Literature DB >> 33427851

Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Multidisciplinary Intervention vs Usual Care on Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adults in an Accountable Care Organization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jennifer Gabbard1,2, Nicholas M Pajewski2,3, Kathryn E Callahan1,2, Ajay Dharod2,4, Kristie L Foley2,5, Keren Ferris1,2, Adam Moses2,6, James Willard2,3, Jeff D Williamson1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: Advance care planning (ACP), especially among vulnerable older adults, remains underused in primary care. Additionally, many ACP initiatives fail to integrate directly into the electronic health record (EHR), resulting in infrequent and disorganized documentation. Objective: To determine whether a nurse navigator-led ACP pathway combined with a health care professional-facing EHR interface improves the occurrence of ACP discussions and their documentation within the EHR. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a randomized effectiveness trial using the Zelen design, in which patients are randomized prior to informed consent, with only those randomized to the intervention subsequently approached to provide informed consent. Randomization began November 1, 2018, and follow-up concluded November 1, 2019. The study population included patients 65 years or older with multimorbidity combined with either cognitive or physical impairments, and/or frailty, assessed from 8 primary care practices in North Carolina. Interventions: Participants were randomized to either a nurse navigator-led ACP pathway (n = 379) or usual care (n = 380). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was documentation of a new ACP discussion within the EHR. Secondary outcomes included the usage of ACP billing codes, designation of a surrogate decision maker, and ACP legal form documentation. Exploratory outcomes included incident health care use.
Results: Among 759 randomized patients (mean age 77.7 years, 455 women [59.9%]), the nurse navigator-led ACP pathway resulted in a higher rate of ACP documentation (42.2% vs 3.7%, P < .001) as compared with usual care. The ACP billing codes were used more frequently for patients randomized to the nurse navigator-led ACP pathway (25.3% vs 1.3%, P < .001). Patients randomized to the nurse navigator-led ACP pathway more frequently designated a surrogate decision maker (64% vs 35%, P < .001) and completed ACP legal forms (24.3% vs 10.0%, P < .001). During follow-up, the incidence of emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations was similar between the randomized groups (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.50). Conclusions and Relevance: A nurse navigator-led ACP pathway integrated with a health care professional-facing EHR interface increased the frequency of ACP discussions and their documentation. Additional research will be required to evaluate whether increased EHR documentation leads to improvements in goal-concordant care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03609658.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33427851      PMCID: PMC7802005          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   44.409


  8 in total

1.  Trends in advance care planning and end-of-life care among persons living with dementia requiring surrogate decision-making.

Authors:  Hiroshi Gotanda; Anne M Walling; David B Reuben; Marie Lauzon; Yusuke Tsugawa
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 7.538

2.  What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?

Authors:  R Sean Morrison; Diane E Meier; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 157.335

3.  Refinement of an Emergency Department-Based, Advance Care Planning Intervention for Nurses.

Authors:  Batsheva R Rubin; Michelle Chung; Mohammad Adrian Hasdianda; Tamryn F Gray; Emily L Aaronson; Andrew Dundin; Natasha A Egorova; Anna C Revette; Donna Berry; Kei Ouchi
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Differences in goals of care discussion outcomes among healthcare professionals: an observational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Karen Ho; Krystyna Wang; Adam Clay; Elizabeth Gibbings
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 5.  Intersectoral communication amongst healthcare providers regarding care plans: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jodi Langley; Nikolas Jelicic; Taylor G Hill; Emily Kervin; Barbara Pesut; Wendy Duggleby; Grace Warner
Journal:  Palliat Care Soc Pract       Date:  2022-04-21

6.  L-Arginine Improves Cognitive Impairment in Hypertensive Frail Older Adults.

Authors:  Pasquale Mone; Antonella Pansini; Stanislovas S Jankauskas; Fahimeh Varzideh; Urna Kansakar; Angela Lombardi; Valentina Trimarco; Salvatore Frullone; Gaetano Santulli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-12

7.  Knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions of elderly individuals regarding advance care planning: Questionnaire development and testing.

Authors:  Hui-Chuan Cheng; Li-Shan Ke; Su-Yu Chang; Hsiu-Ying Huang; Yu-Chen Ku; Ming-Ju Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Huan Wang; Aiping Wang
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.113

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.