Literature DB >> 33426614

Comparative Efficacy of Oral Calcitonin-Gene-Related Peptide Antagonists for the Treatment of Acute Migraine: Updated Meta-analysis.

Jae-Hwan Kwak1,2, In-Hwan Baek3,4, Dong Kyoung Ha5, Min Ji Kim5, Nayoung Han6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a new therapeutic target in migraine-a common disorder resulting in reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of five oral CGRP antagonists with that of a placebo and triptans against acute migraine via meta-analysis.
METHODS: Suitable randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP) to compare the efficacy of oral CGRP antagonists with that of a placebo and triptans against acute migraine. Review Manager 5.4 was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 17 trials met the eligibility criteria and were studied in detail. The CGRP antagonists were significantly more effective than the placebo with respect to outcomes such as pain freedom at 2 h post-dose (odds ratio = 2.11; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] = 1.90-2.35) and pain relief at 2 h post-dose (odds ratio = 1.94; 95% CIs = 1.70-2.21). Similar results were found in the subgroup analysis conducted to compare the clinical efficacy of the FDA-approved oral CGRP antagonists (ubrogepant and rimegepant) and placebo. However, the CGRP antagonists were less effective than the triptans with respect to outcomes such as pain freedom at 2 h post-dose (odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CIs = 0.55-0.78) and pain relief at 2 h post-dose (odds ratio = 0.78; 95% CIs = 0.66-0.93).
CONCLUSION: CGRP antagonists are more effective than placebo against acute migraine; however, further studies are required to consider CGRP antagonists as standard first-line treatment for acute migraine instead of triptans, especially in patients with co-existing cardiovascular diseases.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33426614     DOI: 10.1007/s40261-020-00997-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  37 in total

Review 1.  Taking the negative view of current migraine treatments: the unmet needs.

Authors:  Peer Tfelt-Hansen; Jes Olesen
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  The pathophysiology of migraine: implications for clinical management.

Authors:  Andrew Charles
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 3.  Treatment of acute migraine headache.

Authors:  Benjamin Gilmore; Magdalena Michael
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  Role of CGRP in Migraine.

Authors:  Lars Edvinsson
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2019

5.  Clinical features of migraine aura: Results from a prospective diary-aided study.

Authors:  Michele Viana; Grazia Sances; Mattias Linde; Natascia Ghiotto; Elena Guaschino; Marta Allena; Salvatore Terrazzino; Giuseppe Nappi; Peter J Goadsby; Cristina Tassorelli
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 6.292

6.  Migraine with aura and migraine without aura: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  B K Rasmussen; J Olesen
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 7.  Cardiovascular risk assessment and triptans.

Authors:  Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 8.  Pharmacological treatment of migraine: CGRP and 5-HT beyond the triptans.

Authors:  Tessa de Vries; Carlos M Villalón; Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 9.  The need for new acutely acting antimigraine drugs: moving safely outside acute medication overuse.

Authors:  Willem Sebastiaan van Hoogstraten; Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 10.  An Update: Pathophysiology of Migraine.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Philip R Holland
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.806

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A Comprehensive Review of Zavegepant as Abortive Treatment for Migraine.

Authors:  Nazir Noor; Alexis Angelette; Abby Lawson; Anjana Patel; Ivan Urits; Omar Viswanath; Cyrus Yazdi; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Monthly migraine days, tablet utilization, and quality of life associated with Rimegepant - post hoc results from an open label safety study (BHV3000-201).

Authors:  Karissa Johnston; Linda Harris; Lauren Powell; Evan Popoff; Vladimir Coric; Gilbert L'Italien; Curtis P Schreiber
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 3.  CGRP and Migraine: What Have We Learned From Measuring CGRP in Migraine Patients So Far?

Authors:  Katharina Kamm
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Trends in utilization and costs of migraine medications, 2017-2020.

Authors:  Jennifer L Nguyen; Kiraat Munshi; Samuel K Peasah; Elizabeth C S Swart; Monal Kohli; Rochelle Henderson; Chester B Good
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 8.588

Review 5.  New Approaches to Shifting the Migraine Treatment Paradigm.

Authors:  Brian Johnson; Frederick G Freitag
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.