Literature DB >> 3342720

Intragastric bile does not perturb gastric emptying of liquids in humans.

N J Parr1, P R Baker, J S Grime, C R Mackie.   

Abstract

Gastric stasis and duodenogastric reflux have each been implicated in the pathogenesis of various upper gastrointestinal disorders. However, the relationship between intragastric bile and gastric emptying has not been explored. In each of nine healthy volunteers (seven men and two women, ages 22-47 years), gastric emptying of 300 ml 10% dextrose labeled with [99mTc]DTPA was measured twice using gamma camera imaging. During one study, 20 min after ingestion of the test meal, 525 mg of freeze-dried, sterilized human T-tube bile dissolved in 20 ml water was introduced into the stomach via a previously sited fine-bore nasogastric tube. Intragastric bile salt concentrations were calculated to be within the range 1.7-2.9 mM. In control studies, 20 ml of water alone was similarly introduced. Emptying at 20 min was comparable for both groups of studies (38 +/- 3% vs 39 +/- 4%; mean values +/- SEM). For each individual study, emptying from 20 to 60 min was well represented by a single exponential function (r = 0.81-0.99). Half-emptying times for curves fitted over this period were similar in the two groups (bile: T1/2 = 18.8 +/- 2.6 min; control T1/2 = 18.8 +/- 1.9 min). These results indicate that intragastric bile, in concentrations similar to those found in patients with gastric ulcer, has no effect on gastric emptying of dextrose in normal subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3342720     DOI: 10.1007/bf01535751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  15 in total

1.  A concept of the etiology of gastric and duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  L R DRAGSTEDT
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1956-02       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Enterogastric reflux and gastric clearance of refluxate in normal subjects and in patients with and without bile vomiting following peptic ulcer surgery.

Authors:  C Mackie; G Hulks; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Gallstones, gastric secretion, and flatulent dyspepsia.

Authors:  W M Capper; T J Butler; J O Kilby; M J Gibson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1967-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Duodeno-gastric reflux and acid secretion in patients with symptomatic hiatal hermia.

Authors:  D W Stol; G M Murphy; J L Collis
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Gastric emptying in atrophic gastritis and carcinoma of the stomach.

Authors:  W T Davies; J R Kirkpatrick; G M Owen; R Shields
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Bile acids, the "barrier," and reflux-related clinical disorders of the gastric mucosa.

Authors:  W P Ritchie
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Gastric emptying in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  R W McCallum; D M Berkowitz; E Lerner
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Bile acid composition in patients with and without symptoms of postoperative refulx gastritis.

Authors:  T R Gadacz; G D Zuidema
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  High-performance liquid chromatography of bile acids with a reversed-phase radial compression column.

Authors:  A D Reid; P R Baker
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1982-09-24

10.  Electrogastrographic study of patients with unexplained nausea, bloating, and vomiting.

Authors:  C H You; K Y Lee; W Y Chey; R Menguy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  1 in total

1.  Single oral dose of cisapride accelerates gastric antral emptying in healthy humans: an ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  T Takeda; H Konomi; G Naritomi; J Yoshida; H Matsunaga; K Akazawa; M Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.527

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.