| Literature DB >> 33429424 |
Joseph T Glessner1,2, Xiurui Hou3, Cheng Zhong3, Jie Zhang4, Munir Khan1,2, Fabian Brand5, Peter Krawitz5, Patrick M A Sleiman2, Hakon Hakonarson2, Zhi Wei3.
Abstract
Copy number variations (CNVs) are an important class of variations contributing to the pathogenesis of many disease phenotypes. Detecting CNVs from genomic data remains difficult, and the most currently applied methods suffer from an unacceptably high false positive rate. A common practice is to have human experts manually review original CNV calls for filtering false positives before further downstream analysis or experimental validation. Here, we propose DeepCNV, a deep learning-based tool, intended to replace human experts when validating CNV calls, focusing on the calls made by one of the most accurate CNV callers, PennCNV. The sophistication of the deep neural network algorithm is enriched with over 10 000 expert-scored samples that are split into training and testing sets. Variant confidence, especially for CNVs, is a main roadblock impeding the progress of linking CNVs with the disease. We show that DeepCNV adds to the confidence of the CNV calls with an optimal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.909, exceeding other machine learning methods. The superiority of DeepCNV was also benchmarked and confirmed using an experimental wet-lab validation dataset. We conclude that the improvement obtained by DeepCNV results in significantly fewer false positive results and failures to replicate the CNV association results.Entities:
Keywords: copy number variation; deep learning
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33429424 PMCID: PMC8681111 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brief Bioinform ISSN: 1467-5463 Impact factor: 11.622