Literature DB >> 33429244

Comparison of Satisfaction With Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Patients With Radical Prostatectomy or Radical Cystoprostatectomy to the General Population.

Skyler Howell1, Stephen Palasi1, Travis Green2, Christopher Kannady2, Sravan Panuganti2, Kris Slaughter2, Kyle Blum2, Baibing Yang1, Jose A Saavedra-Belaunde3, Run Wang4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Penile prosthesis implantation is a widely used treatment option for erectile dysfunction. Data is limited with regard to patient satisfaction with a penile prosthesis following radical prostatectomy/cystoprostatectomy vs patients with erectile dysfunction of other etiologies. AIM: To examine patient satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation and determine if a difference in satisfaction exists in post-prostatectomy/cystoprostatectomy patients vs patients with erectile dysfunction of other etiologies. We hypothesize that etiology does not affect satisfaction.
METHODS: A total of 164 patients underwent penile prosthesis implantation at our institution between August 2017 and December 2019, with 102 patients completing a validated 14 item questionnaire, Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), at 6 months postoperation. Demographics, surgical characteristics, and erectile dysfunction etiology were recorded. Patients were assigned to one of 2 groups: postprostatectomy/postcystoprostatectomy erectile dysfunction or other etiologies. The study group was further analyzed between radical prostatectomy or radical cystoprostatectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction based on key EDITS questions with postradical prostatectomy/cystoprostatectomy vs patients with erectile dysfunction of other etiologies.
RESULTS: Responses to 3 questions were analyzed: overall satisfaction, expectations met in the past 4 weeks, and confidence in the ability to participate in sexual activity. Chi-square analysis was performed to determine the difference in responses. No difference was seen in overall satisfaction (P = .96), expectations (P = .78), or confidence (P = .78) between groups. On subgroup analysis, there was no difference in reported overall satisfaction (P = .47) or confidence (P = .080) between postprostatectomy and postcystoprostatectomy patients. Postprostatectomy and postcystoprostatectomy patients differed in whether the penile prosthesis implantation met expectations (P = .033). Postprostatectomy patients reported a mean score of 3.5/4 compared to postcystoprostatectomy patients, who reported a mean of 3.0/4.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that key erectile function scores are not significantly different between postprostatectomy/postcystoprostatectomy patients compared to other etiologies. The difference in measures between postprostatectomy and postcystoprostatectomy patients is not significant or of unclear significance. Registration # of clinical trial: HSC-MS-19-0320 Howell S, Palasi S, Green T, et al. Comparison of Satisfaction With Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Patients With Radical Prostatectomy or Radical Cystoprostatectomy to the General Population. Sex Med 2020;XX:XXX-XXX.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erectile Dysfunction; Patient Satisfaction; Penile Implantation; Penile Prosthesis; Prostatectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33429244     DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Med        ISSN: 2050-1161            Impact factor:   2.491


  1 in total

Review 1.  News and future perspectives of non-surgical treatments for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Celeste Manfredi; Fabio Castiglione; Mikkel Fode; Michal Lew-Starowicz; Javier Romero-Otero; Carlo Bettocchi; Giovanni Corona
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.408

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.