Zuoqin Yang1, Yan Li2, Zihao Zou3, Ying Zhao3, Wei Zhang3, Huiling Jiang3, Yujun Hou3, Ying Li4, Qianhua Zheng3. 1. Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Chengdu Pidu District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine/the 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (West District), No. 169, 1st Section of Zhongxin Avenue. 2. Department of Central Transportation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 28, Dianxin South Road. 3. School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina. 4. Graduate School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 37 Shi'er Qiao Road, Chengdu, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients' expectation to treatment response is one source of placebo effects. A number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported that expectation benefits to acupuncture treatment, while some did not. Previous systematic reviews failed to draw a confirmative conclusion due to the methodological heterogeneity. It is necessary to conduct a new systematic review to find out whether expectation can influence acupuncture outcomes. METHODS: We systematically search English and Chinese databases from their inception to 3rd October, 2020, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP). RCTs that evaluated the relationship between expectation and treatment response following acupuncture for adults will be included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment will be conducted independently. Risk of bias will be assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Data synthesis will be performed by Review Manager (RevMan) software if the data is suitable for synthesis. RESULTS: This systematic review will provide evidence that whether patients' expectation impacts on the therapeutic effects of acupuncture. This protocol will be performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items from Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. The findings of this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. CONCLUSION: This systematic review aims to assess whether a higher level of patient's expectation contributes to a better outcome after acupuncture treatment, and in which medical condition this contribution will be more significant. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY2020100020 on International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols.
BACKGROUND: Patients' expectation to treatment response is one source of placebo effects. A number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported that expectation benefits to acupuncture treatment, while some did not. Previous systematic reviews failed to draw a confirmative conclusion due to the methodological heterogeneity. It is necessary to conduct a new systematic review to find out whether expectation can influence acupuncture outcomes. METHODS: We systematically search English and Chinese databases from their inception to 3rd October, 2020, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP). RCTs that evaluated the relationship between expectation and treatment response following acupuncture for adults will be included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment will be conducted independently. Risk of bias will be assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Data synthesis will be performed by Review Manager (RevMan) software if the data is suitable for synthesis. RESULTS: This systematic review will provide evidence that whether patients' expectation impacts on the therapeutic effects of acupuncture. This protocol will be performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items from Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. The findings of this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. CONCLUSION: This systematic review aims to assess whether a higher level of patient's expectation contributes to a better outcome after acupuncture treatment, and in which medical condition this contribution will be more significant. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY2020100020 on International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols.
Authors: Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Carol Looney; Yanfang Liu; Vanessa Cox; Kenneth Pietz; Donald M Marcus; Richard L Street Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Klaus Linde; Claudia M Witt; Andrea Streng; Wolfgang Weidenhammer; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Benno Brinkhaus; Stefan N Willich; Dieter Melchart Journal: Pain Date: 2007-01-25 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Hanns-Peter Scharf; Ulrich Mansmann; Konrad Streitberger; Steffen Witte; Jürgen Krämer; Christoph Maier; Hans-Joachim Trampisch; Norbert Victor Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-07-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Stephanie L Prady; Jane Burch; Laura Vanderbloemen; Simon Crouch; Hugh MacPherson Journal: Complement Ther Med Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 2.446
Authors: David Moher; Larissa Shamseer; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2015-01-01