Literature DB >> 33426627

Copula Models for Addressing Sample Selection in the Evaluation of Public Health Programmes: An Application to the Leeds Let's Get Active Study.

Paolo Candio1,2, Andrew J Hill3, Stavros Poupakis4, Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström4,5, Chris Bojke3, Manuel Gomes6.   

Abstract

Sample selectivity is a recurrent problem in public health programmes and poses serious challenges to their evaluation. Traditional approaches to handle sample selection tend to rely on restrictive assumptions. The aim of this paper is to illustrate a copula-based selection model to handle sample selection in the evaluation of public health programmes. Motivated by a public health programme to promote physical activity in Leeds (England), we describe the assumptions underlying the copula selection, and its relative advantages compared with commonly used approaches to handle sample selection, such as inverse probability weighting and Heckman's selection model. We illustrate the methods in the Leeds Let's Get Active programme and show the implications of method choice for estimating the effect on individual's physical activity. The programme was associated with increased physical activity overall, but the magnitude of its effect differed according to adjustment method. The copula selection model led to a similar effect to the Heckman's approach but with relatively narrower 95% confidence intervals. These results remained relatively similar when different model specifications and alternative distributional assumptions were considered. The copula selection model can address important limitations of traditional approaches to address sample selection, such as the Heckman model, and should be considered in the evaluation of public health programmes, where sample selection is likely to be present.

Year:  2021        PMID: 33426627     DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00629-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  3 in total

1.  Interviewer identity as exclusion restriction in epidemiology.

Authors:  Till Bärnighausen; Jacob Bor; Speciosa Wandira-Kazibwe; David Canning
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  Incorporating Environmental Justice into Second Generation Indices of Multiple Deprivation: Lessons from the UK and Progress Internationally.

Authors:  Jon Fairburn; Werner Maier; Matthias Braubach
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  R You Still Using Excel? The Advantages of Modern Software Tools for Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Devin Incerti; Howard Thom; Gianluca Baio; Jeroen P Jansen
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.725

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.