Literature DB >> 33428044

Overnight attending radiologist coverage decreases imaging-related emergency department recalls by at least 90.

Rawan Abu Mughli1, Eric Durrant2, Deyvison Talmo Baia Medeiros3, Dominick Shelton4, Jason Robins1, Sadia R Qamar1, Michael E O'Keeffe1, Ferco H Berger5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Benefits of overnight attending radiologist final reports are debated, often stating low resident discrepancy rates, usually assessed retrospectively. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of overnight final reporting on the recall rates for patients in the emergency department (ED) receiving overnight imaging.
METHODS: Retrospective matched cohorts of two separate years prior (prior-16 and prior-17) and 1 year after (post-18) introduction of overnight attending radiologist final reporting. Patients receiving imaging between 22:00 and 07:00 h and returned to ED within 48 h of initial visit discharge were electronically identified. String matching identified return visits possibly related to imaging completed on first visit. Identified return visit notes were scored by three observers individually. Unclear and discrepant cases were resolved by consensus meeting, using full patient charts where needed. Incidences were provided and logistic regression analysis defined if coverage model was a predictor for recall. Odds ratios were calculated.
RESULTS: ED patient count with imaging completed overnight in prior-16 was 9200, in prior-17 was 9543, and in post-18 was 9992. The number of overnight imaging studies performed was respectively 13,883, 14,463, and 15,112. Imaging-related ED recalls were respectively 54, 61, and 7, a decrease with the new coverage model of 89% to true and at least 90% of expected recalls.Logistic regression demonstrated that coverage model was a significant predictor of ED recalls with chi-square of 59.86 and p < 0.001, an R2 of 0.03 (Hosmer and Lemeshow). Compared to post-18, ED patients had an odds ratio of 8.42 (prior-16) and 9.18 (prior-17) to be called back to ED.
CONCLUSION: Overnight final reporting significantly decreases ED recalls for patients receiving diagnostic imaging overnight. While numbers are low even prior to rollout, the number should be minimized wherever possible to diminish patient anxiety and discomfort, reduce ED overcrowding and expedite definitive management. KEY MESSAGES/WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Section 1: What is already known on this subject • Radiology resident preliminary report discrepancy rates are low. • Overnight attending radiologist coverage is a model increasingly applied in academic and large non-academic centers. • Patient recalls to the ED are a burden to the patient and impact patient throughput in (over)crowded EDs. Section 2: What this study adds • First study to look at the impact of overnight attending final reports on the recall rate for ED patients with overnight imaging performed. • While absolute numbers are low, there is a significant decrease in patients returning to ED for imaging related issues after introducing overnight attending coverage. • Resident autonomy can be preserved and training enhanced while increasing patient safety and comfort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crowding; Emergency department management; Imaging; Quality improvement; Recalls

Year:  2021        PMID: 33428044     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-020-01894-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  11 in total

1.  Clinical consequences of misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents.

Authors:  N R Lal; U M Murray; O P Eldevik; J S Desmond
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.

Authors:  Victoria F Cooper; Lori A Goodhartz; Albert A Nemcek; Robert K Ryu
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.

Authors:  Alexander T Ruutiainen; Mary H Scanlon; Jason N Itri
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy.

Authors:  Brent D Weinberg; Michael D Richter; Julie G Champine; M Craig Morriss; Travis Browning
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  Overnight Resident versus 24-hour Attending Radiologist Coverage in Academic Medical Centers.

Authors:  Michael A Bruno; James R Duncan; Andrew J Bierhals; Rafel Tappouni
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Practice policy and quality initiatives: decreasing variability in turnaround time for radiographic studies from the emergency department.

Authors:  Alexander J Towbin; Srikant B Iyer; James Brown; Kartik Varadarajan; Laurie A Perry; David B Larson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Evaluation of an emergency radiology quality assurance program at a level I trauma center: abdominal and pelvic CT studies.

Authors:  Luke S Yoon; Andrew H Haims; James A Brink; Reuven Rabinovici; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Discordance rates between preliminary and final radiology reports on cross-sectional imaging studies at a level 1 trauma center.

Authors:  Kathryn J Stevens; Karen L Griffiths; Jarrett Rosenberg; Swaminatha Mahadevan; Leslie M Zatz; Ann N C Leung
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 9.  Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jonathan H Chung; Roberta M Strigel; Annemarie Relyea Chew; Emily Albrecht; Martin L Gunn
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter?

Authors:  J C Hillier; D J Tattersall; F V Gleeson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patient recalls associated with resident-to-attending radiology report discrepancies: predictive factors for risky discrepancies.

Authors:  A Yeon Son; Gil-Sun Hong; Choong Wook Lee; Ju Hee Lee; Won Jung Chung; Jung Bok Lee
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-06-04

Review 2.  Update on establishing and managing an overnight emergency radiology division.

Authors:  Meir H Scheinfeld; R Joshua Dym
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-04-21

3.  Clinical Impact of a Quality Improvement Program Including Dedicated Emergency Radiology Personnel on Emergency Surgical Management: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.

Authors:  Gil-Sun Hong; Choong Wook Lee; Ju Hee Lee; Bona Kim; Jung Bok Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 7.109

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.