Literature DB >> 33426397

Encrusted Urinary Tract Infections Due to Corynebacteria Species.

Hamza Sakhi1, Olivier Join-Lambert2, Anna Goujon3, Thibault Culty3, Paul Loubet4, Julien Dang5, Sylvain Drouot6, Hubert de Bayser7, Christophe Michaud7, Louise Ghislain8, Thomas Stehlé9, Christophe Legendre1, Dominique Joly1, Paul Meria10, Mohamad Zaidan5,11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Encrusted pyelitis and cystitis are peculiar disorders characterized by the calcification of the vesical, the pyelic, and/or the ureteral walls. These calcifications are composed of struvite and calcium carbonate‒apatite due to the presence of Corynebacterium urealyticum.
METHODS: We have identified the clinical features and outcomes of 17 patients with encrusted pyelitis (n = 15) or encrusted cystitis (n = 2). Diagnosis was based on computed tomography scan and sonography including thickening and calcified lesions of the urinary tract.
RESULTS: The main clinical presentation was suggestive of subacute urinary tract infection with fever and urologic symptoms, mostly gross hematuria. Biologic features were characterized by the presence of struvite crystals and alkaline urine. Acute kidney injury was reported in 70.6% of cases. Predisposing factors were mostly due to urologic background (82.4%) with a history of urologic procedure (71%) and prior exposure to antibiotics (59%). All patients received appropriate antibiotherapy and 15 were treated with topical urinary acidification. A significant reduction of encrusted calcifications was observed in 88% of cases. Renal function improved in 71% of the patients. Nevertheless, poor tolerance of the treatment and side effects were common, affecting 71% of patients, with Gram-negative bacilli urinary tract infections (53%) being the most frequent. At last follow-up, 4 patients (23.5%) progressed to end-stage renal disease and only 1 had a clinical relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: Encrusted urinary tract infections are rare, characterized by a severe renal and overall prognosis in the absence of appropriate treatment. Topical urinary acidification and appropriate antibiotherapy are efficient but may be burdened by significant adverse events.
© 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corynebacterium; Corynebacterium urealyticum; encrusted cystitis; encrusted pyelitis; encrusted urinary tract infections

Year:  2020        PMID: 33426397      PMCID: PMC7783559          DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int Rep        ISSN: 2468-0249


Encrusted urinary tract infections are rare disorders characterized by the calcification of the bladder (cystitis), the ureteral, and/or the pyelic (pyelitis) walls. Similarly to infection-related nephrolithiasis, these calcifications are usually composed of struvite (ammonium magnesium phosphate) and calcium carbonate‒apatite crystals.2, 3, 4 Struvite stones represent about 10% of nephrolithiasis, and are due to urinary infections with urea-splitting bacteria. The expression of urease activity allows the conversion of urea and water into ammonium and bicarbonate, leading to urine alkalization (urinary pH > 7.2). Subsequent coprecipitation of ammonium with magnesium and phosphate then results in struvite crystals and urinary encrustations. Urea-splitting agents include a wide range of pathogens depending on the level of urease activity. Struvite stones are most often related to upper urinary tract infections due to Klebsiella sp and Proteus sp. Encrusted pyelitis and cystitis are almost invariably due to infections by Corynebacterium urealyticum, a Gram-positive slow-growing bacillus, characterized by a major urease activity that colonizes the skin., C urealyticum is identified in up to 30% of hospitalized patients, and infection usually develops in a nosocomial context, particularly after exposure to antibiotics. Encrusted pyelitis and cystitis were initially reported in renal transplant patients. However, cases involving native kidneys were also reported., In the present retrospective study, we addressed the spectrum and outcome of patients with encrusted urinary tract infections, focusing more specifically on management and renal outcome.

Methods

Study Population

Patients were retrospectively identified through a French nationwide survey. The diagnosis of encrusted cystitis and pyelitis was based on imaging features including thickening and calcified lesions of the bladder and/or renal calyces and pelvis. Diagnosis of isolated encrusted cystitis was made by ultrasonography while diagnosis of encrusted pyelitis with or without cystitis was based on computed tomography (CT) scan. The identification of corynebacteria in the urine was a major diagnostic criterion. The presence of Gram-positive bacilli, struvite crystals, and/or alkaline urinary pH (≥8) was considered as an alternative criterion in the absence of corynebacteria.

Data Collection

Demographic, clinical, and biologic data were recorded retrospectively at diagnosis, during and at the end of follow-up for all patients. Systemic symptoms, signs of cystitis or pyelonephritis, serum creatinine level, urine culture, urine pH, and crystalluria were collected. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined according to clinical practice guidelines. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was determined using the simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined according to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative classification. Patients were evaluated by ultrasonography and/or CT scan at diagnosis and during follow-up.

Treatment Modalities and Outcome

Treatment modalities included surgical resection of encrusted calcifications, use of topical urine acidification, and nature of the antibiotics at diagnosis and in case of relapse. Treatment efficacy was based on clinical assessment, kidney function improvement, imaging studies, and urine culture. The regression of the calcifications was evaluated by CT scan (encrusted pyelitis) and/or ultrasonography (encrusted cystitis) performed at different time-points during follow-up.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data using STATA version 11.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Continuous variables were expressed using median values with interquartile range, as appropriate for nonparametric data. Categorical variables were expressed as count and percent for categorical variables.

Results

Demographics

Over the last 2 decades, 17 patients with encrusted pyelitis and/or cystitis, including 7 males and 10 females, were identified from 7 different French hospitals. Two patients had isolated encrusted cystitis based on ultrasonography findings, and 15 displayed encrusted pyelitis, associated with encrusted cystitis in 3, as assessed by CT scan. Four patients had bilateral encrusted pyelitis, and 4 had encrusted pyelitis on the renal allograft (Table 1 and Figure 1).
Table 1

Patients’ characteristics at diagnosis

CharacteristicsAll patients (N = 17)
Demographics
 Age, yr67.5 (56‒68)
 Female10 (58.8)
Presenting symptoms
 Delay between first symptoms and diagnosis, mo2 (1‒6)
 Weight loss6 (35.3)
 Fever7 (41.2)
 Dysuria2 (11.8)
 Flank or suprapubic pain4 (23.5)
 Gross hematuria11 (64.7)
Biologic parameters
 Inflammatory syndrome10 (58.8)
 Renal function
 SCr, μmol/L315 (209.8‒395)
 Underlying CKD10 (58.9)
 AKI12 (70.6)
 Hydronephrosis11 (64.7)
 Urine pH > 811 of 11 (100)
 Struvite crystals11 of 11 (100)
Radiologic findings (CT scan, sonography)
 Isolated cystitis2
 Encrusted pyelitis15
 Unilateral pyelitis7 (46.7)
 Bilateral pyelitis4 (26.7)
 Kidney graft pyelitis4 (26.7)
 With encrusted cystitis3 (20)

AKI, acute kidney injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CT computed tomography; IQR, interquartile range; SCr, serum creatinine.

Data are n (%) or median (IQR), unless otherwise noted.

Figure 1

Abdominal computed tomography scan findings at diagnosis showing bilateral encrusted pyelitis of the native kidney (a,b) (red arrows), the kidney graft (c; red arrows), and encrusted cystitis (d; red arrows).

Patients’ characteristics at diagnosis AKI, acute kidney injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CT computed tomography; IQR, interquartile range; SCr, serum creatinine. Data are n (%) or median (IQR), unless otherwise noted. Abdominal computed tomography scan findings at diagnosis showing bilateral encrusted pyelitis of the native kidney (a,b) (red arrows), the kidney graft (c; red arrows), and encrusted cystitis (d; red arrows). Past medical history included type 2 diabetes mellitus (23.5%), untreated HIV infection (1 patient), and autoimmune hepatitis in 4 (1 patient). Ten (58.9%) patients had pre-existing CKD with a median estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline of 39 (30.5–71.5) ml/min per 1.73 m2 (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1), but none had been previously referred to a nephrologist. Four patients had undergone a renal transplantation. Overall, 14 patients (82.4%) had a “urologic background,” including urologic cancer (n = 4), former neurogenic bladder (n = 3), and urologic complications after renal transplantation (n = 2), which included lymphocele and ureteral anastomosis necrosis, extrinsic chronic ureteral obstruction (n = 2), and other causes (n = 3). Interestingly, 12 patients (70.6%) had undergone some kind of urologic procedure, including continent skin diversion or cutaneous ureterostomy in 5 patients, endoscopic procedures in 3 cases, and post-transplant reintervention in 2 renal transplant patients. Two patients had nonurologic cancer with non–Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and colonic cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Finally, 10 patients (59%) had been exposed to antibiotics before diagnosis, most often (n = 9) due to urinary tract infections with Gram-negative bacilli (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1).
Table 2

Patients’ past medical history

All patients (N =17)
General history
 Renal transplantation4 (23.5)
 Type 2 diabetes mellitus4 (23.5)
 Chronic kidney disease10 (58.9)
 Baseline eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m239 (30.5‒71.5)
 HIV/autoimmune hepatitis2 (13.3)
 Nonurologic cancer2 (13.3)
Urologic history
 Prior urinary tract infection9 (52.9)
 Urologic disease14 (82.4)
 Urologic cancer4 (23.5)
 Post-transplant complications2 (11.8)
 Neurogenic bladder3 (17.6)
 Extrinsic chronic ureteral obstruction2 (11.8)
 Other3 (17.6)
 Urologic procedures12 (70.6)
 Continent skin diversion/cutaneous ureterostomy5 (29.4)
 Post-transplant reintervention2 (11.8)
 Endoscopic procedure without further surgery3 (17.6)
 Other (scrotal fistula surgery/unilateral nephrectomy)2 (11.8)

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range.

Data expressed as n (%) or median (IQR), unless otherwise noted.

Patients’ past medical history eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range. Data expressed as n (%) or median (IQR), unless otherwise noted.

Diagnosis

Presenting features are summarized in Table 1 and detailed in Supplementary Table S1. The delay between initial symptoms and diagnosis was variable, with a median of 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1–6) months. Median age at diagnosis was 67.5 (IQR 56–68) years. Eleven patients (64.7%) had systemic manifestations, including weight loss and fever. Urologic signs were reported in >70% of cases, including dysuria in 2 patients with encrusted cystitis. Flank pain was observed in 3 cases (20%). Hematuria was present in all but 1 patient, with gross hematuria in 64.7% of cases. Inflammatory syndrome was reported in 10 patients, all with encrusted pyelitis. Corynebacterium was identified in 14 patients, but initially missed in 4 cases. C urealyticum was involved in 13 cases and C striatum in 1 patient. Three patients had a negative urine culture on standard media, albeit Gram-positive bacilli were initially detected on direct urine examination. Alkali urinary pH ≥ 8 was a constant finding. Crystalluria showed struvite crystals in all cases. AKI was observed in 12 (70.6%) patients, all with encrusted pyelitis, and dilation of the collecting duct system was observed in 11 patients (64.7%). At diagnosis, median serum creatinine was 315 (IQR 209.8–395) μmol/L.

Treatment and Outcome

All patients were treated with appropriate antibiotherapy for a median period of 9 (IQR 4.5–12.5) weeks. Intravenous glycopeptides (vancomycin or teicoplanin) were administered in 15 patients, and linezolid in 1 patient. Conservative therapy consisted in topical urine acidification using Thomas solution (27 g each of sodium gluconate, citric acid, and malic acid, in 1 L of distilled water) or Suby solution (32.3 g citric acid, 4.4 g sodium carbonate, 3.8 g magnesium oxide, 1 L distilled water). Recommended parameters of irrigation included a flow rate of 10 to 20 ml/h, increasing to 50 to 100 ml/h with an intrarenal or pelvic pressure <25 cm H2O, but treatment was tailored under patient’s doctor supervision. Treatment was administered through a percutaneous nephrostomy placed at the initiation of the treatment. All patients, except 2, received topical acidification, which was administered for a median time of 3 (IQR 2–6) weeks. When available, urine pH acidification (urinary pH <4) was obtained in all treated patients. Acetohydroxamic acid was given for 1 month after topical acidification in 2 patients but was well tolerated in only 1 case (Supplementary Table S2). Among the 2 patients who did not receive acidification therapy, 1 underwent a surgical resection of the encrusted material and the other was given linezolid for only 2 weeks. The availability of the topical acidification at the time of management in these 2 cases was unknown. Another patient with encrusted pyelitis and struvite stones also underwent a pyelotomy to extract the stones (Supplementary Table S2). All the patients had a favorable clinical and biologic response, including the 2 patients with isolated encrusted cystitis (Supplementary Table S3). Nevertheless, poor clinical tolerance of the topical acidification was reported in 4 (23.5%) patients due to pain and malnutrition. Metabolic acidosis was observed in 5 (29.4%) patients (Table 3), whereas infections were observed in 11 (73.3%) patients. Nine patients developed urinary tract infection with a septic shock in 2, 1 had a cutaneous fistula near the nephrostomy, and 7 displayed urinary candidosis in the course of topical acidification.
Table 3

Patients’ outcome at end of treatment and at last follow-up

All patients (N = 17)
At end of treatment
 Response evaluation
 Negative urine culture for corynebacteria17 (100)
 Urine pH6.5 (6.3‒6.7)
 Renal calcification reduction observed15 (88.2)
 Persistent residual calcifications10 (58.8)
 Renal function assessment
 Normal renal function3 (17.6)
 Improvement of kidney function11 (64.7)
 Return to baseline function6 (35.3)
 No improvement1 (5.9)
 Stable renal function2 (11.8)
 Creatinine165 (105‒210.5)
 Side effects
 Infections
 Urinary tract infection9 (52.9)
 Candiduria7 (41.2)
 Metabolic acidosis5 (29.4)
 Poor clinical tolerance (pain, fistula, other)4 (23.5)
At last follow-up
 Follow-up, mo15 (10–30)
 Kidney assessment
 eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m234 (16‒70)
 eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m28 (47.1)
 ESRD4 (23.5)
 Relapse
 Clinical relapse1 (5.9)
 Asymptomatic relapse suspected3 (17.6)
 Crystal struvite2 (11.8)
 Positive culture1 (5.9)
 Encrustation progression1 (5.9)
 Renal calculi2 (11.8)

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; IQR, interquartile range.

Data expressed as n Data are n (%) or median (IQR), unless otherwise noted.

Patients’ outcome at end of treatment and at last follow-up eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; IQR, interquartile range. Data expressed as n Data are n (%) or median (IQR), unless otherwise noted. Urine cultures finally returned negative for corynebacteria in all cases. Complete or partial regression of encrusted calcifications was observed in 15 patients, including 14 who were treated by acidification (Figure 2). Persistent calcifications were observed in 10 (67%) patients treated by acidification. The nonresponder patient was actually treated for only 5 days and before kidney function worsened, leading to treatment discontinuation (Table 3). At the end of treatment, renal function improved in almost all cases, whereas it remains stable in 5 patients, including 3 with an initially normal baseline value and 2 with CKD. Nevertheless, return to baseline value was observed in only 6 patients (35.3%), and median serum creatinine was 165 (IQR 105–210) μmol/L (Table 3).
Figure 2

Comparison of computed tomography scan findings before (left panels) and after (right panels) treatment by topical acidification and antibiotics in case of encrusted pyelitis on native (a,b) or kidney graft (c) showing a significant reduction of encrusted calcifications (red arrows) at the end of treatment.

Comparison of computed tomography scan findings before (left panels) and after (right panels) treatment by topical acidification and antibiotics in case of encrusted pyelitis on native (a,b) or kidney graft (c) showing a significant reduction of encrusted calcifications (red arrows) at the end of treatment. Only one of the treated patients with acidification presented with a new symptomatic flare. The patient had been treated for <1 week and rapidly progressed to end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. He finally died from septic shock. One patient presented with progression of the encrustations 1 month after treatment discontinuation, and finally underwent a surgical resection. Two patients had recurrence of struvite crystals in the urine, including 1 with a positive urine culture for C urealyticum, but none displayed de novo renal calcifications or symptomatic encrusted pyelitis. Finally, 2 patients presented with new struvite stones, with 1 resulting in obstructive AKI (Table 3). At last follow-up, and after a median follow-up time of 15 (IQR 10‒30) months, median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 34 (IQR 16–70) ml/min per 1.73 m2; 8 (47%) patients had severe CKD, and 4 (23.5%) had reached end-stage renal disease. Four patients died (23.5%) because of urothelial carcinoma (n = 1), progressive lymphoma (n = 1), or septic shock (n = 2) (Table 3 and Supplementary Table S4).

Discussion

In this study we have illustrated the diagnostic challenge, management modalities, and renal outcome of patients with encrusted pyelitis and/or cystitis. So far, only a few series have characterized the spectrum of encrusted urinary tract infections due to corynebacteria species (Supplementary Table S5).11, 12, 13, 14,17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 Despite suggestive imaging features, diagnosis of encrusted urinary tract infection is challenging given the need for specific culture media to identify corynebacteria species and the important delay between first symptoms and established diagnosis. Of note, most patients present with obstructive renal failure, and most have pre-existing chronic kidney disease at the time of diagnosis, suggesting a chronic unrecognized process. Although urinary tract obstruction is likely the main cause of CKD, local inflammation due to encrustations, and pyelonephritis may also contribute to renal function deterioration. Recent studies indicate an increase in the incidence of Corynebacterium urinary infections, suggesting a potential underestimation of encrusted pyelitis and cystitis. Corynebacterium urinary colonization is observed in <1% of patients, mostly in those who had been hospitalized and had previous antibiotic treatment and urologic gestures, as observed in our study. At-risk patients include immunocompromised subjects,, and those with a heavy urologic background, including malignancy and other urologic disorders. Urologic gestures associated with a mucosal breach, particularly transurethral prostate interventions or percutaneous stone surgery, may favor bacterial inoculation within the urinary tract leading to infection in 1% to 5% of cases. Thus, Corynebacterium, which usually colonizes the skin, may be inoculated within the urinary tract during such procedures. Given the risk of incomplete recovery of renal function after urine diversion and septic shock with pyelocaliceal microabcesses, an earlier diagnosis would improve renal and overall outcome. The detection of alkali urine (especially pH ≥ 8) and struvite crystals in at-risk patients may thus be helpful and cost-effective to make an early diagnosis of corynebacteria infections. CT scan may also show typical encrusted calcifications. Differential diagnosis includes other infectious diseases such as schistosomiasis and tuberculosis, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and underlying neoplastic lesions. Nevertheless, it should be stressed that the presence of linear calcifications along the pyelic wall is strongly evocative, and the presence of corynebacteria in urine culture make the diagnosis. However, because corynebacteria are slow-growing germs, and the Gram-positive rods initially identified on direct examination may be missed by standard urine culture, the diagnosis should not be ruled out on the basis of negative standard cultures, and the bacteriologist should be aware of the suspicion of Corynebacterium infection to adapt the medium culture and the diagnostic procedure. The broader use of modern techniques, such as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy, will certainly allow a more accurate recognition of such species and should be carried out in these cases. Although Corynebacterium seems to be less virulent than other urinary tract bacteria, the germs are resistant to most of the commonly used antibiotics for urinary tract infections. Because ineffective treatment is associated with poor outcome, it should be underscored that glycopeptides with vancomycin represent the most commonly used antibiotics for the treatment of corynebacteria. Given the risk of nephrotoxicity associated with glycopetids, particularly when prescribed for a prolonged period, the use of linezolid, as reported in 1 of our patients, may represent a useful alternative, but this requires further investigation. The present series also illustrates the different options to treat encrusted urinary tract infections due to corynebacteria species. The management was historically based on the surgical resection of the encrusted material, which is burdened by a significant risk of hemorrhage.,, Oral acetohydroxamic acid was also proposed as a complementary treatment, albeit its use was limited because of poor tolerance and a major delay before significant improvement. As suggested by our study, the combination of topical urine acidification and antibiotherapy represent a good alternative to control the infection and improve immediate renal function. Nevertheless, a prolonged hospitalization is most often necessary, exposing to iatrogenic complications in elderly and frail patients. Acidification may be poorly tolerated and may require reducing the flow rate of instillation. Patients are also exposed to a high risk of de novo urinary tract infections and candiduria, which may convert into septic shock. Altogether, such adverse events may prompt interruption of the treatment before the initially defined duration of 4 weeks. Surprisingly, the rate of recurrence seems to be very low, despite the potential persistence of calcifications in some cases. Indeed, complete regression of encrustations was observed in only 7 (41.2%) patients. The eradication of calcifications at any cost should thus be discussed in the light of treatment tolerance and overall prognosis. In conclusion, encrusted pyelitis and cystitis affect frail patients with a longstanding urologic history and comorbid conditions. Early diagnosis is mandatory to initiate appropriate treatment. The therapeutic strategy is unique compared with other urinary tract infections. The combination of topical urine acidification and antibiotherapy represents an alternative to surgery. Nevertheless, treatment tolerance and potential complications should also be considered. Further studies would help to better clarify treatment modalities, including the duration of urine acidification and antibiotherapy. A better monitoring of at-risk patients would also improve renal and overall outcomes.

Disclosure

All the authors declared no competing interests.
  29 in total

1.  [Conservative management of Corynebacterium urealyticum encrusted cystitis].

Authors:  Abdelhak Khallouk; Hervé Wallerand; François Kleinclauss; Hugues Bittard; Stéphane Bernardini
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.915

2.  Skin colonization by Corynebacterium groups D2 and JK in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  F Soriano; J L Rodriguez-Tudela; R Fernández-Roblas; J M Aguado; M Santamaría
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Corynebacterium urealyticum (CDC Group D2) associated with staghorn calculus: treatment by percutaneous debulking and chemolysis.

Authors:  R B Nadler; T A Hoffman; B L McClennan; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  The conservative management of corynebacterium group D2 encrusted pyelitis.

Authors:  P Meria; A Desgrippes; R Fournier; C Arfi; C Antoine; L Martinat; P Teillac; A Le Duc
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Preoperative assessment of the patient and risk factors for infectious complications and tentative classification of surgical field contamination of urological procedures.

Authors:  Magnus Grabe; Henry Botto; Mete Cek; Peter Tenke; Florian M E Wagenlehner; Kurt G Naber; Truls E Bjerklund Johansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Incidence and characteristics of urinary tract infections caused by Corynebacterium urealyticum (Corynebacterium group D2).

Authors:  T Nebreda-Mayoral; J L Muñoz-Bellido; J A Garcia-Rodríguez
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  In vitro and in vivo study of stone formation by Corynebacterium group D2 (Corynebacterium urealyticum).

Authors:  F Soriano; C Ponte; M Santamaría; C Castilla; R Fernández Roblas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  The lifestyle of Corynebacterium urealyticum derived from its complete genome sequence established by pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Andreas Tauch; Eva Trost; Alexandra Tilker; Ulrike Ludewig; Susanne Schneiker; Alexander Goesmann; Walter Arnold; Thomas Bekel; Karina Brinkrolf; Iris Brune; Susanne Götker; Jörn Kalinowski; Paul-Bertram Kamp; Francisco Pereira Lobo; Prisca Viehoever; Bernd Weisshaar; Francisco Soriano; Marcus Dröge; Alfred Pühler
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Urinary tract infection due to Corynebacterium urealyticum in kidney transplant recipients: an underdiagnosed etiology for obstructive uropathy and graft dysfunction-results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  F López-Medrano; M García-Bravo; J M Morales; A Andrés; R San Juan; M Lizasoain; J M Aguado
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  Corynebacterium urealyticum: a comprehensive review of an understated organism.

Authors:  Nagla Salem; Lamyaa Salem; Sally Saber; Ghada Ismail; Martin H Bluth
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mechanisms of Zhenwu decoction for the treatment of renal fibrosis at various stages: What is the role of Corynebacterium?

Authors:  Lijing Du; Yiping Zhang; Shuai Ji; Leqi Wang; Xiaoshan Zhao; Shikai Yan; Xue Xiao; Shasha Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 6.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.