Literature DB >> 33429905

Removal of Aerosolized Contaminants from Working Canines via a Field Wipe-Down Procedure.

Erin B Perry1, Dakota R Discepolo1, Stephen Y Liang2, Eileen K Jenkins3.   

Abstract

Evidence-based canine decontamination protocols are underrepresented in the veterinary literature. Aerosolized microbiological and chemical contaminants can pose a risk in deployment environments highlighting the need for improved canine field decontamination strategies. Prior work has established the efficacy of traditional, water-intensive methods on contaminant removal from the coat of the working canine; however, it is not known if similar reductions can be achieved with simple field expedient methods when resources are limited. The objective of this study was to measure the reduction of aerosolized contamination via a practical "wipe-down" procedure performed on working canine coats contaminated with a fluorescent, non-toxic, water-based aerosol. Disposable, lint-free towels were saturated with one of three treatments: water, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate scrub (CHX), or 7.5% povidone-iodine scrub (PVD). Both CHX and PVD were diluted at a 1:4 ratio. Treatments were randomly assigned to one of three quadrants established across the shoulders and back of commonly utilized working dog breeds (Labrador retrievers, n = 16; German shepherds, n = 16). The fourth quadrant remained unwiped, thus serving as a control. Reduction in fluorescent marker contamination was measured and compared across all quadrants. PVD demonstrated greater marker reduction compared to CHX or water in both breeds (p < 0.0001). Reduction was similar between CHX or water in Labradors (p = 0.86) and shepherds (p = 0.06). Effective wipe-down strategies using common veterinary cleansers should be further investigated and incorporated into decontamination practices to safeguard working canine health and prevent cross-contamination of human personnel working with these animals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerosolized contaminants; decontamination; working dog

Year:  2021        PMID: 33429905      PMCID: PMC7826634          DOI: 10.3390/ani11010120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  19 in total

1.  Handler training improves decontamination of working canines with oil-based exposure in field conditions using disposable kits.

Authors:  Ellie B Powell; Gary A Apgar; Eileen K Jenkins; Stephen Y Liang; Erin B Perry
Journal:  J Vet Behav       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 1.975

2.  The development of a new three-step protocol to determine the efficacy of disinfectant wipes on surfaces contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  G J Williams; S P Denyer; I K Hosein; D W Hill; J-Y Maillard
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  The crucial role of wiping in decontamination of high-touch environmental surfaces: review of current status and directions for the future.

Authors:  Syed A Sattar; Jean-Yves Maillard
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Injuries and illnesses among Federal Emergency Management Agency-certified search-and-recovery and search-and-rescue dogs deployed to Oso, Washington, following the March 22, 2014, State Route 530 landslide.

Authors:  Lori E Gordon
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 1.936

5.  Fecal contamination of agricultural soils before and after hurricane-associated flooding in North Carolina.

Authors:  Michael J Casteel; Mark D Sobsey; J Paul Mueller
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.269

Review 6.  Povidone iodine in wound healing: A review of current concepts and practices.

Authors:  Paul Lorenz Bigliardi; Syed Abdul Latiff Alsagoff; Hossam Yehia El-Kafrawi; Jai-Kyong Pyon; Chad Tse Cheuk Wa; Martin Anthony Villa
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 7.  Cleansing without compromise: the impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing.

Authors:  K P Ananthapadmanabhan; David J Moore; Kumar Subramanyan; Manoj Misra; F Meyer
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.851

8.  An evaluation of current working canine decontamination procedures and methods for improvement.

Authors:  Erin Venable; Dakota Discepolo; Ellie Powell; Stephen Y Liang
Journal:  J Vet Behav       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 1.975

9.  Comparison of Bacterial Diversity in Air and Water of a Major Urban Center.

Authors:  M Elias Dueker; Shaya French; Gregory D O'Mullan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  Generic aspects of the airborne spread of human pathogens indoors and emerging air decontamination technologies.

Authors:  M Khalid Ijaz; Bahram Zargar; Kathryn E Wright; Joseph R Rubino; Syed A Sattar
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.918

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Use and Potential of Biomedical Detection Dogs During a Disease Outbreak.

Authors:  Michele N Maughan; Eric M Best; Jenna Dianne Gadberry; Caitlin E Sharpes; Kelley L Evans; Calvin C Chue; Patrick Lawrence Nolan; Patricia E Buckley
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 2.  Working Dog Service, Harmful Agent Exposure and Decontamination.

Authors:  Carla L Jarrett; Morgan Brathwaite; Robert M Gogal; Steven D Holladay
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-02

3.  Routine Decontamination of Surfaces Relevant to Working Dogs: Neutralization of Superficial Coronavirus Contamination.

Authors:  Sarah L Grady; Natalie M Sebeck; Mellisa Theodore; Karen L Meidenbauer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.231

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.