Literature DB >> 3343052

Lacteal immunity to enteric cryptosporidiosis in mice: immune dams do not protect their suckling pups.

H W Moon1, D B Woodmansee, J A Harp, S Abel, B L Ungar.   

Abstract

The susceptibilities of passively immunized principal and nonimmunized control suckling mice to orogastric challenge with Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts were compared. Principals were suckled by dams that had recovered from C. parvum infection. Controls were suckled by dams reared free of C. parvum infection. Principals and controls were equally susceptible to challenge. Principals were susceptible even when their dams were hyperimmunized by oral and parenteral booster inoculations with C. parvum oocysts. Immune dams produced serum antibody against C. parvum, while nonimmune dams did not. Anti-cryptosporidia immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA were demonstrated in whey extracted from the stomachs of principals that had suckled immune dams but not in whey extracted from the stomachs of controls. It was concluded that passive lacteal immunity is not an efficient means of protection against cryptosporidiosis in mice. As in other coccidian infections, protective immunity against cryptosporidiosis may depend more on immune cells than on antibody.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3343052      PMCID: PMC259340          DOI: 10.1128/iai.56.3.649-653.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  28 in total

1.  Cryptosporidiosis.

Authors:  H W Moon; D B Woodmansee
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1986-09-15       Impact factor: 1.936

2.  An in vitro study of sporulation in Cryptosporidium species.

Authors:  D B Woodmansee
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.276

3.  Cryptosporidiosis in northeastern Brazil: association with sporadic diarrhea.

Authors:  C S Weikel; L I Johnston; M A De Sousa; R L Guerrant
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  [Course of natural Cryptosporidium infections on 4 cattle-breeding farms].

Authors:  E Stein; J Boch; J Heine; G Henkel
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 0.328

5.  Cryptosporidium and diarrhoea in southern Indian children.

Authors:  M M Mathan; S Venkatesan; R George; M Mathew; V I Mathan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-11-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Cryptosporidiosis: clinical, epidemiologic, and parasitologic review.

Authors:  T R Navin; D D Juranek
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1984 May-Jun

7.  Quantification of specific antibody response to Cryptosporidium antigens by laser densitometry.

Authors:  B L Ungar; T E Nash
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Cryptosporidiosis in children from some highland Costa Rican rural and urban areas.

Authors:  L Mata; H Bolaños; D Pizarro; M Vives
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.345

9.  Enzyme immunoassay detection of immunoglobulin M and G antibodies to Cryptosporidium in immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons.

Authors:  B L Ungar; R Soave; R Fayer; T E Nash
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 10.  Enteric viral infections of calves and passive immunity.

Authors:  L J Saif; K L Smith
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  18 in total

1.  Susceptibility of mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice to Cryptosporidium parvum.

Authors:  J A Harp; H W Moon
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Diagnostic biomarkers in murine Cryptosporidiosis: dose- and age-related infection.

Authors:  Hebat-Allah S Yousof; Mona M Khater; Shaimaa H El-Sayed; Ayman A El-Badry
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2017-02-18

Review 3.  Some infectious causes of diarrhea in young farm animals.

Authors:  R E Holland
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Immune responses to Cryptosporidium muris and Cryptosporidium parvum in adult immunocompetent or immunocompromised (nude and SCID) mice.

Authors:  V McDonald; R Deer; S Uni; M Iseki; G J Bancroft
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Cryptosporidium parvum (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) oocyst and sporozoite antigens recognized by bovine colostral antibodies.

Authors:  M Tilley; R Fayer; A Guidry; S J Upton; B L Blagburn
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Immunotherapeutic efficacy of bovine colostral immunoglobulins from a hyperimmunized cow against cryptosporidiosis in neonatal mice.

Authors:  R Fayer; A Guidry; B L Blagburn
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Experimental Cryptosporidium parvum infections in immunosuppressed adult mice.

Authors:  K R Rasmussen; M C Healey
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Resistance of calves to Cryptosporidium parvum: effects of age and previous exposure.

Authors:  J A Harp; D B Woodmansee; H W Moon
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 9.  Cryptosporidiosis.

Authors:  W L Current; L S Garcia
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Cryptosporidium muris in adult mice: adoptive transfer of immunity and protective roles of CD4 versus CD8 cells.

Authors:  V McDonald; H A Robinson; J P Kelly; G J Bancroft
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.