Literature DB >> 33426997

Systemically delivered antibody-labeled magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are less toxic than plain nanoparticles when activated by alternating magnetic fields.

Chun-Ting Yang1,2, Preethi Korangath2,3, Jackie Stewart2, Chen Hu4, Wei Fu4, Cordula Grüttner5, Sarah E Beck6, Feng-Huei Lin1, Robert Ivkov2,3,7,8,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Toxicity from off-target heating with magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) is generally assumed to be understood. MHT research focuses on development of more potent heating magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONs), yet our understanding of factors that define biodistribution following systemic delivery remains limited. Preclinical development relies on mouse models, thus understanding off-target heating with MHT in mice provides critical knowledge for clinical development.
METHODS: Eight-week old female nude mice received a single tail vein injection of bionized nanoferrite (BNF) MIONs or a counterpart labeled with a polyclonal human antibody (BNF-IgG) at 1 mg, 3 mg or 5 mg Fe/mouse on day 1. On day 3, mice were exposed to an alternating magnetic field (AMF) having amplitude of 32, 48 or 64 kA/m at ∼145 kHz for 20 min. Twenty-four hours later, blood, livers and spleens were harvested and analyzed.
RESULTS: Damage to livers was apparent by histology and serum liver enzymes following MHT with BNF or BNF-IgG at doses ≥3 mg Fe and AMF amplitudes ≥48 kA/m. Differences between effects with BNF vs. BNF-IgG at a dose of 3 mg Fe were noted in all measures, with less damage and increased survival occurring in mice injected with BNF-IgG. Necropsies revealed severe damage to duodenum and upper small intestines, likely the immediate cause of death at the highest MHT doses.
CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that the MION coating affects biodistribution, which in turn determines off-target effects. Developments to improve heating capabilities of MIONs may be clinically irrelevant without better control of biodistribution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iron oxide nanoparticles; alternating magnetic fields; hyperthermia; magnetic nanoparticles; monoclonal antibody

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33426997      PMCID: PMC7810240          DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1776901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  55 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic nanoparticles: an update of application for drug delivery and possible toxic effects.

Authors:  Ji-Eun Kim; Ji-Young Shin; Myung-Haing Cho
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging and potential therapeutic applications in neurooncology and central nervous system inflammatory pathologies, a review.

Authors:  Jason S Weinstein; Csanad G Varallyay; Edit Dosa; Seymur Gahramanov; Bronwyn Hamilton; William D Rooney; Leslie L Muldoon; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Development of tumor targeting bioprobes ((111)In-chimeric L6 monoclonal antibody nanoparticles) for alternating magnetic field cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sally J DeNardo; Gerald L DeNardo; Laird A Miers; Arutselvan Natarajan; Alan R Foreman; Cordula Gruettner; Grete N Adamson; Robert Ivkov
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Size-Dependent Heating of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sheng Tong; Christopher A Quinto; Linlin Zhang; Priya Mohindra; Gang Bao
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Magnetic hyperthermia enhances cell toxicity with respect to exogenous heating.

Authors:  Beatriz Sanz; M Pilar Calatayud; Teobaldo E Torres; Mónica L Fanarraga; M Ricardo Ibarra; Gerardo F Goya
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  A/C magnetic hyperthermia of melanoma mediated by iron(0)/iron oxide core/shell magnetic nanoparticles: a mouse study.

Authors:  Sivasai Balivada; Raja Shekar Rachakatla; Hongwang Wang; Thilani N Samarakoon; Raj Kumar Dani; Marla Pyle; Franklin O Kroh; Brandon Walker; Xiaoxuan Leaym; Olga B Koper; Masaaki Tamura; Viktor Chikan; Stefan H Bossmann; Deryl L Troyer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  NanoFerrite particle based radioimmunonanoparticles: binding affinity and in vivo pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A Natarajan; C Gruettner; R Ivkov; G L DeNardo; G Mirick; A Yuan; A Foreman; S J DeNardo
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.774

8.  Magnetic nanoparticle-based hyperthermia for head & neck cancer in mouse models.

Authors:  Qun Zhao; Luning Wang; Rui Cheng; Leidong Mao; Robert D Arnold; Elizabeth W Howerth; Zhuo G Chen; Simon Platt
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 9.  Comprehensive cytotoxicity studies of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Rakesh M Patil; Nanasaheb D Thorat; Prajkta B Shete; Poonam A Bedge; Shambala Gavde; Meghnad G Joshi; Syed A M Tofail; Raghvendra A Bohara
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2018-01-08

10.  Enhancing the abscopal effect of radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies with magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia in a model of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Arlene L Oei; Preethi Korangath; Kathleen Mulka; Mikko Helenius; Jonathan B Coulter; Jacqueline Stewart; Esteban Velarde; Johannes Crezee; Brian Simons; Lukas J A Stalpers; H Petra Kok; Kathleen Gabrielson; Nicolaas A P Franken; Robert Ivkov
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.914

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Clinical magnetic hyperthermia requires integrated magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Sean Healy; Andris F Bakuzis; Patrick W Goodwill; Anilchandra Attaluri; Jeff W M Bulte; Robert Ivkov
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2022-03-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.