| Literature DB >> 33429725 |
Jin Li1, Rui Jin2, Renhao Ze1, Saroj Rai3, Yudong Liu4, Xin Tang1, Ruikang Liu5, Pan Hong1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Calcaneal fractures are rare in pediatric population, with more displaced intra-articular fractures encountered due to the increasing number of high-energy trauma. Operative interventions are gaining popularity because of the unsatisfactory outcomes of traditional conservative methods. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive technique using the sinus tarsi approach and external fixator in the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures in pediatric patients.Patients who underwent open reduction between January 2010 and January 2018 at our institute were included in this study and reviewed retrospectively. Radiological and clinical parameters were all recorded and analyzed.Overall, 29 patients were included in the study, including 23 boys and 6 girls (10.2 ± 2.2 years old). The average follow-up was 29.5 months postoperatively (range, 26-72 months). Bohler angle was 15.2 ± 3.3° preoperatively, and 34.0 ± 3.8° postoperatively (P < .001); Gissane angle was 101.8 ± 6.2 degrees preoperatively, and 129.7 ± 6.2° postoperatively (P < .001). The average length of incision was 3.4 ± 0.7 cm. At the last follow-up, all patients showed satisfactory clinical outcomes and the score was 90.0 ± 2.3 according to American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Scale.Minimally invasive approach with external fixator is an effective method for treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures in pediatric patients, with a lower incidence of wound-related complications and good cosmetic outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33429725 PMCID: PMC7793431 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Procedures of sinus tarsi approach. (A) Skin mark of the incision. (B) Exposure of the fracture and posterior articular surface. (C) Reduction of the articular surface. (D) Appearance of the foot after surgery.
Figure 2An 8-year-old boy suffering from calcaneal fracture. (A) Sagittal plane of CT scan of the calcaneal fracture before surgery. (B) Cross-section of CT scan of the calcaneal fracture before surgery. (C) Lateral X-ray of calcaneum after surgery. (D) Lateral X-ray of calcaneum at first month follow-up. (E) Lateral X-ray of calcaneum at third month follow-up. (F) Lateral X-ray of calcaneum at sixth month follow-up.
Figure 3A 9-year-old boy of calcaneal fracture. (A) Sagittal plane of CT scan of calcaneal fracture before surgery. (B) Cross-section of CT scan of calcaneal fracture before surgery. (C) Lateral X-ray of calcaneum after surgery. (D) Lateral X-ray of calcaneum at first month follow-up. (E) Lateral X-ray of calcaneum at second month follow-up. (F) Axial view of calcaneum at second month follow-up.
Figure 4An 11-year-old girl suffering from calcaneal fracture and concomitant lower leg injuries. (A) Appearance of the sinus tarsi incision. (B) Plantar flexion of the ankle. (C) Posterior view of the ankle.
Demographic parameters.
| Clinical parameters | N (%) |
| Age (mean, yr) | 10.2 ± 2.2 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 23 (79.3) |
| Female | 6 (20.7) |
| Affected side | |
| Right | 12 (41.4) |
| Left | 17 (58.6) |
| Mechanism of injury | |
| Fall from over 2 m | 13 (44.8) |
| Fall from below 2 m | 9 (31.0) |
| Road traffic accident | 7 (24.1) |
| Sanders classification | |
| Type II | 7 (24.1) |
| Type III | 15 (51.7) |
| Type IV | 7 (24.1) |
Radiographic results.
| Bohler angle, degree | Gissane angle | |||||
| Sanders classification | Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Type II | 13.4 ± 3.3 | 33.1 ± 4.0 | <.001 | 101.9 ± 6.4 | 131.4 ± 6.0 | <.001 |
| Type III | 16.3 ± 2.7 | 34.7 ± 3.9 | <.001 | 102.5 ± 6.6 | 128.7 ± 6.1 | <.001 |
| Type IV | 14.7 ± 3.2 | 33.3 ± 3.0 | <.001 | 100.3 ± 4.2 | 130.1 ± 5.9 | <.001 |
| All (II+III+IV) | 15.2 ± 3.3 | 34.0 ± 3.8 | <.001 | 101.8 ± 6.2 | 129.7 ± 6.2 | <.001 |
Clinical outcomes.
| AOFAS Scale | Type II | Type III | Type IV | All (II+III+IV) |
| Total (100) | 92.1 ± 2.2 | 90.0 ± 1.4 | 88.0 ± 2.3 | 90.0 ± 2.3 |