Literature DB >> 33430350

The Perceived Restorativeness of Differently Managed Forests and Its Association with Forest Qualities and Individual Variables: A Field Experiment.

Jenni Simkin1,2, Ann Ojala1, Liisa Tyrväinen1.   

Abstract

Despite increasing research knowledge about the positive well-being effects forests have on citizens, it is still unclear how the quality of forests and individual variables effect the well-being. This research investigated (1) the differences in restorative experiences (components being away, fascination, compatibility and extent, measured by perceived restorativeness (PRS)), and (2) how people evaluate forest qualities in four differently managed forests. Furthermore, this research studied (3) which individual variables (4) as well as forest qualities, explain the overall restorative experience (PRS-score from all components). Altogether, 66 volunteers were taken in small groups to each of the four forest sites once, after their day at work. The participants viewed the forests for 15 min and then walked inside the forests for 30 min. Their perceived restorativeness and perceptions about forest qualities were measured on-site after each visit. Most of the components of PRS differed between the three older forests compared to the young forest. The three older forests also had more preferred qualities, compared to the young commercial forest. From the individual variables, the nature relatedness positively explained the restorative experiences (PRS-score) in old-growth forest and in mature commercial forest. Beauty was the most important quality that explained PRS-score in all forests. Biodiversity positively explained the PRS-score, except in urban recreation forest. However, not all forest qualities need to be present in order to reach high perceived restorativeness and both a pristine or managed old forest can have high restorative values. Also, decaying wood does not seem to diminish forests' restorative values, but there may be individual differences in its acceptance. Therefore, a greater attention to the overall versatility is needed when managing the forest used for outdooring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity; field experiment; forest management; forest qualities; individual variables; nature relatedness; perceived restorativeness; psychological restoration; well-being

Year:  2021        PMID: 33430350      PMCID: PMC7825791          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  18 in total

1.  The restorative benefits of walking in urban and rural settings in adults with good and poor mental health.

Authors:  Jenny Roe; Peter Aspinall
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Restorative effects of urban green environments and the role of urban-nature orientedness and noise sensitivity: A field experiment.

Authors:  Ann Ojala; Kalevi Korpela; Liisa Tyrväinen; Pekka Tiittanen; Timo Lanki
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  The nature and measurement of meaning.

Authors:  C E OSGOOD
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1952-05       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: the effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood.

Authors:  Robert G Ribe
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Environmental influences on psychological restoration.

Authors:  T Hartig; A Böök; J Garvill; T Olsson; T Gärling
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1996-12

6.  Perceived green qualities were associated with neighborhood satisfaction, physical activity, and general health: results from a cross-sectional study in suburban and rural Scania, southern Sweden.

Authors:  Kim de Jong; Maria Albin; Erik Skärbäck; Patrik Grahn; Jonas Björk
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.078

7.  Natural surroundings in childhood are associated with lower schizophrenia rates.

Authors:  Kristine Engemann; Jens-Christian Svenning; Lars Arge; Jørgen Brandt; Camilla Geels; Preben Bo Mortensen; Oleguer Plana-Ripoll; Constantinos Tsirogiannis; Carsten Bøcker Pedersen
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Forest experience and psychological health benefits: the state of the art and future prospect in Korea.

Authors:  Won Sop Shin; Poung Sik Yeoun; Rhi Wha Yoo; Chang Seob Shin
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.674

9.  The affective quality of human-natural environment relationships.

Authors:  Joe Hinds; Paul Sparks
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-03

10.  The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Nisbet; John M Zelenski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of Forest Users' Stress on Perceived Restorativeness, Forest Recreation Motivation, and Mental Well-Being during COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Don-Gak Lee; Jin-Gun Kim; Bum-Jin Park; Won Sop Shin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  How Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Forest Park Are Associated with Stress Restoration in Beijing?

Authors:  Congying An; Jinglan Liu; Qiaohui Liu; Yuqi Liu; Xiaoli Fan; Yishen Hu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  What Activities in Forests Are Beneficial for Human Health? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sujin Park; Eunsoo Kim; Geonwoo Kim; Soojin Kim; Yeji Choi; Domyung Paek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.