; Constance Engelaere; Guillaume Ramette; Charlotte Brienne; Sofiane Dujardin; Nicolas Laurent
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Emerging and future use of intra-surgical volumetric X-ray imaging and adjuvant tools for decision support in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Samuel S Streeter; Brady Hunt; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Bio-Imaging-Based Machine Learning Algorithm for Breast Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Sadia Safdar; Muhammad Rizwan; Thippa Reddy Gadekallu; Abdul Rehman Javed; Mohammad Khalid Imam Rahmani; Khurram Jawad; Surbhi Bhatia
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03

6.  A Data Set and Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Masses and Architectural Distortions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.

Authors:  Mateusz Buda; Ashirbani Saha; Ruth Walsh; Sujata Ghate; Nianyi Li; Albert Swiecicki; Joseph Y Lo; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review.

Authors:  Ana Barragán-Montero; Umair Javaid; Gilmer Valdés; Dan Nguyen; Paul Desbordes; Benoit Macq; Siri Willems; Liesbeth Vandewinckele; Mats Holmström; Fredrik Löfman; Steven Michiels; Kevin Souris; Edmond Sterpin; John A Lee
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  Independent External Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Automated Interpretation of Screening Mammography: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna W Anderson; M Luke Marinovich; Nehmat Houssami; Kathryn P Lowry; Joann G Elmore; Diana S M Buist; Solveig Hofvind; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  The added value of an artificial intelligence system in assisting radiologists on indeterminate BI-RADS 0 mammograms.

Authors:  Chunyan Yi; Yuxing Tang; Rushan Ouyang; Yanbo Zhang; Zhenjie Cao; Zhicheng Yang; Shibin Wu; Mei Han; Jing Xiao; Peng Chang; Jie Ma
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  High Precision Mammography Lesion Identification From Imprecise Medical Annotations.

Authors:  Ulzee An; Ankit Bhardwaj; Khader Shameer; Lakshminarayanan Subramanian
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2021-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.