Kyunghoon Kim1, Hyeong-Moo Shin2, Luann Wong3, Thomas M Young3, Deborah H Bennett4. 1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas, Arlington, TX, USA. 2. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas, Arlington, TX, USA. Electronic address: hyeongmoo.shin@uta.edu. 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Polyurethane foam (PUF), a proven sampling medium for measuring air concentrations of organic compounds, is widely used in upholstered home furniture. We evaluated the potential utility of couch PUF as a passive sampler and as a reservoir for non-flame retardant semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs). METHODS: We collected PUF samples from 13 California home couches, measured concentrations (CPUF) of 64 SVOCs at three different depths (i.e., top, top-middle, and middle from couch surfaces facing outward), and examined concentration changes with depth. To calculate the PUF-air partition coefficient (KPUF-air = CPUF/Cair = CPUF × Kdust-air/Cdust), we used the calculated dust-air partition coefficient (Kdust-air) with the octanol-air partition coefficient (Koa) and dust concentrations (Cdust) simultaneously collected and measured. We used KPUF-air to compute fugacity capacity of PUF and chemical mass distribution among various indoor compartments and PUF. RESULTS: Among 29 detected compounds, 11 compounds were detected in more than 50% of the samples at all depths. Among the 11 compounds, concentrations of phenanthrene, 2-benzylideneoctanal, galaxolide, tonalide, and homosalate decreased with depth. Among the studied SVOCs, more than 20% of the total mass was distributed to couch PUF for phenol and compounds in skin-applied products (i.e., 2-benzylideoneoctanal, galaxolide, and homosalate). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that couch PUF can absorb many SVOCs and may be an important reservoir for some SVOCs. However, it may not be an effective passive sampling medium for those that have relatively high Koa values. Direct dermal contact with couch seats may be an important exposure route for non-users of skin-applied compounds.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Polyurethane foam (PUF), a proven sampling medium for measuring air concentrations of organic compounds, is widely used in upholstered home furniture. We evaluated the potential utility of couch PUF as a passive sampler and as a reservoir for non-flame retardant semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs). METHODS: We collected PUF samples from 13 California home couches, measured concentrations (CPUF) of 64 SVOCs at three different depths (i.e., top, top-middle, and middle from couch surfaces facing outward), and examined concentration changes with depth. To calculate the PUF-air partition coefficient (KPUF-air = CPUF/Cair = CPUF × Kdust-air/Cdust), we used the calculated dust-air partition coefficient (Kdust-air) with the octanol-air partition coefficient (Koa) and dust concentrations (Cdust) simultaneously collected and measured. We used KPUF-air to compute fugacity capacity of PUF and chemical mass distribution among various indoor compartments and PUF. RESULTS: Among 29 detected compounds, 11 compounds were detected in more than 50% of the samples at all depths. Among the 11 compounds, concentrations of phenanthrene, 2-benzylideneoctanal, galaxolide, tonalide, and homosalate decreased with depth. Among the studied SVOCs, more than 20% of the total mass was distributed to couch PUF for phenol and compounds in skin-applied products (i.e., 2-benzylideoneoctanal, galaxolide, and homosalate). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that couch PUF can absorb many SVOCs and may be an important reservoir for some SVOCs. However, it may not be an effective passive sampling medium for those that have relatively high Koa values. Direct dermal contact with couch seats may be an important exposure route for non-users of skin-applied compounds.
Authors: Robin E Dodson; Vincent Bessonneau; Julia O Udesky; Marcia Nishioka; Martha McCauley; Ruthann A Rudel Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Peter C Tromp; Henry Beeltje; Joseph O Okeme; Roel Vermeulen; Anjoeka Pronk; Miriam L Diamond Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 7.086
Authors: Foday M Jaward; Nick J Farrar; Tom Harner; Andrew J Sweetman; Kevin C Jones Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Joanne S Colt; Nathaniel Rothman; Richard K Severson; Patricia Hartge; James R Cerhan; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Wendy Cozen; Lindsay M Morton; Anneclaire J De Roos; Scott Davis; Stephen Chanock; Sophia S Wang Journal: Blood Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 22.113