Literature DB >> 33430817

Efficacy and acceptability of parent-only group cognitive behavioral intervention for treatment of anxiety disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Bangmin Yin1,2,3, Teng Teng2,3, Lyu Tong4, Xuemei Li2,3, Li Fan2,3, Xinyu Zhou5, Peng Xie6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorder is the most prevalent mental disorder among children and adolescents, causing significant psychosocial problems and physical health conditions. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for anxiety disorder in children and adolescents. And parent-only CBT is an alternative treatment for childhood anxiety disorder, which includes psychologists and parents rather than children in the treatment. As a new type of CBT, parent-only CBT has some advantages. However, it remains unclear whether parent-only CBT interventions are effective for treating children and adolescents with anxiety disorder.
METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the efficacy (the mean change scores of the anxiety rating scale from baseline to post-treatment, standardized mean difference SMD) and acceptability (the proportion of patients in the treatment group who withdrew from treatment early for any reason, risk ratios RRs) of parent-only cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for children and adolescents with anxiety disorder. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest, and PsycINFO from inception to June 2019. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing parent-only CBT either with waitlist (WL), or CBT with parents in children and adolescents with anxiety disorder.
RESULTS: Finally, six RCTs with 407 participants were included in the meta-analyses. In terms of efficacy, pooled analyses indicated that parent-only CBT was significantly more effective than WL for reducing anxiety symptoms with SMD of - 0.72 (95% CI - 1.41 to - 0.03, p = 0.04), and more remission rate with RR of 4.33 (37.96% vs. 6.85, 95% CI 1.82 to 10.27, p = 0.0009) at post-treatment. And our analyses showed no evidence that parent-only CBT had significantly greater efficacy than CBT with parents with SMD of 0.21 (95% CI - 0.09 to 0.50, p = 0.17). Acceptability in the parent-only CBT group was not significantly different to the WL group with RR of 0.92 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.62, p = 0.77), and was significantly worse than in the CBT with parents group with RR of 1.93 (95% CI 1.05 to 3.57, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence indicates that parent-only CBT can be an alternative and acceptable intervention for treating children and adolescents with anxiety disorder.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Anxiety; Child; Meta-analysis; Parent-only CBT

Year:  2021        PMID: 33430817      PMCID: PMC7802251          DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-03021-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Psychiatry        ISSN: 1471-244X            Impact factor:   3.630


  2 in total

1.  Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Authors:  Miranda Cumpston; Tianjing Li; Matthew J Page; Jacqueline Chandler; Vivian A Welch; Julian Pt Higgins; James Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-03

2.  [A new draft of the mental disorders classification prepared by the American Psychiatric Association: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-IV, Options Book].

Authors:  J Rabe-Jabłońska
Journal:  Psychiatr Pol       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.657

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Correction to: Efficacy and acceptability of parent-only group cognitive behavioral intervention for treatment of anxiety disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Bangmin Yin; Teng Teng; Lyu Tong; Xuemei Li; Li Fan; Xinyu Zhou; Peng Xie
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.630

2.  A Brief Cognitive Behavioural Intervention for Parents of Anxious Children: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

Authors:  C Jewell; A Wittkowski; S Collinge; Daniel Pratt
Journal:  Child Youth Care Forum       Date:  2022-08-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.