Literature DB >> 33428736

Symptom Provocation During Aerobic and Dynamic Supervised Exercise Challenges in Adolescents With Sport-Related Concussion.

Michael Popovich1, Andrew Sas2, Andrea Ana Almeida1, Jeremiah Freeman3, Bara Alsalaheen1, Matthew Lorincz1, James T Eckner4.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Supervised exercise challenges (SECs) have been shown to be safe and beneficial in the early symptomatic period after concussion. Thus far, most in-clinic SECs studied have included a form of basic aerobic exercise only. An SEC that also includes dynamic forms of exercise mimics all steps of a standard return-to-play progression and may enhance the detection of concussion symptoms to guide in-clinic management decisions.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an SEC that includes a dynamic SEC (DSEC) uncovered symptoms that would not have been identified by an SEC involving an aerobic SEC (ASEC) alone in adolescent patients with sport-related concussion.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Multidisciplinary sport concussion clinic at a tertiary care center. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 65 adolescent athletes (mean age = 14.9 ± 2.0 years, 72.3% males) who underwent an in-clinic SEC within 30 days of concussion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Presence of pre-exercise symptoms and symptom provocation during the SEC were recorded, with exercise-provoked symptoms categorized as occurring during ASEC or DSEC.
RESULTS: Of the total patient sample, 69.2% (n = 45/65) experienced symptom provocation at some point during the SEC. Symptoms were provoked in 20 patients during the ASEC, whereas 25 completed the ASEC without symptom provocation before becoming symptomatic during the subsequent DSEC and 20 completed the SEC without any symptom provocation. Of the 65 patients in the total sample, 46 were asymptomatic immediately before the SEC. Of these previously asymptomatic patients, 23.9% (n = 11/46) experienced symptom provocation during the ASEC, and an additional 37.0% (n = 17/46) remained asymptomatic during the ASEC but then developed symptoms during the DSEC.
CONCLUSIONS: The ASEC alone may not detect symptom provocation in a significant proportion of concussion patients who otherwise would develop symptoms during a DSEC. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; mild traumatic brain injury; return to play

Year:  2021        PMID: 33428736      PMCID: PMC7901575          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0072.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  30 in total

1.  Graded Exercise Testing Predicts Recovery Trajectory of Concussion in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Rhonda Orr; Tina Bogg; Andrew Fyffe; Lawrence T Lam; Gary J Browne
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.638

2.  The Dizzy Patient: Consider a Second Diagnosis.

Authors:  Roeland B van Leeuwen; Carla Colijn; Erik van Wensen; Tjasse D Bruintjes
Journal:  Neurologist       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.398

3.  Vestibular rehabilitation for dizziness and balance disorders after concussion.

Authors:  Bara A Alsalaheen; Anne Mucha; Laura O Morris; Susan L Whitney; Joseph M Furman; Cara E Camiolo-Reddy; Michael W Collins; Mark R Lovell; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Association Between Early Participation in Physical Activity Following Acute Concussion and Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Anne M Grool; Mary Aglipay; Franco Momoli; William P Meehan; Stephen B Freedman; Keith Owen Yeates; Jocelyn Gravel; Isabelle Gagnon; Kathy Boutis; Willem Meeuwisse; Nick Barrowman; Andrée-Anne Ledoux; Martin H Osmond; Roger Zemek
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Effects of physical exercise on depressive symptoms and biomarkers in depression.

Authors:  Trevor Archer; Torbjorn Josefsson; Magnus Lindwall
Journal:  CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.388

6.  Cardiovascular fitness, cortical plasticity, and aging.

Authors:  Stanley J Colcombe; Arthur F Kramer; Kirk I Erickson; Paige Scalf; Edward McAuley; Neal J Cohen; Andrew Webb; Gerry J Jerome; David X Marquez; Steriani Elavsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Concussion in sports: postconcussive activity levels, symptoms, and neurocognitive performance.

Authors:  Cynthia W Majerske; Jason P Mihalik; Dianxu Ren; Michael W Collins; Cara Camiolo Reddy; Mark R Lovell; Amy K Wagner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  A Brief Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) assessment to evaluate concussions: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Anne Mucha; Michael W Collins; R J Elbin; Joseph M Furman; Cara Troutman-Enseki; Ryan M DeWolf; Greg Marchetti; Anthony P Kontos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern; Philip Glasgow; Anthony Schneiders; Erik Witvrouw; Benjamin Clarsen; Ann Cools; Boris Gojanovic; Steffan Griffin; Karim M Khan; Håvard Moksnes; Stephen A Mutch; Nicola Phillips; Gustaaf Reurink; Robin Sadler; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Kristian Thorborg; Arnlaug Wangensteen; Kevin E Wilk; Mario Bizzini
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  The use of an intensive physical exertion test as a final return to play measure in concussed athletes: a prospective cohort.

Authors:  Cameron M Marshall; Nicole Chan; Pauline Tran; Carol DeMatteo
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.