| Literature DB >> 33430407 |
Allison Ford1, Isabelle Uny1, Judith Lowes1, Felix Naughton2, Sue Cooper3, Tim Coleman3, Peter Hajek4, Dunja Przulj4, Katie Myers Smith4, Linda Bauld5, Lesley Sinclair5, Robert Walton4, Miranda Clark3, Michael Ussher1,6.
Abstract
Use of e-cigarettes (vaping) has potential to help pregnant women stop smoking. This study explored factors influencing adherence among participants in the vaping arm of the first trial of vaping for smoking cessation in pregnancy. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 28) with women at three-months postpartum. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis, informed by the Theoretical-Domains Framework, Necessity-Concerns Framework and Perceptions and Practicalities Approach. Interviewees generally reported high levels of vaping. We found that: (1) intervention adherence was driven by four necessity beliefs-stopping smoking for the baby, and vaping for harm reduction, smoking cessation or as a last resort; (2) necessity beliefs outweighed vaping concerns, such as dependence and safety; (3) adherence was linked to four practicalities themes, acting as barriers and facilitators to vaping-device and e-liquid perceptions, resources and support, whether vaping became habitual, and social and environmental factors; and (4) intentional non-adherence was rare; unintentional non-adherence was due to device failures, forgetting to vape, and personal circumstances and stress. Pregnant smokers provided with e-cigarettes, and with generally high levels of vaping, had positive beliefs about the necessity of vaping for smoking cessation which outweighed concerns about vaping. Non-adherence was mainly due to unintentional factors.Entities:
Keywords: e-cigarettes; interviews; necessity-concerns framework; perceptions and practicalities approach; pregnancy; qualitative; vaping
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33430407 PMCID: PMC7827544 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390