Literature DB >> 33430223

Trends in Phase II Trials for Cancer Therapies.

Faruque Azam1, Alexei Vazquez1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Drug combinations are the standard of care in cancer treatment. Identifying effective cancer drug combinations has become more challenging because of the increasing number of drugs. However, a substantial number of cancer drugs stumble at Phase III clinical trials despite exhibiting favourable efficacy in the earlier Phase.
Methods: We analysed recent Phase II cancer trials comprising 2165 response rates to uncover trends in cancer therapies and used a null model of non-interacting agents to infer synergistic and antagonistic drug combinations. We compared our latest efficacy dataset with a previous dataset to assess the progress of cancer therapy.
Results: Targeted therapies reach higher response rates when used in combination with cytotoxic drugs. We identify four synergistic and 10 antagonistic combinations based on the observed and expected response rates. We demonstrate that recent targeted agents have not significantly increased the response rates. Conclusions: We conclude that either we are not making progress or response rate measured by tumour shrinkage is not a reliable surrogate endpoint for the targeted agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phase II; cancer; clinical trials; drug combinations; overall response rate

Year:  2021        PMID: 33430223      PMCID: PMC7825663          DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  55 in total

1.  Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Javier Cortés; Sung-Bae Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Roberto Hegg; Young-Hyuck Im; Laslo Roman; José Luiz Pedrini; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Adam Knott; Emma Clark; Mark C Benyunes; Graham Ross; Sandra M Swain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method.

Authors:  Ting-Chao Chou
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Five years of EMA-approved systemic cancer therapies for solid tumours-a comparison of two thresholds for meaningful clinical benefit.

Authors:  N Grössmann; J C Del Paggio; S Wolf; R Sullivan; C M Booth; K Rosian; R Emprechtinger; C Wild
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST.

Authors:  Robert S Benjamin; Haesun Choi; Homer A Macapinlac; Michael A Burgess; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Lei L Chen; Donald A Podoloff; Chuslip Charnsangavej
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA study): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.

Authors:  Sandra M Swain; Sung-Bae Kim; Javier Cortés; Jungsil Ro; Vladimir Semiglazov; Mario Campone; Eva Ciruelos; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Andreas Schneeweiss; Adam Knott; Emma Clark; Graham Ross; Mark C Benyunes; José Baselga
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Bevacizumab improves pathologic response and protects against hepatic injury in patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Dario Ribero; Huamin Wang; Matteo Donadon; Daria Zorzi; Melanie B Thomas; Cathy Eng; David Z Chang; Steven A Curley; Eddie K Abdalla; Lee M Ellis; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy: a new outcome end point after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases.

Authors:  Dan G Blazer; Yoji Kishi; Dipen M Maru; Scott Kopetz; Yun Shin Chun; Michael J Overman; David Fogelman; Cathy Eng; David Z Chang; Huamin Wang; Daria Zorzi; Dario Ribero; Lee M Ellis; Katrina Y Glover; Robert A Wolff; Steven A Curley; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Complete pathologic response after preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: myth or reality?

Authors:  René Adam; Dennis A Wicherts; Robbert J de Haas; Thomas Aloia; Francis Lévi; Bernard Paule; Catherine Guettier; Francis Kunstlinger; Valérie Delvart; Daniel Azoulay; Denis Castaing
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Randolph Hecht; Edith Mitchell; Tarek Chidiac; Carroll Scroggin; Christopher Hagenstad; David Spigel; John Marshall; Allen Cohn; David McCollum; Philip Stella; Robert Deeter; Seta Shahin; Rafael G Amado
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk and benefit for umbrella trials in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karolina Strzebonska; Mateusz Blukacz; Mateusz T Wasylewski; Maciej Polak; Bishal Gyawali; Marcin Waligora
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 11.150

2.  Risk and Benefit for Targeted Therapy Agents in Pediatric Phase II Trials in Oncology: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karolina Strzebonska; Mateusz T Wasylewski; Lucja Zaborowska; Maciej Polak; Emilia Slugocka; Jakub Stras; Mateusz Blukacz; Bishal Gyawali; Marcin Waligora
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.493

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.