Literature DB >> 33430831

Current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study.

Guiyi Ji1, Ting Bao1, Zhenzhen Li1, Huairong Tang1, Dan Liu2, Ping Yang3,4, Weimin Li2,5,6,7, Yan Huang8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite much research published on lung cancer screening, China has had no large-scale study on the missed diagnosis of lung cancer in a health examination population. We therefore did a real-world study using the current lung cancer screening guidelines to a health examination population in China to determine the proportion of lung cancer cases that have been missed.
METHODS: A real-world cohort study of screening, with the use of low-dose computed tomography, was conducted among people who took yearly health checkup in health management center of West China Hospital between 2006 and 2017. We respectively used current guidelines including lung cancer screening guidelines of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and expert consensus on low dose spiral CT lung cancer screening in China.
RESULTS: In a total of 15,996 participants with health examination who completed the baseline screening, 6779 (42.4%) subjects had at least one positive finding, and 142 (2.1%) cases of lung cancer were screened positive. The false positive rate was 97.9%. Of 142 lung cancer cases detected in our study, only 9.2% met the lung cancer screening guidelines proposed by the USPSTF, and 24.4% met that of China. The rates of missed diagnosis were as high as 90.8 and 75.6% respectively. In addition, we did an in-depth analysis by gender. We found that among male patients with lung cancer, the proportion of smokers was 75%, and the proportion of young people under 50 was 23.2%. Among female patients with lung cancer, the proportion of smokers was only 5.8%, and the proportion of young people under 50 was up to 33.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of missed diagnosis was as high as 90.8% applying the current lung cancer screening guidelines to the health examination population in China. Further study to determine screening guidelines for targeted populations, is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health examination population; High-risk population; LDCT; Lung cancer; Real-world study; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33430831      PMCID: PMC7802250          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07750-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  49 in total

1.  Smoking and carcinoma of the lung. Preliminary report. 1950.

Authors:  R Doll; A B Hill
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  A risk model for prediction of lung cancer.

Authors:  Margaret R Spitz; Waun Ki Hong; Christopher I Amos; Xifeng Wu; Matthew B Schabath; Qiong Dong; Sanjay Shete; Carol J Etzel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Molecular epidemiology of lung cancer and geographic variations with special reference to EGFR mutations.

Authors:  Tetsuya Mitsudomi
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08

5.  Trends in the proportion of patients with lung cancer meeting screening criteria.

Authors:  Yi Wang; David E Midthun; Jason A Wampfler; Bo Deng; Shawn M Stoddard; Shuo Zhang; Ping Yang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Computed Tomography Screening Workshop 2011 report.

Authors:  John K Field; Robert A Smith; Denise R Aberle; Matthijs Oudkerk; David R Baldwin; David Yankelevitz; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Scott James Swanson; William D Travis; Ignacio I Wisbuba; Masayuki Noguchi; Jim L Mulshine
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Cancer incidence and mortality among young adults aged 20-39 years worldwide in 2012: a population-based study.

Authors:  Miranda M Fidler; Sumit Gupta; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Jacques Ferlay; Eva Steliarova-Foucher; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  CT quality assurance in the lung screening study component of the National Lung Screening Trial: implications for multicenter imaging trials.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Kavita Garg; Hrudaya Nath; Diane C Strollo; Richard M Fagerstrom; Melissa B Ford
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Patterns in lung cancer incidence rates and trends by histologic type in the United States, 2004-2009.

Authors:  Keisha A Houston; S Jane Henley; Jun Li; Mary C White; Thomas B Richards
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Proportion and clinical features of never-smokers with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jaeyoung Cho; Sun Mi Choi; Jinwoo Lee; Chang-Hoon Lee; Sang-Min Lee; Dong-Wan Kim; Jae-Joon Yim; Young Tae Kim; Chul-Gyu Yoo; Young Whan Kim; Sung Koo Han; Young Sik Park
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2017-02-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  The importance of endobag use with incision-protective devices in VATS lung resection: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Carlos Andrés Latorre Noguera; Agnaldo José Lopes; Ivan Mathias Filho; Claudio Higa; Rodolfo Acatauassú Nunes; Carlos Eduardo Teixeira Lima; Eduardo Haruo Saito
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  Higher frequency of new chest tumor diagnoses in emergency department due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Klaudia Krzyzaniak; Mariusz Sieminski
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 4.093

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.