Micki Hill1, Paul C Lambert2,3, Michael J Crowther2,3. 1. Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. mh594@le.ac.uk. 2. Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. 3. Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multi-state models are being increasingly used to capture complex disease pathways. The convenient formula of the exponential multi-state model can facilitate a quick and accessible understanding of the data. However, assuming time constant transition rates is not always plausible. On the other hand, obtaining predictions from a fitted model with time-dependent transitions can be challenging. One proposed solution is to utilise a general simulation algorithm to calculate predictions from a fitted multi-state model. METHODS: Predictions obtained from an exponential multi-state model were compared to those obtained from two different parametric models and to non-parametric Aalen-Johansen estimates. The first comparative approach fitted a multi-state model with transition-specific distributions, chosen separately based on the Akaike Information Criterion. The second approach was a Royston-Parmar multi-state model with 4 degrees of freedom, which was chosen as a reference model flexible enough to capture complex hazard shapes. All quantities were obtained analytically for the exponential and Aalen-Johansen approaches. The transition rates for the two comparative approaches were also obtained analytically, while all other quantities were obtained from the fitted models via a general simulation algorithm. Metrics investigated were: transition probabilities, attributable mortality (AM), population attributable fraction (PAF) and expected length of stay. This work was performed on previously analysed hospital acquired infection (HAI) data. By definition, a HAI takes three days to develop and therefore selected metrics were also predicted from time 3 (delayed entry). RESULTS: Despite clear deviations from the constant transition rates assumption, the empirical estimates of the transition probabilities were approximated reasonably well by the exponential model. However, functions of the transition probabilities, e.g. AM and PAF, were not well approximated and the comparative models offered considerable improvements for these metrics. They also provided consistent predictions with the empirical estimates in the case of delayed entry time, unlike the exponential model. CONCLUSION: We conclude that methods and software are readily available for obtaining predictions from multi-state models that do not assume constant transition rates. The multistate package in Stata facilitates a range of predictions with confidence intervals, which can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the data. User-friendly code is provided.
BACKGROUND: Multi-state models are being increasingly used to capture complex disease pathways. The convenient formula of the exponential multi-state model can facilitate a quick and accessible understanding of the data. However, assuming time constant transition rates is not always plausible. On the other hand, obtaining predictions from a fitted model with time-dependent transitions can be challenging. One proposed solution is to utilise a general simulation algorithm to calculate predictions from a fitted multi-state model. METHODS: Predictions obtained from an exponential multi-state model were compared to those obtained from two different parametric models and to non-parametric Aalen-Johansen estimates. The first comparative approach fitted a multi-state model with transition-specific distributions, chosen separately based on the Akaike Information Criterion. The second approach was a Royston-Parmar multi-state model with 4 degrees of freedom, which was chosen as a reference model flexible enough to capture complex hazard shapes. All quantities were obtained analytically for the exponential and Aalen-Johansen approaches. The transition rates for the two comparative approaches were also obtained analytically, while all other quantities were obtained from the fitted models via a general simulation algorithm. Metrics investigated were: transition probabilities, attributable mortality (AM), population attributable fraction (PAF) and expected length of stay. This work was performed on previously analysed hospital acquired infection (HAI) data. By definition, a HAI takes three days to develop and therefore selected metrics were also predicted from time 3 (delayed entry). RESULTS: Despite clear deviations from the constant transition rates assumption, the empirical estimates of the transition probabilities were approximated reasonably well by the exponential model. However, functions of the transition probabilities, e.g. AM and PAF, were not well approximated and the comparative models offered considerable improvements for these metrics. They also provided consistent predictions with the empirical estimates in the case of delayed entry time, unlike the exponential model. CONCLUSION: We conclude that methods and software are readily available for obtaining predictions from multi-state models that do not assume constant transition rates. The multistate package in Stata facilitates a range of predictions with confidence intervals, which can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the data. User-friendly code is provided.
Authors: J Beyersmann; P Gastmeier; H Grundmann; S Bärwolff; C Geffers; M Behnke; H Rüden; M Schumacher Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2006-04-20 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Hein Putter; Jos van der Hage; Geertruida H de Bock; Rachid Elgalta; Cornelis J H van de Velde Journal: Biom J Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.207
Authors: Jennifer G Le-Rademacher; Ryan A Peterson; Terry M Therneau; Ben L Sanford; Richard M Stone; Sumithra J Mandrekar Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: G Manzini; T J Ettrich; M Kremer; M Kornmann; D Henne-Bruns; D A Eikema; P Schlattmann; L C de Wreede Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 4.615